A fudge? Network rail's status in the rail industry

Public Money and Management

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 148-150

  Jupe, Robert ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KENT   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33646743335     PISSN: 09540962     EISSN: 14679302     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9302.2006.00515.x     Document Type: Review

References (13)

1. Crompton, G. and Jupe, R. (2002), Delivering better transport? An evaluation of the 10-year plan for the railway industry. Public Money & Management, 22, 3, pp. 41-48.
2. Department for Transport (2004), The Future of Rail, Cm 6233 (The Stationery Office, London).
3. Department for Transport (2005), Contingent Liabilities for Network Rail Borrowing, Departmental minute 9 August (DfT, London).
4. Ford, R. (2005), Regulatory role reversed in Labour's Railways Bill. Modern Railways (January), pp. 14-15.
5. House of Commons (2004), Select Committee on Transport, The Future of the Railway, HC 145-I, Vol. 1 (The Stationery Office, London).
6. House of Commons (2005), Select Committee on Public Accounts, Network Rail: Making a Fresh Start, HC 556 (The Stationery Office, London).
7. Jupe, R. (2005), The future of rail? An evaluation of the 2004 railway industry white paper. Public Money & Management, 25, 3, pp. 187-194.
8. National Audit Office (2004), Network Rail - Making a Fresh Start, HC 532 (The Stationery Office, London).
9. Network Rail (2005), Business Plan Summary (Network Rail, London).
10. ORR (2004), Access Charges Review 2003: Regulator's Approval of Network Rail's Proposed Financing Arrangements (London).
11. Wolmar, C. (2004), Review couples too much caution with too little clarity. Rail, 493 (4 August-17 August), pp. 32-33.
12. Wolmar, C. (2005), On the Wrong Line: How Ideology and Incompetence Wrecked Britain's Railways (Aurum Press, London).
13. Wright, R. and Giles, C. (2006), LCR reclassification could be light at the end of the tunnel for Treasury. Financial Times (21 February), p. 2.