The rise of global science and the emerging political economy of international research collaborations

European Journal of Education

Volumn 41, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 225-244

  Peters, Michael A ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33646739288     PISSN: 01418211     EISSN: 14653435     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1465-3435.2006.00257.x     Document Type: Review

References (64)

1. ALBERTS, B. M. (1998) Toward a global science, Issues in Science and Technology, 14, pp. 25-28.
2. ARNOLD, D. & GUHA, R. (Eds.) (1996) Nature, Culture, Imperialism: Essays on the Environmental History of South Asia (Studies in Social Ecology and Environmental History) (Oxford, Oxford University Press).
3. ARNOLD, D. (1988) (Ed) Imperial Medicine and Indigenous Societies (Manchester, Manchester University Press).
4. ARNOLD, DAVID (1993) Colonizing the Body: State Medicine and Epidemic Disease in Nineteenth-Century India (University of California Press).
5. BENKLER, Y. (2004) Sharing nicely: on shareable goods and the emergence of sharing as a modality of economic production. The Yale Law Journal, 114 pp. 273-358. Also at: http://www.yalelawjournal.org/pdf/1142/Benkler_FINAL_YLJ114-2. pdf.
6. BEWELL, A. (1999) Romanticism and Colonial Disease (Baltimore and London, The Johns Hopkins University Press).
7. BLOOR, D. (1991) [1976] Knowledge and Social Imagery (Chicago, University of Chicago Press).
8. BRICMONT, J. & SOKAL, A. D. (1998) Fashionable Nonsense: Post-modern Intellectuals' Abuse of Science (New York, Picador).
9. BROMLEY, A. D. & LUBELL, M. S. (2003) Science's growing political strength, Issues in Science and Technology, 19, pp. 13-16.
10. BUSCH, P. (2000) Nietzsche's Political Critique of Modern Science, Perspectives on Political Science, 29, pp. 197-210.
11. CHAMBERS, D. W. & GILLESPIE, R. (2000) Locality in the history of science: colonial science, technoscience, and indigenous knowledge, Osiris, Annual, pp. 221-242.
12. COHEN, H. (2003) ICSU: International Council for Science, The Scientist, 8, pp. 14-15.
13. CRESPI, G. & GEUNA, A. (2004) The Productivity of Science: an International Analysis (SPRU).
14. CRESPI, G. & GEUNA, A. (2005) Modelling and Measuring Scientific Production: Results for a Panel of OECD Countries (SPRU).
15. CROSBY, A. (1986) The Columbian Exchange: Biological and Cultural Consequences of 1492 (Cambridge & New York, Cambridge University Press).
16. CROSBY, A. (2004) Ecological Imperialism: The Biological Expansion of Europe, 900-1900 (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).
17. DICKSON, D. (1987) OECD to set rules for international science, Science, Nov 6, vol 238, pp. 743-744.
18. DICKSON, D. (1999) Open house or closed shop? UNESCO Courier, May, pp. 25-27.
19. FJÂLLBRANT, N. (1997) Scholarly Communication - Historical Development and New Possibilities at http://www.iqtul.org/conference/ proceedings/vo107/papers/full/nfpaper.html.
20. FULLER, S. (1993) Philosophy, Rhetoric and the End of Knowledge: The Coming of Science and Technology Studies (Madison, University of Wisconsin Press).
21. FULLER, S. (2000) Thomas Kuhn: A Philosophical History for our Times (Chicago, University of Chicago Press).
22. FUNTOWICZ, S. O. & RAVETZ, J. R. (1992) Three types of risk assessment and the emergence of post-normal science, in: S. KRIMSKY & GOLDING (Eds) Social Theories of Risk (Westport CT Greenwood) pp. 251-273.
23. GADGIL, M. & GUHA, R. (1995) Ecology and Equity:The Use and Abuse of Nature in Contemporary India (New Delhi: Penguin Books India).
24. GARFIELD, E. (1970) Citation Indexing for Studying Science, Nature, 227, pp. 669-671.
25. GARFIELD, E. (1972) Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation, Science, 178, pp. 471-479.
26. GASCOIGNE, J. (1994) Banks and the English Enlightenment: Useful Knowledge and Polite Culture (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).
27. GASCOIGNE, J. (1998) Science in the Service of Empire: Joseph Banks, the British State and the Uses of Science in the Age of Revolution (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).
28. GLAZEBROOK, T. (2000) Heidegger's Philosophy of Science (New York, Fordham University Press).
29. GOONATILAKE, S. (1984) Aborted Discovery: Science and Creativity in the Third World (London, Zed).
30. GOONATILAKE, S. (1995) Toward a Global Science: mining civilizational knowledge (New Delhi, Vistaar Publications).
31. GREENHILL, K. M. (2000) American science policy since World War II, Polity, 32, pp. 633-645.
32. GROVE, R. (1997) Ecology, Climate, and Empire: Colonialism and Global Environmental History (Cambridge, White Horse Press).
33. GROVE, R. H. (1995) Green Imperialism: Colonial Expansion, Tropical Island Edens and the Origins of Environmentalism, 1600-1860 (Cambridge & New York, Cambridge University Press).
34. GUEDON, J-C. (2001) In Oldenburg's Long Shadow: Librarians, Research Scientists, Publishers, and the Control of Scientific Publishing http://www.arl.org/arl/proceedings/138/guedon.html#v
35. HARDING, S. (1993) (Ed) The 'Racial' Economy of Science (Bloomington, Indiana University Press).
36. HARDING, S. (1998) Is Science Multicultural? (Bloomington, Indiana University Press).
37. HARDING, S. (2003) Science and Technology in a Multicultural and Postcolonial World: Gender Issues http://www.unb.br/ih/his/gefem/labrys3/web/ fran/sandra2.htm
38. HARRISON, M. (1999) Climates and Constitutions: Health, Race, Environment and British Imperialism in India 1600-1850 (Oxford, Oxford University Press).
39. HARRISON, M. (1994) Public Health in British India: Anglo-Indian Preventive Medicine, 1857-1914 (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press).
40. HEIDEGGER, M. (1977) The Question Concerning Technology (trans. W. Lovitt) (NewYork, Harper and Row).
41. HENRY, J. (2002) Knowledge is Power: How Magic, the Government and an Apocalyptic Vision inspired Francis Bacon to create Modern Science (Cambridge, Icon Books).
42. KUHN, T. (1962) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (Chicago, University of Chicago Press).
43. KUHN, T. S. (1970) The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, 2d. ed. (Chicago, University of Chicago Press).
44. LYOTARD, J-F. (1984) The Postmodern Condition: A Report on Knowledge (Manchester, Manchester University Press).
45. NANDY, A. (1988) (Ed) Science, Hegemony, and Violence: A Requiem for Modernity (New York, Oxford University Press). Also at http://www.unu.edu/ unupress/unupbooks/uu05se/uu05se00.htm.
46. PARK, P. (2002) Toward a United Nations of science: US science board calls for more than international collaboration funding, The Scientist, May 13, 16 (no. 10), pp. 8-10.
47. PETERS, M. A. & BESLEY, T. (2006) Building Knowledge Cultures (Boulder, Rowman & Littlefield).
48. PETERS, M. A. (1996) (Ed) Education and the Postmodern Condition. Foreword by J-F. Lyotard (Westport, CT, and London, Bergin & Garvey).
49. PETITJEAN, P. et al. (1992) Science and Empires: Historical Studies about Scientific Development and European Expansion (Dordrecht, Kluwer).
50. PRICE, D. J. DE SOLLA (1963) Little Science, Big Science (New York and London, Columbia University Press).
51. RAVETZ, J. R. (1996) Scientific Knowledge and its Social Problems, with a new introduction by the author (New Brunswick, N.J., Transaction Publishers). (Orig 1971).
52. REHBOCK, P. I. (2001) Globalizing the History of Science, Journal of World History, 12, pp. 183-193.
53. ROUSE, J. (1987) Knowledge and Power: Toward a Political Philosophy of Science. (Ithaca, New York, Cornell University Press).
54. SELECT COMMITTEE ON SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY (UK) (2003) Scientific Publishing http://www.publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200304/cmselect/cmsctech/ 399/39902.htm
55. SEN, A. (2002) The science of give and take, New Scientist, 174, pp. 51-54.
56. SIMONS, K. & FEATHERSTONE, C. (2000) Science in Europe, Science, Nov 10, vol 290 no 5494, pp. 1099-1101.
57. SOKAL, A. D. (1996) Transgressing the boundaries, Social Text, 14, pp. 217-252.
58. STIGLITZ, J. (1999) Knowledge as a Global Public Good (Washington, World Bank). http://www.worldbank.org/knowledge/chiefecon/articles/undpk2/index.htm
59. TEICH, M. (1996) The 20th-century scientific-technical revolution, History Today, 46, pp. 27-34.
60. TUDGE, C. (2004) The honesty of science is being compromised at every turn: can we still rely on what scientists tell us? Alas, no. Their conferences and papers are sponsored by industry, their bad results are concealed, their jobs are threatened if they step out of line, New Statesman, April 26, 133, pp. 29-32.
61. WAGNER, P. (2004) A History and Theory of the Social Sciences: Not All that is Solid Melts into Air (Thousand Oaks, CA., Sage).
62. WAGNER, P. & WITTROCK, B. (1991) States, institutions and discourses: a comparative perspective on the structruration of the social sciences, in: P. WAGNER, B. WITTROCK & R. WHITLEY (Eds.) Discourses on Society. The Shaping of the Social Science Disciplines (Dardrecht, Kluwer). pp. 331-357.
63. WANG, J. (2002) Scientists and the problem of the public in Cold War America, 1945-1960, Osiris, Annual, pp. 323-49.
64. WATSON-VERRAN, H. & TURNBULL, D. (1995) Science and Other Indigenous Knowledge Systems, in: S. JASANOFF, G. E. MARKLE, J. C. PETERSON & T. PINCH (Eds) Handbook of Science and Technology Studies (Thousand Oaks, Sage).