Erratum: Lumbar spinal fusion patients' demands to the primary health sector: Evaluation of three rehabilitation protocols. A prospective randomized study (European Spine Journal (2005) DOI: 10.1007/s00586-005-0884-8);Lumbar spinal fusion patients' demands to the primary health sector: Evaluation of three rehabilitation protocols. A prospective randomized study

European Spine Journal

Volumn 15, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 648-656

  Soegaard, Rikke ^a   Christensen, Finn B ^a   Lauersen, Ida ^a   Bünger, Cody E ^a  

^a AARHUS UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Costs and cost analysis; Lumbar spinal fusion; Primary care; Rehabilitation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; EVALUATION; FEMALE; GROUP THERAPY; HEALTH CARE COST; HEALTH CARE UTILIZATION; HEALTH INSURANCE; HIGH RISK PATIENT; HOSPITAL COST; HUMAN; KINESIOTHERAPY; LUMBAR SPINE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PHYSIOTHERAPY; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REHABILITATION MEDICINE; SPINE FUSION;

EID: 33646738711     PISSN: 09406719     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00586-006-1079-7     Document Type: Erratum

References (24)

1. Christensen FB, Hansen ES, Eiskjaer SP, Hoy K, Helmig P, Neumann P et al (2002) Circumferential lumbar spinal fusion with Brantigan cage versus posterolateral fusion with titanium Cotrel-Dubousset instrumentation: a prospective, randomized clinical study of 146 patients. Spine 23:2674-2683
2. Christensen FB, Hansen ES, Laursen M, Thomsen K, Bunger CE (2002) Long-term functional outcome of pedicle screw instrumentation as a support for posterolateral spinal fusion: randomized clinical study with a 5-year follow-up. Spine 12:1269-1277
3. Christensen FB, Laurberg I, Bünger CE (2003) Importance of the back-cafe concept to rehabilitation after lumbar spinal fusion: a randomized clinical study with a 2-year follow-up. Spine 28:2561-2569
4. Fritzell P, Hagg O, Wessberg P, Nordwall A (2001) 2001 Volvo Award Winner in clinical studies: Lumbar fusion versus nonsurgical treatment for chronic low back pain: a multicenter randomized controlled trial from the Swedish Lumbar Spine Study Group. Spine 23:2521-2532
5. Fritzell P, Hagg O, Wessberg P, Nordwall A (2002) Chronic low back pain and fusion: a comparison of three surgical techniques: a prospective multicenter randomized study from the Swedish lumbar spine study group. Spine 11:1131-1141
6. Goossens ME, Rutten-Van Molken MP, Kole-Snijders AM, Vlaeyen JW, Van Breukelen G, Leidl R (1998) Health economic assessment of behavioural rehabilitation in chronic low back pain: a randomised clinical trial. Health Econ 1:39-51
7. Graves N, Walker D, Raine R, Hutchings A, Roberts JA (2002) Cost data for individual patients included in clinical studies: no amount of statistical analysis can compensate for inadequate costing methods. Health Econ 8:735-739
8. Guzman J, Esmail R, Karjalainen K, Malmivaara A, Irvin E, Bombardier C (2001) Multidisciplinary rehabilitation for chronic low back pain: systematic review. BMJ 7301:1511-1516
9. Jefferson T, Smith R, Yee Y, Drummond M, Pratt M, Gale R (1998) Evaluating the BMJ guidelines for economic submissions: prospective audit of economic submissions to BMJ and the Lancet. JAMA 3:275-277
10. Kole-Snijders AM, Vlaeyen JW, Goossens ME, Rutten-Van Molken MP, Heuts PH, Van Breukelen G et al (1999) Chronic low-back pain: what does cognitive coping skills training add to operant behavioral treatment? Results of a randomized clinical trial. J Consult Clin Psychol 6:931-944
11. Krasnik A, Hansen E, Keiding N, Sawitz A (1997) Determinants of general practice utilization in Denmark. Dan Med Bull 5:542-546
12. Maetzel A, Li L (2002) The economic burden of low back pain: a review of studies published between 1996 and 2001. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol 1:23-30
13. Maniadakis N, Gray A (2000) The economic burden of back pain in the UK. Pain 1:95-103
14. Moller H, Hedlund R (2000) Surgery versus conservative management in adult isthmic spondylolisthesis - a prospective randomized study: part 1. Spine 13:1711-1715
15. Moller H, Hedlund R (2000) Instrumented and noninstrumented posterolateral fusion in adult spondylolisthesis - a prospective randomized study: part 2. Spine 13:1716-1721
16. OECD Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2002) Purchasing power parities and real expenditures - 1999 Benchmark Year. OECD Report no. 7
17. Ostelo RW, de Vet HC, Waddell G, Kerckhoffs MR, Leffers P, van Tulder M (2003) Rehabilitation following first-time lumbar disc surgery: a systematic review within the framework of the cochrane collaboration. Spine 3:209-218
18. Schmidt B, Kolip P, Greitemann B (2001) Gender-specific aspects in chronic low back pain rehabilitation. Rehabilitation (Stuttg) 5:261-266
19. Schreyer P, Koechlin F (2002) Purchasing power parities - measurement and uses. OECD Report no. 3
20. Skouen JS, Grasdal AL, Haldorsen EM, Ursin H (2002) Relative cost-effectiveness of extensive and light multidisciplinary treatment programs versus treatment as usual for patients with chronic low back pain on long-term sick leave: randomized controlled study. Spine 9:901-909
21. The Danish National Board of Health [database and e-publication on the internet] (2004) The Danish National Board of Health: Casemix int. c2004 [cited 2004 Aug 19]. Available from http://www.sst.dk/Planlaegning_og_behandling/DRG. aspx?lang=da
22. The National Health Insurance Board [Takstkortoversigt] (1-10-2002) The Danish National Health Insurance Board. The Danish National Board of Health
23. van Tulder MW, Ostelo R, Vlaeyen JW, Linton SJ, Morley SJ, Assendelft WJ (2000) Behavioral treatment for chronic low back pain: a systematic review within the framework of the Cochrane Back Review Group. Spine 20:2688-2699
24. Vlaeyen JW, Haazen IW, Schuerman JA, Kole-Snijders AM, van Eek H (1995) Behavioural rehabilitation of chronic low back pain: comparison of an operant treatment, an operant-cognitive treatment and an operant-respondent treatment. Br J Clin Psychol 34:95-118