A role for set when naming Arabic numerals: How intentionality limits (putatively automatic) performance

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 12, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 1076-1081

  Ansari, Imran ^a   Besner, Derek ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WATERLOO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33646746826     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03206446     Document Type: Review

References (14)

1. ALLPORT, D. A., STYLES, E. H., & HSIEH, S. (1994). Shifting intentional set: Exploring the dynamic control of tasks. In C. Umiltà & M. Moscovitch (Eds.), Conscious and nonconscious information processing: Attention and performance XV (pp. 421-452). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
2. BESNER, D., & CARE, S. (2003). A paradigm for exploring what the mind does while deciding what it should do. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57, 311-320.
3. BESNER, D., & RISKO, E. F. (2005). Stimulus-response compatible orienting and the effect of an action not taken: Perception delayed is automaticity denied. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 271-275.
4. BROWN, T. L., GORE, C. L., & CARR, T. H. (2002). Visual attention and word recognition in Stroop color naming: Is word recognition "automatic"? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 131, 220-240.
5. FROST, R. (1998). Toward a strong phonological theory of visual word recognition: True issues and false trails. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 71-99.
6. FROST, R. (2003). The robustness of phonological effects in fast priming. In S. Kinoshita & S. J. Lupker (Eds.), Masked priming: The state of the art (pp. 173-191). New York: Psychology Press.
7. KINOSHITA, S., & LUPKER, S. (2003). Masked priming: The state of the art (Macquarie Monographs in Cognitive Science). New York: Psychology Press.
8. MARCEL, A. J. (1983). Conscious and unconscious perception: An approach to the relations between phenomenal experience and perceptual processes. Cognitive Psychology, 15, 238-300.
9. NEELY, I. H., & KAHAN, T. A. (2001). Is semantic activation automatic? A critical re-evaluation. In H. L. Roediger III, J. S. Nairne, I. Neath, & A. M. Surprenant (Eds.), The nature of remembering: Essays in honor of Robert G. Crowder (pp. 69-93). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
10. PASHLER, H., & JOHNSTON, J. C. (1989). Chronometric evidence for central postponement in temporally overlapping tasks. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 41A, 19-45.
11. POSNER, M. I., & SNYDER, C. R. R. (1975). Attention and cognitive control. In R. L. Solso (Ed.), Information processing and cognition: The Loyola Symposium (pp. 55-85). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
12. ROGERS, R. D., & MONSELL, S. (1995). Cost of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 207-231.
13. STERNBERG, S. (1969). The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders' method. Acta Psychologica, 30, 276-315.
14. WASZAK, F., HOMMEL, B., & ALLPORT, A. (2004). Semantic generalization of stimulus-task bindings. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 1027-1033.