|
|
|
Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 519-558
|
|
The politics of pain: rhetoric or reform?
|
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
|
Indexed keywords
ANALGESIC AGENT;
ACCREDITATION;
ARTICLE;
GOVERNMENT;
HEALTH CARE AND PUBLIC HEALTH;
HEALTH CARE QUALITY;
HUMAN;
LEGAL APPROACH;
LEGAL ASPECT;
MEDICOLEGAL ASPECT;
PAIN;
PALLIATIVE THERAPY;
POLICY;
PRACTICE GUIDELINE;
STANDARD;
STUDY TO UNDERSTAND PROGNOSES AND PREFERENCES FOR OUTCOMES AND RISKS OF TREATMENTS (SUPPORT);
UNITED STATES;
HEALTH CARE AND PUBLIC HEALTH;
LEGAL APPROACH;
STUDY TO UNDERSTAND PROGNOSES AND PREFERENCES FOR OUTCOMES AND RISKS OF TREATMENTS (SUPPORT);
ANALGESICS;
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT;
HUMANS;
JOINT COMMISSION ON ACCREDITATION OF HEALTHCARE ORGANIZATIONS;
LEGISLATION, MEDICAL;
PAIN;
PALLIATIVE CARE;
PRACTICE GUIDELINES;
PUBLIC POLICY;
QUALITY OF HEALTH CARE;
STATE GOVERNMENT;
UNITED STATES;
|
|
EID: 33646675573
PISSN: 15518426
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Article |
|
Times cited : (5)
|
|
References (0)
|
