Comparative effectiveness of manipulation, mobilisation and the Activator instrument in treatment of non-specific neck pain: A systematic review

Chiropractic and Osteopathy

Volumn 14, Issue , 2006, Pages

  Gemmell, Hugh ^a   Miller, Peter ^a  

^a ANGLO EUROPEAN COLLEGE OF CHIROPRACTIC   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CINAHL; CLINICAL TRIAL; DATA BASE; DISABILITY; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; JOINT FUNCTION; JOINT MOBILIZATION; MEDLINE; META ANALYSIS; MUSCLE RELAXATION; NECK PAIN; ORTHOPEDIC EQUIPMENT; ORTHOPEDIC MANIPULATION; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PAIN THRESHOLD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY CONTROL; RATING SCALE; REVIEW; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VALIDATION PROCESS; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

EID: 33646731106     PISSN: 17461340     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1746-1340-14-7     Document Type: Review

References (33)

1. Jordan A, Bendix T, Nielsen H, Hansen FR, Host D, Winkel A: Intensive training, physiotherapy, or manipulation for patients with chronic neck pain. Spine 1998, 23:311-319.
2. Sarigiovannis P, Hollis B: Effectiveness of manual therapy in the treatment of non-specific neck pain: a review. Physical Therapy Review 2005, 10:35-50.
3. McGregor AH, Wragg P, Gedroyc WMW: Can interventional MRI provide an insight into the mechanics of a posterior-anterior mobilisation? Clinical Biomechanics 2001, 16:926-929.
4. Lee RYW, McGregor AH, Bull AMJ, Wragg P: Dynamic response of the cervical spine to posteroanterior mobilisation. Clinical Biomechanics 2005, 20:228-231.
5. Refshauge KM, Parry S, Shirley D, Larsen D, Rivett DA, Boland R: Professional responsibility in relation to cervical spine manipulation. Australian journal of Physiotherapy 2002, 48:171-179.
6. Sterling M, Jull G, Wright A: Cervical mobilisation: concurrent effects on pain, sympathetic nervous system activity and motor activity. Manual Therapy 2001, 6:72-81.
7. Jull G: Use of high and low velocity cervical manipulative therapy procedures by Australian manipulative physiotherapists. Australian Journal of Physiotherapy 2002, 48:189-193.
8. National Board of Chiropractic Examiners: Job Analysis of Chiropractic: A Project Report, Survey Analysis and Summary of the Practice of Chiropractic within the United States Greeley, Colorado, USA: National Board of Chiropractic Examiners; 1993.
9. National Board of Chiropractic Examiners: Job Analysis of Chiropractic: A Project Report, Survey Analysis and Summary of the Practice of Chiropractic within the United States Greeley, Colorado, USA: National Board of Chiropractic Examiners; 2000.
10. National Board of Chiropractic Examiners: Job Analysis of Chiropractic: A Project Report, Survey Analysis, and Summary of the Practice of Chiropractic within the United States Greeley, Colorado, USA: National Board of Chiropractic Examiners; 2005.
11. National Board of Chiropractic Examiners: Job Analysis of Chiropractic in Canada: A Project Report, Survey Analysis and Summary of the Practice of Chiropractic within Canada Greeley, Colorado, USA: National Board of Chiropractic Examiners, International Division; 1993.
12. National Board of Chiropractic Examiners: Job Analysis of Chiropractic in Australia and New Zealand: A Project Report, Survey Analysis, and Summary of the Practice of Chiropractic within Australia and New Zealand Greeley, Colorado, USA: National Board of Chiropractic Examiners, International Division; 1994.
13. Gross AR, Kay TM, Kennedy C, Gasner D, Hurley L, Yardley K, Hendry L, McLaughlin L: Clinical practice guideline on the use of manipulation and mobilization in the treatment of adults with mechanical neck disorders. Manual Therapy 2002, 7:193-205.
14. Hurwitz EL, Morgenstern H, Vassilaki M, Chiang L-M: Adverse reactions to chiropractic treatment and their effects on satisfaction and clinical outcomes among patients enrolled in the UCLA neck pain study. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2004, 27:16-25.
15. Hurwitz EL, Morgenstern H, Vassilaki M, Chiang L-M: Frequency and clinical predictors of adverse reactions to chiropractic care in the UCLA neck pain study. Spine 2005, 30:1477-1484.
16. Di Fabio RP: Manipulation of the cervical spine: risks and benefits. Phys Ther 1999, 79:50-65.
17. Gross AR, Hoving JL, Haines TA, Goldsmith CH, Kay T, Aker P, Bronfort G: A Cochrane review of manipulation and mobilization for mechanical neck disorders. Spine 2004, 29:1541-1548.
18. Hurwitz EL, Aker PD, Adams AH, Meeker WC, Shekelle PG: Manipulation and mobilization the cervical spine. A systematic review of the literature. Spine 1996, 21:1746-1760.
19. Koes BW, Assendelft WJJ, Van der Heijden GJMG, Bouter LM, Knipschild PG: Spinal manipulation and mobilisation for back and neck pain: a blinded review. BMJ 1991, 303:1298-1303.
20. Bronfort G, Haas M, Evans RL, Bouter LM: Efficacy of spinal manipulation and mobilization for low back pain and neck pain: a systematic review and best evidence synthesis. The Spine Journal 2004, 4:335-356.
21. Jadad AR, Moore RA, Carroll D, Jenkinson C, Reynolds JM, Gavaghan DJ, McQuy HJ: Assessing the quality of reports of randomised clinical trials: Is blinding necessary? Controlled Clin Trials 1996, 17:1-12.
22. Vernon HT, Aker P, Burns S, Viljakaanen S, Short L: Pressure pain threshold evaluation of the effect of spinal manipulation in the treatment of chronic neck pain: A pilot study. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1990, 13:13-16.
23. Cassidy JD, Lopes AA, Yong-Hing K: The immediate effect of manipulation versus mobilization on pain and range of motion in the cervical spine: A randomized controlled trial. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 1992, 15:570-575.
24. Yurkiw D, Mior S: Comparison of two chiropractic techniques on pain and lateral flexion in neck pain patients: a pilot study. Chiropractic Technique 1996, 8:155-162.
25. Wood TG, Colloca CJ, Mathews R: A pilot randomized clinical trial on the relative effect of instrumental (MFMA) versus manual (HVLA) manipulation in the treatment of cervical spine dysfunction. J Manipulative Physiol Ther 2001, 24:260-271.
26. Hurwitz EL, Morgenstern H, Harber P, Kominski GF, Yu F, Adams AH: A randomized trial of chiropractic manipulation and mobilization for patients with neck pain: Clinical outcomes from the UCLA neck-pain study. Am J Public Health 2002, 92:1634-1641.
27. Ernst E, Harkness E: Spinal manipulation: a systematic review of sham-controlled, double-blind, randomized clinical trials. J Pain Symptom Manage 2001, 22:879-889.
28. Downing DS, Weinstein A: Ultrasound therapy for subacromial bursitis. A double blind trial. Phys Ther 1986, 66:194-199.
29. Nykanen M: Pulsed ultrasound treatment of the painful shoulder. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Scan J Rehabil Med 1995, 27:105-108.
30. Van der Windt DAWM, Van der Heijden GJMG, Van den Berg SGM, Ter Riet G, De Winter AF, Bouter LM: Therapeutic ultrasound for acute ankle sprains. The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2002. Art. No.: CD001250. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001250.
31. Hashish I, Harvey W, Harris M: Anti-inflammatory effects of ultrasound therapy: evidence for a major placebo effect. Rheumatology 1986, 25:77-81.
32. Bogduk N: Spinal manipulation for neck pain does not work. The Journal of Pain 2003, 4:427-428.
33. Greenhalgh T, Peacock R: Effectiveness and efficiency of search methods in systematic reviews of complex evidence: audit of primarysources. BMJ 2005 [http://bmj.com/cgi/doi/10.1136/bmj.38636.593461.68].