THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN INTENSITY AND SUBGLOTTAL PRESSURE WITH CONTROLLED PITCH

5th International Conference on Spoken Language Processing, ICSLP 1998

Volumn , Issue , 1998, Pages

  Lecuit, Véronique ^a   Demolin, Didier ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LIBRE DE BRUXELLES   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTINUOUS SPEECH RECOGNITION;

MODELING DESIGNS; PRODUCTION MODELS; SPEECH PRODUCTION; SPEECH SIGNALS; SUBGLOTTAL PRESSURE;

LINGUISTICS;

EID: 33646650427     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (8)

1. Holmberg E.B., R.E. Hillman, J.S. Perkell. (1988), ÒGlottal airflow and transglottal air pressure measurements for male and female speakers in soft, normal, and loud voiceÓ, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., Vol. 84, 2, pp. 511-529.
2. Isshiki N. (1964) ÒRegulatory mechanism of voice intensity variationÓ, J. Speech Hearing Res., Vol. 7, pp. 17-29.Lyon, R.F., and Mead, C. ÇAn Analog Electronic Cochlea,È IEEE Trans. ASSP 36: 1119Ð 1134, 1988.
3. Ladefoged P. and N.P. McKinney. (1963) ÒLoudness, Sound Pressure, and Subglottal Pressure in SpeechÓ, J. Acoust. Soc. Am., Vol 35, 4. pp. 454-460.
4. Lecuit V. and D. Demolin. (1998). ÒRelation entre pression sous glottique et intensitŽ: Žtude des voyelles du fran•aisÓ, Actes des XXI•mes J.E.P., Martigny, Suisse 1998.
5. Mc Allister A. and J. Sundberg. (1996), ÒData on subglottal pressure and SPL at varied vocal loudness and pitch in 8 to 11-year-old childrenÓ, TMH-QPSR, Vol. 4, pp. 27-35.
6. Strik H. et L. Boves. (1992), ÒControl of fundamental frequency, intensity, and voice quality in speechÓ, Journal of Phonetics, Vol. 20, pp. 15-25.
7. Teston B. (1983), ÒUn systeme de mesure des param•tres aŽrodynamiques de la parole: le polyphonom•tre mod•le IIIÓ, Travaux de LÕInstitut de PhonŽtique dÕAix. Vol. 9, pp. 373-383.
8. Titze I.R. (1994) Principles of Voice Production, Prentice Hall.