Hyperemesis gravidarum and patient satisfaction: A path model of patients' perceptions of the patient-physician relationship

Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics and Gynecology

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 49-57

  Munch, Shari ^a   Schmitz, Mark F ^b  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b TEMPLE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Hyperemesis gravidarum; Path model; Patient satisfaction; Patient physician relationship

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; DISEASE SEVERITY; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; ETIOLOGY; FEMALE; HEALTH BELIEF; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; HUMANISM; HYPEREMESIS GRAVIDARUM; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MEDICAL CARE; MEDICAL INFORMATION; METHODOLOGY; MODEL; PATH MODEL; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS;

ADULT; ATTITUDE; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYPEREMESIS GRAVIDARUM; PATIENT EDUCATION; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PATIENTS; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; PREGNANCY; PREGNANCY COMPLICATIONS; QUESTIONNAIRES;

EID: 33646758860     PISSN: 0167482X     EISSN: 17438942     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01674820500243633     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. McManus I, Gordon D, Winder B. Duties of a doctor: UK doctors and good medical practice. Qual Health Care 2000;9:14-22.
2. DiMatteo M, Reiter R, Gambone J. Enhancing medication adherence through communication and informed collaborative choice. Health Commun 1994;6:253-265.
3. Brody H. The healer's power. New Haven: Yale University Press; 1992.
4. Moore P, Adler N, Robertson P. Medical malpractice: The effect of doctor-patient communication on obstetric perceptions and malpractice intentions. West J Med 2000;173:244-250.
5. Moore P, Sickel A, Malat J, Williams D, Jackson J, Adler N. Psychosocial factors in medical and psychological treatment avoidance: The role of the doctor-patient relationship. J Health Psychol 2004;9:421-433.
6. Ross C, Steward C, Sinacore J. A comparative study of seven measures of patient satisfaction. Med Care 1995;33:392-406.
7. Urden L. Patient satisfaction measurement: Current issues and implications. Lippincotts Case Manag 2002;7:194-200.
8. Murray I, Wilcock A, Kobayashi L. Obstetrical patient satisfaction. J Health Care Mark 1996;16:54-57.
9. Handler A, Rosenberg D, Raube K, Lyons S. Prenatal care characteristics and African-American women's satisfaction with care in a managed care organization. Women's Health Issues 2003;13:93-103.
10. ACOG. Nausea and vomiting of pregnancy. The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG) Practice Bulletin No. 52. 2004;103:803-815.
11. Swallow B, Lindow S, Masson E, Hay D. Development of an instrument to measure nausea and vomiting in pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol 2002;22:481-485.
12. Munch S. Chicken or the egg? The biological-psychological controversy surrounding hyperemesis gravidarum. Soc Sci Med 2002;55:1267-1278.
13. O'Brien B, Naber S. Nausea and vomiting during pregnancy: Effects on the quality of women's lives. Birth 1992;19:138-143.
14. Bogen J. Neurosis: A MS-diagnosis. Perspect Biol Med 1994;32:263-272.
15. O'Brien B, Evans M, White-McDonald E. Isolation from 'being alive': Coping with severe nausea and vomiting of pregnancy. Nurs Res 2002;51:302-308.
16. Munch S. A qualitative analysis of physician humanism: Women's experiences with hyperemesis gravidarum. J Perinatol 2000;20:540-547.
17. Purdon T. Caring. Obstet Gynecol 2001;98:545-549.
18. Munch SL. Hyperemesis gravidarum and patient satisfaction: Patients' perceptions of the patient-physician relationship [dissertation]. East Lansing (MI): Michigan State University; 1998. Available from Dissertation Abstracts International 59(07), 3357B. University Microfilms, AAT9839680.
19. Fischer J, Corcoran K. Measures for clinical practice: Vol. 2, Adults. New York: Free Press; 1994.
20. Nunnally JC, Bernstein IH. Psychometric theory. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1994.
21. Munch S, Schmitz M. The Hyperemesis Beliefs Scale (HBS): A new instrument for assessing beliefs about severe nausea and vomiting in pregnancy. [Manuscript submitted 2006].
22. Hauck F, Zyzanski S, Alemagno S, Medalie J. Patient perceptions of humanism in physicians: Effects on positive health behaviors. Fam Med 1990;22:447-452.
23. Munch S. Women's experiences with a pregnancy complication: Causal explanations of hyperemesis gravidarum. Soc Work Health Care 2002;36:59-75.
24. Muthén L, Muthén B. Mplus user's guide. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén; 1998-2001.
25. Bollen K. Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley; 1989.
26. Hoyle R. Structural equation modeling: Concepts, issues, and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 1995.
27. Kline R. Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford; 1998.
28. Brody D, Miller S, Lerman C, Smith D, Lazaro C, Blum M. The relationship between patients' satisfaction with their physicians and perceptions about interventions they desired and received. Med Care 1989;27:1027-1035.
29. Zuskar D. The psychological impact of prenatal diagnosis of fetal abnormality: Strategies for investigation and intervention. Women Health 1987;12:91-103.
30. Roter D, Hall J. Doctors talking with patients/patients talking with doctors. Westport, CT: Auburn House; 1992.
31. Brody H. Stories of sickness. New Haven: Yale University Press; 1987.
32. Ventres W. Hearing the patient's story: Exploring physician-patient communication using narrative case reports. Fam Pract Res J 1994;14:139-147.
33. Bass M, Buck C, Turner L, Dickie G, Pratt G, Robinson H. The physician's actions and the outcome of illness in family practice. J Fam Pract 1986;23:43-47.
34. Keller V, Carroll J. A new model for physician-patient communication. Patient Educ Couns 1994;23:131-140.
35. Laerum E, Steine S, Morten F, Finset A. The final version of the Patient Perspective Survey (PPS): A new tool to improve consultation outcome and patient participation in general practice patients with complex health problems. Doctors' and patients' evaluation and guidelines for clinical use. Fam Pract 2002;19:264-271.
36. Seale C, Pattison S. Medical knowledge: Doubt and certainty. Buckingham: Open University Press; 1994.
37. DiMatteo M, Hays R. The significance of patients' perceptions of physician conduct: A study of patient satisfaction in a family practice center. J Community Health 1980;6:18-34.
38. van Teijlingen E, Hundley V, Rennie A, Graham W, Fitzmaurice A. Maternity satisfaction studies and their limitations: 'What is, must still be best'. Birth 2003;30:75-82.
39. Kenny D. Determinants of patient satisfaction with the medical consultation. Psychol Health 1995;10:427-437.
40. Carlson K. Primary care for women under managed care: Clinical issues. Women's Health Issues 1997;7:349-361.
41. Hoffman E, Maraldo P, Coons H, Johnson K. The women-centered health care team: Integrating perspectives from managed care, women's health, and health professional workforce. Women's Health Issues 1997;7:362-374.
42. Tarrant C, Windridge K, Boulton M, Baker R, Freeman G. Qualitative study of the meaning of personal care in general practice. Br Med J 2003;326:1310-1318.