Differential cortical processing of location and pitch changes in dichotic pitch

NeuroReport

Volumn 17, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 389-393

  Johnson, Blake W ^a   Hautus, Michael J ^a   Hayns, Alexandra L ^a   Fitzgibbon, Bernadette M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Auditory cortex; Dichotic pitch; Event related potential; Interaural time difference; Mismatch negativity; Pitch perception; Sound localization

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY CORTEX; AUDITORY STIMULATION; AUDITORY SYSTEM; BRAIN CORTEX; DIRECTIONAL HEARING; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; FEMALE; HEARING; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; NORMAL HUMAN; PITCH; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PSYCHOPHYSICS; SOUND DETECTION; ASSOCIATION; ATTENTION; AUDITORY NERVOUS SYSTEM; DEPTH PERCEPTION; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED RESPONSE; HEMISPHERIC DOMINANCE; ORIENTATION; PHYSIOLOGY;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; ATTENTION; AUDITORY CORTEX; AUDITORY PATHWAYS; CUES; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; MALE; ORIENTATION; PITCH PERCEPTION; SOUND LOCALIZATION; SPACE PERCEPTION;

EID: 33646671704     PISSN: 09594965     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.wnr.0000203358.72814.df     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Rauschecker JP, Tian B. Mechanisms and streams for processing of 'what' and 'where' in auditory cortex. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2000; 97:11800-11806.
2. Clarke S, Bellmann A, Meuli RA, Assal G, Steck AJ. Auditory agnosia and auditory spatial deficits following left hemispheric lesions: evidence for distinct processing pathways. Neuropsychologia 2000; 38:797-807.
3. Hart HC, Palmer AR, Hall DA. Different areas of human non-primary auditory cortex are activated by sounds with spatial and nonspatial properties. Hum Brain Mapp 2004; 21:178-190.
4. Alain C, Arnott SR, Hevenor S, Graham S, Grady CL. 'What' and 'where' in the human auditory system. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001; 98:12301-12306.
5. Anourova I, Nikouline VV, Ilmoniemi RJ, Hotta J, Aronen HJ, Carlson S. Evidence for dissociation of spatial and nonspatial auditory information processing. Neuroimage 2001; 14:1268-1277.
6. Middlebrooks JC. Auditory space processing: here, there or everywhere? Nat Neurosci 2002; 5:824-826.
7. Zatorre RJ, Bouffard M, Ahad P, Belin P. Where is 'where' in the human auditory cortex? Nat Neurosci 2002; 5:905-909.
8. Ungan P, Yagcioglu S, Goksoy C. Differences between the N1 waves of the responses to interaural time and intensity disparities: scalp topography and dipole sources. Clin Neurophysiol 2001; 112:485-498.
9. Dougherty RF, Cynader MS, Bjornson BH, Edgell D, Giaschi DE. Dichotic pitch: a new stimulus distinguishes normal and dyslexic auditory function. Neuroreport 1998; 9:3001-3005.
10. Johnson BW, Hautus M, Clapp WC. Neural activity associated with binaural processes for the perceptual segregation of pitch. Clin Neurophysiol 2003; 114:2245-2250.
11. Hautus MJ, Johnson BW. Object-related brain potentials associated with the perceptual segregation of a dichotically embedded pitch. J Acoust Soc Am 2005; 117:275-280.
12. Alain C, Schuler BM, McDonald KL. Neural activity associated with distinguishing concurrent auditory objects. J Acoust Soc Am 2002; 111:990-995.
13. Picton TW, Alain C, Otten L, Ritter W, Achim A. Mismatch negativity: different water in the same river. Audiol Neurootol 2000; 5:111-139.
14. Paavilainen P, Karlsson ML, Reinikainen K, Naatanen R. Mismatch negativity to change in spatial location of an auditory stimulus. Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol 1989; 73:129-141.
15. Nager W, Kohlmetz C, Joppich G, Mobes J, Munte TF. Tracking of multiple sound sources defined by interaural time differences: brain potential evidence in humans. Neurosci Lett 2003; 344:181-184.
16. Naatanen R, Winkler I. The concept of auditory stimulus representation in cognitive neuroscience. Psychol Bull 1999; 125:826-859.
17. Jacobsen T, Schroger E, Horenkamp T, Winkler I. Mismatch negativity to pitch change: varied stimulus proportions in controlling effects of neural refractoriness on human auditory event-related brain potentials. Neurosci Lett 2003; 344:79-82.
18. Deouell LY, Bentin S. Variable cerebral responses to equally distinct deviance in four auditory dimensions: a mismatch negativity study. Psychophysiology 1998; 35:745-754.
19. Schroger E, Wolff C. Fast preattentive processing of location: a functional basis for selective listening in humans. Neurosci Lett 1997; 232:5-8.
20. Tiitinen H, May P, Reinikainen K, Naatanen R. Attentive novelty detection in humans is governed by pre-attentive sensory memory. Nature 1994; 372:90-92.
21. Sussman E, Ritter W, Vaughan HG Jr. Attention affects the organization of auditory input associated with the mismatch negativity system. Brain Res 1998; 789:130-138.
22. Koelsch S, Schroger E, Tervaniemi M. Superior pre-attentive auditory processing in musicians. Neuroreport 1999; 10:1309-1313.
23. Sussman ES, Gumenyuk V. Organization of sequential sounds in auditory memory. Neuroreport 2005; 16:1519-1523.
24. Zachau S, Rinker T, Korner B, Kohls G, Maas V, Hennighausen K, Schecker M. Extracting rules: early and late mismatch negativity to tone patterns. Neuroreport 2005; 16:2015-2019.
25. Sittiprapaporn WCA, Tervaniemi M, Chindaduangratn C, Kotchabhakdi N. Preattentive discrimination of across-category and within-category change in consonant-vowel syllable. Neuroreport 2005; 16:1513-1518.