Advances in model-based fault diagnosis with evolutionary algorithms and neural networks

International Journal of Applied Mathematics and Computer Science

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 85-99

  Witczak, Marcin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZIELONA GÓRA   (Poland)

Author keywords

Evolutionary algorithms; Fault diagnosis; Neural networks; Robustness

Indexed keywords

ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE; BENCHMARKING; EVOLUTIONARY ALGORITHMS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; NEURAL NETWORKS; ROBUSTNESS (CONTROL SYSTEMS);

CLASSICAL COMPUTING METHODS; MODEL-BASED FAULT DIAGNOSIS; SOFT COMPUTING METHODS;

FAILURE ANALYSIS;

EID: 33646738241     PISSN: 1641876X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (64)

1. Alessandri A., Parisini T. and Zoppoli R (1997): Neural approximators for non-linear finite-memory state estimation. - Int. J. Contr., Vol. 67, No. 2, pp. 275-302.
2. Atkinson A.C. and Donev A.N. (1992): Optimum Experimental Designs. - New York: Oxford University Press.
3. Bäck T., Hammel U. and Schwefel H.P. (1997): Evolutionary computation: Comments on the history and current state. - IEEE Trans. Evolut. Computat., Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 3-17
4. Blanke M., Kinnaert M., Lunze J. and Staroswiecki M. (2003): Diagnosis and Fault-Tollerant Control. - Berlin: Springer
5. Chandra P. and Sing Y. (2004): Feedforward sigmoidal networks - Equicontinuity and fault tolerance. - IEEE Trans. Neural Netw., Vol. 15, No. 6, pp. 1350-1366.
6. Chen J. and Patton R. J. (1999): Robust Model-based Fault Diagnosis for Dynamic Systems. - London: Kluwer.
7. Chen J., Patton R. J. and Liu G.P. (1996): Optimal residual design for fault diagnosis using multi-objective optimization and genetic algorithms. - Int. J. Syst. Sci., Vol. 27, No. 6, pp. 567-576.
8. Chen Z., He Y., Chu F. and Huang J. (2003): Evolutionary strategy for classification problems and its application in fault diagnosis. - Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell., Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 31-38.
9. Cohn D.A. (1994): Neural network exploration using optimal experimental design, In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 6 (J. Cowan et al., Eds.). - San Mateo: Morgan Kaufman.
10. Chryssolouris G., Lee M. and Ramsey A. (1996): Confidence interval prediction for neural network models. - IEEE Trans. Neural Netw., Vol. 7, No. 1, pp. 229-232.
11. DAMADICS (2004): Website of DAMADICS: Development and Application of Methods for Actuator Diagnosis in Industrial Control Systems. http:// diag.mchtr.pw.edu.pl/damadics/.
12. Delebecque F., Nikoukah R. and Rubio Scola H. (2003): Test signal design for failure detection: A linear programming approach. - Int. J. Appl. Math. Comput. Sci., Vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 515-526.
13. Fedorov V.V., and Hackl P. (1997): Model-Oriented Design of Experiments. - New York: Springer.
14. Fleming P.J. and Purshouse (2002): Evolutionary algorithms in control systems engineering: A survey. - Contr. Eng. Pract., Vol. 10, No. 11, pp. 1223-1241.
15. Fogel D.B. (1995): Evolutionary Computation: Toward a New Philosophy of Machine Intelligence. - New York: Willey-IEEE Press.
16. Fogel L.J., Owens A.J. and Walsh M.J. (1999): An overview of evolutionary programming, In: Evolutionary Algorithms (De Jong K., Vose M.D. and Whitley L.D., Eds.). - Heidelberg: Springer.
17. Frank P.M. and Köppen-Seliger (1997): New developments using AI in fault diagnosis. - Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell., Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 3-14.
18. Frank P.M., Schreier G. and Garcia E.A. (1999): Non-linear observers for fault detection and isolation, In: New Directions in Non-linear Observer Design (Nijmeijer H., Fossen T.I., Eds.). - Berlin: Springer.
19. Fuente M.J. and Saludes S. (2000): Fault detection and isolation in a non-linear plant via neural networks. - Proc. Symp. Fault Detection, Supervision and Safety for Technical Processes, SAFEPROCESS, Budapest, Hungary, pp. 472-477.
20. Fukumizu K. (1996): Active learning in multilayer perceptrons, In: Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (D.S. Touretzky et al., Eds.). - Cambridge: MIT Press, pp. 295-301.
21. Fukumizu K. (2000): Statistical active learning in multilayer perceptrons. - IEEE Trans. Neural Netw., Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 17-26.
22. Galar R. (1989): Evolutionary search with soft selection. - Biol. Cybern., Vol. 60, No. 1, pp. 124-141.
23. Goodwin G.C. and Payne R.L. (1977): Dynamic Systems Identification. Experiment Design and Data Analysis. - New York: Acadamic Presss.
24. Gray G. J, Murray-Smith D. J., Li Y., Sharman K. C. and Weinbrenner T. (1998): Non-linear model structure identification using genetic programming. - Contr. Eng. Pract., Vol. 6, No. 11, pp. 1341-1352.
25. Guo L.Z. and Zhu Q.M. (2002): A fast convergent extended Kalman observer for non-linear discrete-time systems. - Int. J. Syst. Sci., Vol. 33, No. 13, pp. 1051-1058.
26. Gupta M.M., Jin L. and Homma N. (2003): Static and Dynamic Neural Networks. From Fundamentals to Advanced Theory. - Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
27. Holland J.H. (1975): Adaptation in Natural and Artificial Systems. - Ann Arbor, MI: The University of Michigan Press.
28. Hunt K.J., Sbarbaro D., Zbikowski R. and Gawthrop P.J. (1992): Neural networks for control systems - A survey. - Automatica, Vol. 28, No. 6, pp. 1083-1112.
29. Ivakhnenko A.G. and Mueller J.A. (1995): Self-organizing of nets of active neurons. - Syst. Anal. Modell. Simul., Vol. 20, pp. 93-106.
30. Janczak A. (2005): Identification of Non-Linear Systems Using Neural Networks and Polynomial Models: A Block Oriented Approach. - Berlin: Springer.
31. Karpenko M., Sepehri N. and Scuse D. (2003): Diagnosis of process valve actuator faults using a multilayer neural network. - Contr. Eng. Practice, Vol. 11, No. 11, pp. 1289-1299.
32. Korbicz J., Kościelny J.M., Kowalczuk Z. and Cholewa W. (Eds.) (2004): Fault Diagnosis. Models, Artificial Intelligence, Applications. - Berlin: Springer.
33. Kowalczuk Z., Suchomski P. and Białaszewski T. (1999): Evolutionary muti-objective Pareto optimization of diagnostic state observers. - Int. J. Appl. Math. Comput. Sci., Vol. 9, No. 3, pp. 689-709.
34. Koza J. R. (1992): Genetic Programming: On the Programming of Computers by Means of Natural Selection. - Cambridge: The MIT Press.
35. Le T.T., Watton J. and Pham D.T. (1997): An artificial neural network based approach to fault diagnosis and classification of fluid power systems. - J. Syst. Contr. Eng., Vol. 211, No. 4, pp. 307-317.
36. Le T.T., Watton J. and Pham D.T. (1998): Fault classification of fluid power systems using a dynamics feature extraction technique and neural networks. - J. Syst. Contr. Eng., Vol. 212, No. 2, pp. 87-97.
37. MacKay D. (1992): Information-based objective functions for active data selection. - Neural Comput., Vol. 4, No. 4, pp. 305-318.
38. Marcu T. (1997): A multiobjective evolutionary approach to pattern recognition for robust diagnosis of process faults. - Proc. Symp. Fault Detection, Supervision and Safety for Technical Processes, SAFEPROCESS, Hull, UK, pp. 1183-1188.
39. Metenidis M.F., Witczak M. and Korbicz J. (2004): A novel genetic programming approach to non-linear system modelling: Application to the DAMADICS benchmark problem. - Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell., Vol. 17, No. 4, pp. 363-370.
40. Michalewicz Z. (1996): Genetic Algorithms + Data Structures = Evolution Programs. - Berlin: Springer.
41. Milanese M., Norton J., Piet-Lahanier H. and Walter E. (Eds.) (1996): Bounding Approaches to System Identification. - New York: Plenum Press.
42. Miller J.A., Potter W.D., Gandham R.V. and Lapena C.N. (1993): An evaluation of local improvement operators for genetic algorithms. - IEEE Trans. Syst. Man and Cybern., Vol. 23, No. 5, pp. 1340-1351.
43. Mrugalski M. and Witczak M. (2002): Parameter estimation of dynamic GMDH neural networks with the bounded-error technique. - J. Appl. Comput. Sci., Vol. 10, No. 1, pp. 77-90.
44. Narendra K.S. and Parthasarathy K. (1990): Identification and control of dynamical systems using neural networks. - IEEE Trans. Neural Netw., Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 1-27.
45. Patan K. and Parisini T. (2005): Identification of neural dynamic models for fault detection and isolation: The case of a real sugar evaporation process. - J. Proc. Contr., Vol. 15, No. 1, pp. 67-79.
46. Porter L.L. and Passino K.M. (1995): Genetic adaptive observers. - Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell., Vol. 8, No. 3, pp. 261-269.
47. Ruano A.E. (Ed.) (2005): Intelligent Control Systems Using Computational Intelligence Techniques. - London: The IEE Press.
48. Sjoberg J., Zhang Q., Ljung L., Benveniste A., Delyon B., Glorennec P. Y., Hjalmarsson H. and Juditsky A. (1995): Nonlinear black-box modeling in system identification: A unified overview. - Automatica, Vol. 31, No. 12, pp. 1691-1724.
49. Sun R., Tsung F. and Qu L. (2004): Combining bootstrap and genetic programming for feature discovery in diesel engine diagnosis. - Int. J. Ind. Eng., Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 273-281.
50. Uciński D. (2005): Optimal Measurements Methods for Distributed Parameter System Identification. - Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
51. Walter E. and Pronzato L. (1997): Identification of Parametric Models from Experimental Data. - Berlin: Springer
52. Watton J. and Pham D.T. (1997): An artificial NN based approach to fault diagnosis and classification of fluid power systems. - J. Syst. Contr. Eng., Vol. 211, No. 4, pp. 307-317.
53. Weerasinghe M., Gomm J.B and Williams D. (1998): Neural networks for fault diagnosis of a nuclear fuel processing plant at different operating points. - Contr. Eng. Pract., Vol. 6, No. 2, pp. 281-289.
54. Witczak M., Obuchowicz A. and Korbicz J. (2002): Genetic programming based approaches to identification and fault diagnosis of non-linear dynamic systems. - Int. J. Contr., Vol. 75, No. 13, pp. 1012-1031.
55. Witczak M. (2003): Identification and Fault Detection of Nonlinear Dynamic Systems. - Zielona Góra: University of Zielona Góra Press.
56. Witczak M. and Korbicz J. (2004): Observers and genetic programming in the identification and fault diagnosis of non-linear dynamic systems, In: Fault Diagnosis. Models, Artificial Intelligence, Applications (Korbicz J., Kościelny J.M., Kowalczuk Z. and Cholewa W., Eds.). - Berlin: Springer.
57. Witczak M., Korbicz J., Mrugalski M. and Patton R.J. (2006): GMDH neural network-based approach to robust fault detection and its application to solve the DAMADICS benchmark problem. - Contr. Eng. Pract., Vol. 14, No. 6, pp. 671-683.
58. Witczak M. and Prȩtki P. (2005): Designing neural-network-based fault detection systems with D-optimum experimental conditions. - Comput. Assist. Mech. Engi. Sci., Vol. 12, No. 2, pp. 279-291.
59. Witczak M. (2006): Towards the training of feed-forward neural networks with the D-optimum input sequence. - IEEE Trans. Neural Netw., Vol. 17, No. 2, pp. 357-373.
60. White H. (1989): Learning in artificial neural networks: A statistical perspective. - Neural Comput., Vol. 4, No. 4, pp. 305-318.
61. Yen G.G. and Lin K. (2000): Wavelet packet feature extraction for vibration monitoring. - IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., Vol. 47, No. 3, pp. 650-667.
62. Zhang J., Ma J. and Yan Y. (2000): Assessing blockage of the sensing line in a differential-pressure flow sensor by using the wavelet transform of its output. - Meas. Sci. Technol., Vol. 11, No. 3, pp. 178-184.
63. Zhao J., Chen B. and Shen J. (1998): Multidimensional nonorthogonal wavelet-sigmoid basis function neural networkfor dynamic process fault diagnosis. - Comput. Chem. Eng., Vol. 23, pp. 83-92.
64. Zolghardi A., Henry D. and Monision M. (1996): Design of nonlinear observers for fault diagnosis. A case study. - Contr. Eng. Pract., Vol. 4, No. 11, pp. 1535-1544.