Introduction: LSI as subject matter and as multidisciplinary confederation

Handbook of Language and Social Interaction

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 1-14

  Sanders, Robert E ^a  

^a STATE UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33646783354     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (33)

1. Chen, V. (1990-1991). Research on Language and Social Interaction, 24, 109-140.
2. Davidson, J. (1984). Subsequent versions of invitations, offers, requests and proposals dealing with actual or potential rejection. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action (pp. 102-128). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
3. Drew, P. (1984). Speakers' reportings in invitation sequences. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action (pp. 129-151). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
4. Drummond, K, & Hopper, R. (1993). Back channels revisited: Acknowledgment tokens and speakership incipiency. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 26, 157-177.
5. Edmondson, W. (1981). Spoken discourse: A model for analysis. London: Longman.
6. Fitch, K. L. (1994). A cross-cultural study of directive sequences and some implications for compliance-gaining research. Communication Monographs, 61, 185-209.
7. Goffman, E. (1959). The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.
8. Goldsmith, D. (1989-1990). Gossip from the native's point of view: A comparative analysis. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 23, 163-194.
9. Goodwin, C. (1981). Conversational organization: Interaction between speakers and hearers. New York: Academic Press.
10. Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole & J. L. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts (pp. 41-58). New York: Academic Press.
11. Holmes, J., & Meyerhoff, M. (1999). The community of practice: Theories and methodologies in language and gender research. Language in Society, 28, 173-183.
12. Hymes, D. (1974). Foundations of sociolinguistics: An ethnographic approach. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
13. Jefferson, G. (1993). Caveat speaker: Preliminary notes on recipient topic-shift implicature. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 26, 1-30.
14. Katriel, T. (1986). Talking straight: Dugri speech in Israeli Sabra culture. Cambridge, UK Cambridge University Press.
15. Katriel, T., & Philipsen, G. (1981). "What we need is communication": "Communication" as a cultural category in some American speech. Communication Monographs, 48, 301-317.
16. Kendon, A. (1990). Conductinginteraction: Patterns of behavior in focused encounters. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
17. Kendon, A. (1994). Do gestures communicate?: A review. [Special issue, A. Kendon, Ed., Gesture and understanding in social interaction]. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 27(3), 175-200.
18. Latour, B. (1994). On technical mediation. Common Knowledge, 3(2), 29-64.
19. Latour, B. (1996). On interobjectivity. Mind, Culture and Society, 3, 228-245.
20. Maynard, D. W. (1997). The news delivery sequence: Bad news and good news in conversational interaction. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 30, 93-130.
21. McNeill, D. (1985). So you think gestures are nonverbal? Psychological Review, 92, 350-371.
22. McNeill, D, Cassell.J., &McCullough, K-E. (1994). Communicative effects of mismatched gestures. [Special issue, A. Kendon, Ed., Gesture and understanding in social interaction]. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 27(3), 223-237.
23. Moerman, M. (1990-1991). Exploring talk and interaction. [Special section, R. Hopper, Ed., Ethnography and conversation analysis]. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 24, 173-187.
24. Pomerantz, A. (1984). Agreeing and disagreeing with assessments: Some features of preferred/dispreferred turn shapes. In J. M. Atkinson & J. Heritage (Eds.), Structures of social action (pp. 57-101). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
25. Pomerantz, A. (1986). Extreme case formulations: A way of legitimizing claims. Human Studies, 9, 219-229.
26. Pratt, S., & Wieder, D. L. (1993). The case of saying a few words and talking for another among the Osage people: 'Public speaking' as an object of ethnography. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 26, 353-408.
27. Rosaldo, M. (1990). The things we do with words: Ilongot speech acts and speech act theory in philosophy. In D. Carbaugh (Ed.), Cultural communication and intercultural contact (pp. 373-407). Hillsdale NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
28. Rosenberg, A. (1988). Philosophy of social science. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
29. Sanders, R. E. (forthcoming). Validating "observations" in discourse studies: A methodological reason for attention to cognition. In H. t. Molder &J. Potter (Eds.), Discourse and cognition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
30. Sanders, R. E., Fitch, K. L., & Pomerantz, A. (2000). Core research traditions within Language and Social Interaction. In W Gudykunst (Ed.), Communication Yearbook 24 (pp. 385-408). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31. Schegloff, E. A. (1996). Confirming allusions: Toward an empirical account of action. American Journal of Sociology, 102, 161-216.
32. Streeck, J. (1994). Gesture as communication II: The audience as co-author. [Special issue, A. Kendon, Ed., Gesture and understanding in social interaction]. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 27(3), 239-267.
33. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.