A three-level approach to ontology merging

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 3789 LNAI, Issue , 2005, Pages 80-89

  Buccella, Agustina ^a   Cechich, Alejandra ^a   Brisaboa, Nieves ^b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL DEL COMAHUE   (Argentina)

^b UNIVERSITY OF A CORUÑA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; DATABASE SYSTEMS; SEMANTICS; WORLD WIDE WEB;

FEDERATED DATABASES; ONTOLOGY; SEMANTIC WEB; SEMI-AUTOMATIC METHOD;

COMPUTER SCIENCE;

EID: 33646787833     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/11579427_9     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Buccella A., Cechich A. and Brisaboa N.R. An Ontology Approach to Data Integration. JCS&T, Vol.3(2). Available at http://journal.info.unlp.edu.ar/ default.html, pp. 62-68, 2003.
2. Buccella A., Cechich A., and Brisaboa N. A Federated Layer to Integrate Heterogeneous Knowledge, VODCA 2004: First International Workshop on Views on Designing Complex Architectures, Bertinoro, Italy, 11-12 Sept. 2004. Electronic Notes in Theoretical Computer Science, Elsevier Science B.V.
3. Buccella A., Cechich A. and Brisaboa N.R. An Ontology-based Environment to Data Integration. IDEAS 2004, pp. 79-90, 3-7 May, 2004.
4. Eclipse Home Page, http://www.eclipse.org.
5. Fridman Noy, N. and Musen, M. PROMPT: algorithm and tool for automated ontology merging and alignment. Proc. AAAI '00, 450-455.
6. Gruber, T. A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowledge Acquisition 1993 -Vol.5(2): pp. 199-220, 2003.
7. Hovy, E. Combining and standardizing large-scale, practical ontologies for machine translation and other uses. Proc. 1st Intl. Conf. on Language Resources and Evaluation, Granada, Spain, 1998.
8. Java SE Platform, http://java.sun.com.
9. Java Servlet. http://java.sun.com/products/servlet/.
10. Kalfoglou, Y. and Schorlemmer, M. Ontology mapping: the state of the art. The Knowledge Engineering Review, 18(1), pp. 1-31, 2003.
11. Klein, M. Combining and relating ontologies: an analysis of problems and solutions. IJCAJ-2001 Workshop on Ontologies and Information Sharing, Seattle, WA, 2001.
12. Levenshtein, I. V., Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions, and reversals. Cybernetics and Control Theory, Vol.10(8), pp. 707-710,1996.
13. Lin, D. An Information-Theoretic Definition of Similarity. Proceedings of the Fifteenth International Conference on Machine Learning, pp.296-304, July 24-27,1998.
14. Maedche, A., Staab, S. Measuring Similarity between Ontologies. EKAW 2002: 251-263.
15. McGuinness, D., Pikes, R., Rice, J. and Wilder, S. An environment for merging and testing large Oontologies.Proc. KR '00,483-493.
16. Ontolingua Editor, http://ontolingua.stanford.edu/index.html.
17. PostgreSQL Home Page, http://www.postgresql.org/.
18. Protégé Editor, http://protege.stanford.edu/
19. Rodriguez, A., Egenhofer, M. Determining Semantic Similarity among Entity Classes from Different Ontologies. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, Vol.15(2), pp. 442-456, March/April 2003.
20. Stumme, G. and Madche, A. FCA-Merge: Bottom-up merging of ontologies. In 7th Intl. Conf. on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI '01), pages 225-230, Seattle, WA, 2001.
21. Visser, P., Jones, D., Bench-Capon, T., Shave, M. An Analysis of Ontology Mismatches; Heterogeneity versus Interoperability. AAAI Spring Symposium on Oncological Engineering, 1997.