Mono-disciplinary or multidisciplinary back pain guidelines? How can we achieve a common message in primary care?

European Spine Journal

Volumn 15, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 641-647

  Breen, Alan C ^a   Van Tulder, Maurits W ^b,c   Koes, Bart W ^d   Jensen, Irene ^e   Reardon, Rhoda ^c   Bronfort, Gert ^f  

^a ANGLO EUROPEAN COLLEGE OF CHIROPRACTIC   (United Kingdom)

^b VU UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^c INSTITUTE FOR WORK AND HEALTH   (Canada)

^d ERASMUS UNIVERSITY ROTTERDAM   (Netherlands)

^e KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

^f NORTHWESTERN HEALTH SCIENCES UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Back pain; Guidelines; Implementation; Primary Care

Indexed keywords

CONFERENCE PAPER; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HIGH RISK PATIENT; LOW BACK PAIN; MONITORING; PATIENT CARE; PILOT STUDY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIMARY MEDICAL CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROCESS DEVELOPMENT; RESEARCH;

BACK PAIN; CANADA; CAREGIVERS; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; HUMANS; INTERDISCIPLINARY COMMUNICATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PAIN CLINICS; PATIENT CARE TEAM; PRACTICE GUIDELINES; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE;

EID: 33646755433     PISSN: 09406719     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00586-005-0883-9     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) Collaborative Group (2000) Guideline Development in Europe. Int J Technol Assess Health Care 16(4):1039-1049
2. Barnett AG, Underwood MR, Vickers MR (1999) Effect of UK national guidelines on services to treat patients with acute low back pain: follow-up questionnaire survey. BMJ 318:919-920
3. Bird C (2000) Commissioned R & D Programmes: implementation of low back pain guidelines in North Thames. NHS Executive, London
4. Clinical Standards Advisory Group (CSAG) (1994) Epidemiology review: the epidemiology and cost of back pain. Department of Health, London
5. Eccles M, Grimshaw J (1995) Ensuring that guidelines change clinical practice. In: The development and implementation of clinical guidelines. Report of the Clinical Guidelines Working Group. Royal College of General Practitioners, Exeter, pp 12-15
6. Emslie CJ, Grimshaw J, Templeton A (1993) Do clinical guidelines improve general practice management and referral of infertile couples? BMJ 306:1728-1731
7. Evans DW, Foster NE, Vogel S, Breen AC, Pincus T (2003) Implementing evidence-based practice in the UK physical therapy professions: do they want it and do they feel they need it? In: Proceedings of the 5th international forum on low back pain research in primary care. Montreal, Canada
8. Grimshaw J, Freemantle N, Wallace S, Russell I, Hurwitz B, Watt I, Long A, Sheldon T (1995) Developing and implementing clinical practice guidelines. Quality Health Care 4:55-64
9. Grol R, Dalhuijsen J, Thomas S, in't Veld C, Rutten G, Mokkink H (1998) Attributes of clinical guidelines that influence use of guidelines in general practice: observational study. BMJ 317:858-861
10. Jamison RN, Gintner L, Rogers JF, Fairchild DG (2002) Disease management for chronic pain: barriers of program implementation with primary care physicians. Pain Med 3(2):92-101
11. Kitson A, Harvey G, McCormack B (1998) Enabling the implementation of evidence based practice: a conceptual framework. Quality Health Care 7:149-58
12. Langworthy J, Breen A (2003) Auditing the management of acute back pain in primary care: too late to preserve the momentum? In: Proceedings of the 32nd annual scientific meeting of the society for academic primary care, Manchester
13. Little P, Smith L, Cantrell T, Chapman J, Langridge J, Pickering R (1996) General practitioners' management of acute back pain: a survey of reported practice compared with clinical guidelines. BMJ 312:485-488
14. McDonald CJ, Hui SL, Smith DM, Tierney WM, Cohen SJ, Weinberger M, McCabe GP (1984) Reminders to physicians from an introspective computer trial. Ann Intern Med 100:130-138
15. McIntosh A, Shaw C (2003) Barriers to patient information provision in primary care: patients' and general practitioners' experiences and expectations of information for low back pain. Health Expect 6:19-29
16. National Institute for Clinical Excellence (2002) Principles for best practice in clinical audit. Radcliffe Medical Press Ltd, Oxford
17. NHS Centre for Reviews and Dissemination (1999) Effective Health Care 2: getting evidence into practice. University of New York
18. Oxman AD, Thomson MA, Davis DA, Haynes RB (1995) No magic bullets: a systematic review of 102 trials of interventions to improve professional practice. CMAJ 153:1423-1431
19. Pagliari H, Kahan JP (2003) Biomed II Concerted action on changing professional practice: a catalogue of survey items assessing attitudes towards guidelines and perceived barriers and facilitators to implementation. The CPP Perceptions Library
20. Royal College of General Practitioners, Clinical Guidelines Working Group (1995) The development and implementation of clinical guidelines. Royal College of General Practitioners, Exeter
21. Scheel IB, Hagen KB, Oxman AD (2002) Active sick leave for patients with back pain: all the players onside but still no action. Spine 27(6):654-659
22. Schers H, Braspenning J, Drijver R (2000) Low back pain in general practice: reported management and reasons for not adhering to the guidelines in the Netherlands. Br J Gen Pract 50:640-644
23. Sweeney G, Stead J, Sweeney K, Greco M (2000) Exploring the implementation and development of clinical governance in primary care within the South West Region: views from PCG Clinical Governance Leads. NHS Executive South West Region-Research & Development Support Unit, Exeter
24. Thorsen T, Makela M (1999) Changing professional practice: theory and practice of clinical guidelines implementation. Danish Institute for Health Services Research and Development
25. van Tulder MW, Croft PR, van Splunteren P, Miedema HS, Underwood MR, Hendricks HJM, Wyatt ME, Borkan JM (2002) Disseminating and implementing the results of back pain research. Spine 27(5):E121-E127
26. Watkins C, Harvey I, Langley C, Gray S, Faulkner A (1999) General practitioners' use of guidelines in the consultation and their attitudes to them. Br J Gen Pract 49:11-15