Large-scale concept-response databases for food and drink using conjoint analysis, segmentation, and databasing

Handbook of Food Science, Technology, and Engineering - 4 Volume Set

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 1147-1160

  Moskowitz, Howard R ^a   Beckley, Jacqueline ^b  

^a MOSKOWITZ JACOBS INC   (United States)

^b Understanding and Insight Group   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION SERVICES;

CHOKE POINTS; CONCEPT-RESPONSE; CONJOINT ANALYSIS; CONSUMER ATTITUDES; EMERGING TRENDS; PRODUCT DEVELOPERS;

COMMERCE;

EID: 33646733570     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (11)

1. GEP Box, J Hunter and LS Hunter. Statistics for Experimenters. New York: John Wiley. 1978.
2. P Cattin & DR Wittink. Commercial use of conjoint analysis: A survey. Journal of Marketing, 46: 44-53, 1982.
3. DR Wittink, P Cattin. Commercial use of conjoint analysis: An update. Journal of Marketing, 53: 91-96, 1989.
4. RD Luce, J Tukey. Conjoint analysis: A new form of fundamental measurement. Journal Of Mathematical Psychology 1: 1-36, 1964.
5. PE Green, V Srinivasan. A general approach to product design optimization via conjoint analysis. Journal of Marketing, 45, 17-37, 1978.
6. HR Moskowitz, DG Martin. How computer aided design and presentation of concepts speeds up the product development process. Proceedings Of The 46th ESOMAR Conference, Copenhagen, Denmark, 1993, pp 405-419.
7. HR Moskowitz, A Gofman, B Itty, R Katz, M Manchaiah, Z Ma. Rapid, inexpensive, actionable concept generation and optimization-the use and promise of self-authoring conjoint analysis for the foodservice industry. Food Service Technology. 1: 149-168, 2001.
8. S Sharma. Applied Multivariate Techniques, New York: John Wiley, 1996.
9. S Sharma. Systat, the system for statistics. Evanston: SPSS Corporation, 1997.
10. HR Moskowitz, JB German, IS Saguy. Unveiling health attitudes and creating good-for-you foods: The genomics metaphor and consumer innovative web-based technologies. CRC Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, In Press 2004.
11. MR Lautman, L Percy. Cognitive and affective responses in attribute-based versus end-benefit oriented advertising. In: Advances in Consumer Research, 11 (ed. T.C. Kinnear), Proceedings of the Association for Consumer Research, 1983, pp 11-17.