Teaching linguistic politeness: A methodological proposal

IRAL - International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching

Volumn 41, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 1-22

  Bou Franch, Patricia ^a   Garcés Conejos, Pilar ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33646685065     PISSN: 0019042X     EISSN: 16134141     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/iral.2003.001     Document Type: Article

References (59)

1. Alcón Soler, Eva (2000). The role of conversational interaction in the development of a second language: Its application to English language teaching in the classroom. Australian Review of Applied Linguistics 16: 135–145.
2. Bachman, Lyle (1990). Habilidad lingüística comunicativa. In Competencia Comunicativa: Doc-umentos Básicos en la Enseñanza de Lenguas Extranjeras, Miquel Llobera, Dell Hymes, Nancy Hornberger, Michael Canale, Henry Widdowson, Joseph M. Cots, Lyle Bachman, and Bernard Spolsky (eds.), 105–128. Madrid: Edelsa.
3. Bhatia, Vijay K. (1993). Analyzing Genre. Language Use in Professional Settings. London: Longman.
4. Bialystok, Ellen (1993). Symbolic representation and attentional control in pragmatic competence. In Interlanguage Pragmatics, Gabriele Kasper and Soshana Blum-Kulka (eds.), 43–57. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
5. Blum-Kulka, Soshana and Hadass Sheffer (1993). The metapragmatic discourse of American-Israeli families at dinner. In Interlanguage Pragmatics, Gabriele Kasper and Soshana Blum-Kulka (eds.), 196–223. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6. Bou-Franch, Patricia (1998). On pragmatic transfer. Studies in English Language and Linguistics 10: 5–19.
7. Bou-Franch, Patricia (2001). Conversation in foreign language instruction. In Language Learning in the Foreign Language Classroom, Victoria Codina and Eva Alcón (eds.), 53–73. Castellón: Universitat Jaume I.
8. Bou-Franch, Patricia and Pilar Garcés-Conejos (1994). La presentación de la imagen en conversa-ciones entre hablantes nativas y no nativas de inglés. Pragmalingüística 2: 37–61.
9. Brown, Gillian and George Yule (1983). Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. Brown, Penelope and Stephen C. Levinson (1987). Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
11. Carter, Ronald and Michael McCarthy (1995). Grammar and the spoken language. Applied Linguistics 16: 141–158.
12. Celce-Murcia, Marianne, Zoltán Dörnyei, and Sarah Thurrell (1995). Communicative competence: A pedagogically motivated model with content specifications. Issues in Applied Linguistics 6: 5–35.
13. Christie, Frances (1999). Genre theory and ESL teaching: A systemic functional perspective. TESOL Quarterly 33: 759–763.
14. Dörnyei, Zoltán and Sarah Thurrell (1994). Teaching conversational skills intensively: Course content and rationale. ELT Journal 48: 40–49.
15. Escandell-Vidal, M. Victoria (1998). Politeness: A relevant issue for relevance theory. Revista Alicantina de Estudios Ingleses 11: 45–57.
16. Fraser, Bruce (1980). Conversational mitigation. Journal of Pragmatics 4: 341–350.
17. Fraser, Bruce (1990). Perspectives on politeness. Journal of Pragmatics 14: 219–236.
18. Fraser, Bruce and W. Nolen, (1981). The association of deference with linguistic form. International Journal of the Sociology of Language 27: 93–109.
19. Freedman, Aviva (1999). Beyond the text: Towards understanding the teaching and learning of genres. TESOL Quarterly 33: 764–767.
20. Freedman, Aviva and Peter Medway (1994). Locating genre studies: Antecedents and prospects. In Genre and the New Rhetoric, Aviva Freedman and Peter Medway (eds.), 1–20. London: Ta y l or and Francis.
21. Garcés-Conejos, Pilar (1991). La ira y la cortesía: Codificación lingüística del cambio social en el teatro inglés de los años 60. Ph.D. diss., Universitat de València.
22. Garcés-Conejos, Pilar (1993). Ejemplo práctico de pragmática literaria: Una propuesta metodológica multidisci-plinar. In XI Congreso Nacional de Lingüística Aplicada, José M. Ruiz, Patrick Serrín, and Elena Gonzáles (eds.), 301–310. Valladolid: Universidad de Valladolid.
23. Garcés-Conejos, Pilar (1995). Revisión crítica de algunos de los postulados de la teoría de la cortesía lingüística propugnada por Brown y Levinson. In Aspectes de la Reflexió i de la Praxi Interlingüística, Carlos Hernández, Brigitte Lépinette, and Manuel Pérez (eds.), 43–62. Valencia: Universitat de València.
24. Garcés-Conejos, Pilar (2001). The teaching of pragmatic aspects in the ESL/EFL classroom: A critical review. In Te aching English in a Spanish Setting, Hang Ferrer, Barry Pennock, Patricia Bou, Carmen Gregori, and Mar Martí (eds.), 79–94. Valencia: Universitat de València.
25. Garcés-Conejos, Pilar and Patricia Bou-Franch (to appear). A pragmatic account of listenership/ listeners: Implications for foreign language teaching.
26. Garcés-Conejos, Pilar, Patricia Bou-Franch, and Emilio García-Gómez (1992). Estudio pragmático-contrastivo del diminutivo: Una propuesta metodológica. In Bilingüismo y Adquisición de Lenguas: Actas del IX Congreso Nacional de AESLA, Feli Etxeberria and Jesús Arzamendi (eds.), 247–257. Bilbao: Universidad del País Vasco.
27. Garcés-Conejos, Pilar and Antonia Sánchez-Macarro (1998). Scientific discourse as interaction: Scientific articles vs. popularizations. In Linguistic Choice across Genres, Antonia Sánchez and Ronald Carter (eds.), 173–190. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
28. Garcés-Conejos, Pilar and M. Mar Torreblanca-López (1997). Estrategias de énfasis y mitigación en el discurso del profesor de inglés como L2. In Gramática y Pragmática, M. Martínez-Vázquez (ed.), 1–13. Huelva: G.I. de gramática contrastiva.
29. Gómez-Morón, Reyes (1998). Aproximación pragmática al estudio del género: La utilización de estrategias de cortesía en los artículos médicos y lingüísticos. Ph.D. diss., Universidad de Sevilla.
30. Gómez-Morón, Reyes (2001). La enseñanza del uso de la cita en el artículo de investigación: Una aproximación pragmática. In Te aching English in a Spanish Setting, Hang Ferrer, Barry Pennock, Patricia Bou, Carmen Gregori, and Mar Martí (eds.), 111–122. Valencia: Universitat de València.
31. Gregori-Signes, Carmen (2000). The tabloid talkshow as a quasi-conversational type of face-to-face interaction. Pragmatics 10: 195–213.
32. Grice, Paul (1975). Logic and conversation. In Syntax and Semantics, vol. 3, Speech Acts, P. Cole and J. Morgan (eds.), 41–50. New York: Academic Press.
33. Jary, Mark (1998). Relevance theory and the communication of politeness. Journal of Pragmatics 30: 1–19.
34. Kasper, Gabriele (1992). Pragmatic transfer. Second Language Research 8: 203–231.
35. Kasper, Gabriele (1997). Can Pragmatic Competence be Taught? (NetWork no.6). URL: http://www.lll.hawaii. edu/nflrc/networks/nw6. [Retrieved 11 June 2000]. Honolulu: Second Language Teaching Curriculum Center, University of Hawaii.
36. Kerbrat-Orecchioni, Catherine (1997). A multilevel approach in the study of talk-in-interaction. Pragmatics 7: 1–20.
37. Lakoff, Robyn T. (1973). The logic of politeness; or, minding your p's and q's. In Proceedings of the Ninth Regional Meeting of the Chicago Linguistic Society, Claudia Corum, Cedric Smith-Stark, and Ann Weiser (eds.), 292–305. Chicago: Chicago Linguistic Society.
38. Lakoff, Robyn T. (1989). The limits of politeness: Therapeutic and courtroom discourse. Multilingua 8: 101- 129.
39. Leech, Geoffrey N. (1983). Principles of Pragmatics. London: Longman.
40. Lorenzo-Dus, Nuria (2001). Applying cross-cultural speech act research to the EFL classroom: The teaching of compliment responses. In Te aching English in a Spanish Setting, Hang Ferrer, Barry Pennock, Patricia Bou, Carmen Gregori, and Mar Martí (eds.), 159–170. Valencia: Universitat de València.
41. Martin, James R. (1985). Process and text: Two aspects of human semiosis. In Systemic Perspectives on Discourse, James D. Benson and William S. Greaves (eds.), 248–274. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
42. McCann, C. Douglas and E. Tony Higgins (1990). Social cognition and communication. In Handbook of Language and Social Psychology, Howard Giles and W. Peter Robinson (eds.), 13–32. Chichester: John Wiley and Sons.
43. McCarthy, Michael and Ronald Carter (1994). Language as Discourse: Perspectives for Language Te a ching. London: Longman.
44. Meier, Ardith J. (1997). Teaching the universals of politeness. ELT Journal 51: 21–28.
45. Miller, Carolyn R. (1984). Genre as social action. Quarterly Journal of Speech 70: 151–167.
46. Richards, Jack C. (1990). The Language Teaching Matrix. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
47. Richards, Jack C. and Richard Schmidt (eds.) (1983). Language and Communication. London: Longman.
48. Sacks, Harvey, Emanuel A. Schegloff, and Gail Jefferson (1974). A simplest systematics for the organization of turn-taking for conversation. Language 50: 696–735.
49. Schegloff, Emmanuel A. (1999). Discourse, pragmatics, conversation, analysis. Discourse Studies 1: 405–435.
50. Schmidt, Richard (1993). Consciousness, learning and interlanguage pragmatics. In Interlanguage Pragmatics, Gabriele Kasper and Soshana Blum-Kulka (eds.), 21–42. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
51. Scollon, Ron and Suzanne W. Scollon (1995). Intercultural Communication: A Discourse Approach. Oxford: Blackwell.
52. Spencer-Oatey, Hellen (ed.) (2000). Culturally Speaking: Managing Rapport through Talk across Cultures. London: Continuum.
53. Sperber, Dan and Deirdre Wilson (1986). Relevance. London: Blackwell.
54. Sperber, Dan and Deirdre Wilson (1995). Relevance. 2nd ed. London: Blackwell.
55. Swales, John (1990). Genre Analysis. English in Academic and Research Settings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
56. Thomas, Jenny (1983). Cross-cultural pragmatic failure. Applied Linguistics 4: 91–112.
57. Thomas, Jenny (1995). Meaning in Interaction: An Introduction to Pragmatics. London: Longman.
58. Torreblanca-López, M. Mar and Pilar Garcés-Conejos (1996). La clase de inglés como L2: Dis-curso interactivo o informativo? Una aproximación desde la teoría de la cortesía Lingüística. Babel-AFIAL 3–4–5: 123–143.
59. Wilson, Deirdre (2000). Metarepresentation. Course delivered in Vitoria, Universidad del País Va s c o.