Identification of the adverse effect of nitrate on the phosphate release rate and improvement of EBPR process models

Water Science and Technology

Volumn 53, Issue 4-5, 2006, Pages 115-123

  Lee, S H ^a   Ko, J H ^b   Kim, J R ^a   Kim, Y J ^a   Lee, J J ^a   Kim, C W ^a   Lee, T H ^c  

^a Pusan National University   (South Korea)

^b POSCO   (South Korea)

^c Andong National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

ASM3; EAWAG bio P module; EBPR; Nitrate inhibition; P release

Indexed keywords

DENITRIFICATION; FERMENTATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PHOSPHORUS; REMOVAL;

ENHANCED BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL; NITRATE INHIBITION;

NITRATES;

NITRATE; PHOSPHATE; PHOSPHORUS; VOLATILE FATTY ACID;

DENITRIFICATION; FERMENTATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NITRATES; PHOSPHORUS; REMOVAL;

DENITRIFICATION; INHIBITION; NITRATE; PHOSPHATE;

ACCURACY; ACTIVATED SLUDGE; ANAEROBIC METABOLISM; ARTICLE; CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; CONSTANTS AND COEFFICIENTS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DENITRIFICATION; ENHANCED BIOLOGICAL PHOSPHORUS REMOVAL; FERMENTATION; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; PROCESS MODEL; PROCESS OPTIMIZATION; SEQUENCING BATCH REACTOR; SIMULATION; SLUDGE TREATMENT; VALIDATION STUDY;

BACTERIA, ANAEROBIC; BIOREACTORS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; NITRATES; PHOSPHATES;

EID: 33646747399     PISSN: 02731223     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.2166/wst.2006.116     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Barker, P.S. and Dold, P.L. (1996). Denitrification behaviour in biological phosphorous removal activated sludge system-review paper. Wat. Res., 30(4), 769-780.
2. Gerber, A., Mostert, E.S. Winter, C.T. and de Villiers, R.H. (1986). The effect of acetate and other short chain carbon compounds on the kinetics of biological nutriet removal. Water SA, 12, 7-12.
3. Gerber, A., de Villiers, R.H., Mostert, E.S. and van Riet, C.J. (1987). The phenomenon of simultaneous phosphate uptake and release, and its importance in biological nutrient removal. Biological Phosphate Removal from Wastewaters (AWPCNo.21) Ed. R. Ramadori, IAWPRC/Pergamon Press, London. pp 123-134.
4. Henze, M., Gujer, W., Mino, T. and van Loosdrecht, M.C.M. (2000). Activated Sludge Models: ASM1, ASM2, ASM2d and ASM3, IWA Publishing, London.
5. PT) concept model. Wat. Sci. Tech., 43(7), 65-72.
6. H) in swine wastewater. In Preprints of IWA 4th World Water Congress, Marrakech, 19-24 September, Morocco.
7. Lee, S.H., Ko, J.H., Pak, J.B., Im, J.H., Kim, C.W. and Woo, H.J (2005a). Practice of ASM3 and EAWAG Bio-P module for simulating five-stage step-feed EBPR process comparing with ASM2d. Preprints of ICA2005, 29 May-2 June, Busan, Korea.
8. Lee, S.H., Ko, J.H., Poo, K.M., T.H., Kim, C.W. and Woo, H.J. (2006). Practical approach of parameter estimation for ASM3 + bio-P module applied to five stage step-feed EBPR process. Wat. Sci. Technol., 53(1), 139-148.
9. Rieger, L., Koch, G., Kuhni, M., Gujer, W. and Siegrist, H. (2001). The EAWAG bio-P module for activated model No. 3. Wat. Res., 35, 3887-3903.
10. Seviour, R.J., Mino, T. and Onuki, M. (2003). The microbiology of biological removal in activated sludge systems. FEMS Microbiol. Rev., 27(1), 99-127.