Coinciding objects: Reply to Lowe and Denkel

Analysis

Volumn 57, Issue 1, 1997, Pages 11-18

  Burke, Michael B ^a  

^a INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33646677383     PISSN: 00032638     EISSN: 14678284     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/analys/57.1.11     Document Type: Note

References (12)

1. Baxter, D. L. M. 1988. Many-one identity. Philosophical Papers 17: 193-216.
2. Burke, M. B. 1980. Cohabitation, stuff and intermittent existence. Mind 89: 391-405.
3. Burke, M. B. 1992. Copper statues and pieces of copper: a challenge to the standard account. Analysis 52: 12-17.
4. Burke, M. B. 1994a. Dion and Theon: an essentialist solution to an ancient puzzle. The Journal of Philosophy 91: 129-39.
5. Burke, M. B. 1994b. Preserving the principle of one object to a place: a novel account of the relations among objects, sorts, sortals, and persistence conditions. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 54: 591-624.
6. Denkel, A. 1995. Theon's tale: does a Cambridge change result in a substantial change? Analysis 55: 166-70.
7. Laycock, H. 1972. Some questions of ontology. The Philosophical Review 81: 3-42.
8. Lowe, E. J. 1989. Kinds of Being: A Study of Individuation, Identity and the Logic of Sortal Terms. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
9. Lowe, E. J. 1995. Coinciding objects: in defence of the 'standard account'. Analysis 55: 171-78.
10. Simons, P. 1987. Parts: A Study in Ontology. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
11. Wiggins, D. 1980. Sameness and Substance. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
12. Zimmerman, D. W 1995. Theories of masses and problems of constitution. The Philosophical Review 104: 53-110.