Adjusting expectations after spinal cord injury across global settings: A commentary

Disability and Rehabilitation

Volumn 28, Issue 10, 2006, Pages 659-661

  Wee, Joy Y M ^a,b  

^a QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b Providence Continuing Care Centre   (Canada)

Author keywords

ICF; Measures; Spinal cord injury

Indexed keywords

COMPARATIVE STUDY; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; EXPECTATION; HEALTH PRACTITIONER; HUMAN; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; MEDICAL LITERATURE; NOTE; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCORING SYSTEM; SOCIOECONOMICS; SPINAL CORD INJURY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

CULTURAL CHARACTERISTICS; DISABILITY EVALUATION; GOALS; HUMANS; INTERNATIONAL COOPERATION; PATIENT CARE PLANNING; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS; SPINAL CORD INJURIES; WORLD HEALTH;

EID: 33646694754     PISSN: 09638288     EISSN: 14645165     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09638280500242556     Document Type: Note

References (14)

1. Staas, W and Formal, C and Gershkoff, A and Hirschwald, J and Schmidt, M and Schultz, A and Smith, J. (1993) Rehabilitation of the spinal cord-injured patient. In Rehabilitation medicine2nd ed. (pp. 898-899). Philadelphia PA: JB Lippincott. 1
2. Waters, R and Sie, I and Adkins, R and Yakura, J. (1996) Recovery following spinal cord injury American Rehabilitation, 22(4), pp. 13-19.
3. Consortium for Spinal Cord Medicine Clinical Practice Guidelines. (2002) Consumer Guide: Expected Outcomes. Paralyzed Veterans of America.
4. Biering-Sorenson, F and Hansen, R and Biering-Sorensen, J. (2004) Mobility aids and transport possibilities 10-45 years after spinal cord injury Spinal Cord, 42, pp. 699-706.
5. Mahoney, F and Barthel, D. (1965) Functional evaluation: The Barthel Index Maryland State Medical Journal, 14, pp. 61-65.
6. Hamilton, B and Laughlin, J and Fiedler, R and Granger, C. (1994) Interrater reliability of the 7-level functional independence measure (FIM) Scandinavian Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 26, pp. 115-119.
7. Wee, J and Schwarz, R. (2004) An international comparative study assessing impairment, activities, and participation in spinal cord injury rehabilitation - A pilot study Asia Pacific Disability Rehabilitation Journal, 15(2), pp. 43-53.
8. Lundgren-Nilsson and et al. (2005) Cross-cultural validity of functional independence measure items in stroke: A study using Rasch analysis Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 37, pp. 23-31.
9. Alander, D and Parker, J and Shannon, S. (1997) Intermediate-term outcome of cervical spinal cord-injured patients older than 50 years of age Spine, 22(11), pp. 1189-1192.
10. Liem, N and McColl, M and King, W and Smith, K. (2004) Aging with a spinal cord injury: Factors associated with the need for more help with activities of daily living Archives of Physical & Medical Rehabilitation, 85, pp. 1567-1577.
11. Noreau, L and Fougeyrollas, P and Boschen, K. (2002) Perceived influence of the environment on social participation among individuals with spinal cord injury Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation, 7(3), pp. 56-72.
12. World Health Organization. (2001) International classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). World Health Organization. Geneva: World Health Organization.
13. The Participation Scale version 3c. (2003) The Leprosy Mission Research Resource Centre. New Delhi: Letter.
14. Cieza, A and et al. (2002) Linking Health-status measurements to the international classification of functioning, disability and health Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 34, pp. 205-210.