A new type of in situ single-molecule rectifier

ChemPhysChem

Volumn 7, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 1036-1040

  Kornyshev, Alexei A ^a   Kuznetsov, Alexander M ^b  

^a IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b FRUMKIN INSTITUTE OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY AND ELECTROCHEMISTRY   (Russian Federation)

Author keywords

Charge transport; Conducting materials; Electrochemistry; Electron tunneling; Single molecule studies

Indexed keywords

CHARGE TRANSFER; ELECTRIC POTENTIAL; ELECTROCHEMISTRY; ELECTROLYTES; ELECTRON TUNNELING; MOLECULES; RECTIFYING CIRCUITS;

CONDUCTING MATERIALS; ELECTRODE POTENTIALS; ELECTROLYTE SOLUTIONS; METALLIC ELECTRODES; POTENTIAL BARRIERS; SINGLE MOLECULE; SINGLE-MOLECULE STUDIES; TUNNEL CURRENTS;

ELECTROCHEMICAL ELECTRODES;

EID: 33646748687     PISSN: 14394235     EISSN: 14397641     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cphc.200500685     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. J. K. Jimzewski, C. Joachim, Science 1999, 283, 1683.
2. S. Datta, Electron transport in mesoscopic systems, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge UK, 1995.
3. S. S. Skourtis, D. N. Beratan, Adv. Chem. Phys. 1999, 106, 377.
4. A. Nitzan, Ann. Rev. Phys. Chem. 2001, 52, 681.
5. S. I. Pekar, Untersuchungen über der Elektronentheorie der Krystalle, Akademie-Verlag, Berlin, 1954.
6. R. R. Dogonadze in Reactions of Molecules at Electrodes (Ed.: N. S.Hush), Wiley-Interscience, New York, 1971, p. 135.
7. L. I. Schiff, Quantum Mechanics, 3rd ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, 1968.
8. A. M. Kuznetsov, Charge Transfer in Physics, Chemistry and Biology, Gordon & Breach, Reading, UK, 1995.
9. A. M. Kuznetsov, J. Ulstrup, Electron Transfer in Chemistry and Biology, Wiley, Chichester, 1999.
10. A. A. Kornyshev, A. M. Kuznetsov, J. Ulstrup, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2006, in press.
11. W. Haiss, H. van Zalinge, D. Bethell, D. J. Schiffrine, J. Ulstruo, R. Nichols, Faraday Discuss. 2005, 131, 253.
12. The notion of segments stands usually for the chain unit or a group of building blocks involved in a concerted fluctuation.
13. A. A. Kornyshev, A. M. Kuznetsov, Chem. Phys., DOI:10.1016/j.chemphys. 2005.11.042.
14. N. J. Tao, C. Z. Li, H. X. He, J. Electroanal. Chem. 2000, 492, 81.
15. X. Xiao, B. Xu, N. J. Tao, Angew. Chem. 2004, 116, 6274;
16. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 6148.
17. R. N. Barnett, C. L. Cleveland, . U. Landman, E. Boone, S. Kanvah, G. B. Schuster, J. Phys. Chem. A 2003, 107, 3525.
18. G. B. Schuster, U. Landman, Top. Curr. Chem. 2004, 236, 139.
19. D. L. Feldheim, C. D. Keating, Chem. Soc. Rev. 1998, 27, 1.
20. The distribution of potential and charge within the tunneling gap was extensively studied in the problem of electron transfer through molecular wires {see for example, S. K. Pati, J. Chem. Phys. 2003, 118, 6529;
21. N. D. Lang, P. Avouris, Nano Lett. 2003, 4, 737;
22. E. G. Emberley, G. Kirczenow, Ann. New York Acad. Sci. 2002, 960, 131; and ref. [4]}. These works dwelled on a potential distribution arising due to a large number of electrons flowing through the molecules with a feedback of the tunneling current on the potential distribution and vice versa. Nothing of this kind is considered herein as we concentrate on rare electrons affected by the potential established by the environment.
23. A distribution of potential in electrolyte solution near the STM tip was considered by W. Schmickler, D. Henderson, J. Electroanal. Chem. 1990, 290, 283. They modelled the tip by a metallic sphere and calculated the potential distribution in the linearized Poisson-Boltzmann approximation; the tunnel current in a bridge-free gap was calculated with the use of the electron density functional theory. The approach herein is simpler and straightforward with respect to the quantities under calculation.
24. It is well known that these potentials are not measurable within the thermodynamic approach, but in principle they can be calculated from the data of kinetic experiments, for example, electron photoemission into solution. The recommended absolute scales of potentials exist, although retrieving these potentials is model-dependent and requires high accuracy of measurements. For an update on this classical problem see O. A. Petrii, G. A. Tsirlina in Encyclopaedia of Electrochemistry, Vol. 1 (Eds.: E. Gileadi, M. Urbakh), Wiley-VCH, Weinheim, 2002, p. 3.
25. 0 are determined exclusively by the metal/electrolyte electron work functions of the corresponding electrodes. For the case of a vacuum gap, these are simply metal/vacuum work functions.
26. S. N. Yaliraki, M. Ratner, J. Chem. Phys. 1998, 109, 5036.
27. S. N. Yaliraki, M. Kemp, M. A. Ratner, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 1999, 121 3428.
28. A. A. Kornyshev, A. M. Kuznetsov, Electrochem. Comm., DOI: 10.1016/j.elecom.2006.02.018.