SCOPUS 정보 검색 플랫폼

Volumn 88, Issue 8, 1988, Pages 5076-5085

On the ionization potential of small metal and dielectric particles

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33646626990 PISSN: 00219606 EISSN: None Source Type: Journal
DOI: 10.1063/1.454661 Document Type: Article

Times cited : (145)

References (31)

10
- 84950537456
- Interestingly, Schumacher and co-workers used Eq. (1b) in their earlier paper [Ref. 1(a)], however they later [Ref. 1(b)] replaced it by Eq. (la), realizing that it is the correct mathematical limit.

12
- 0007227879
- (a)
- (1970) Phys. Rev. B , vol.2 , pp. 2955
- Beck, D.E.¹ Celli, V.²

13
- 4243640809
- (b) Phys. Rev. B
- (1970) Phys. Rev. B , vol.1 , pp. 3304
- Newns, D.M.¹

15
- 0001503532
- Phys. Rev. B
- (1972) Phys. Rev. B , vol.6 , pp. 1122
- Applebaum, J.A.¹ Hamann, D.R.²

16
- 85034868744
- Note that in this case [formula omitted] and all the contribution to Eq. (36) arises from [formula omitted]

18
- 0345809961
- (1982) J. Chem. Phys. , vol.76 , pp. 3177
- Das, P.C.¹ Gersten, J.I.²

20
- 10644250257
- (a)
- (1964) Phys. Rev. B , vol.136 , pp. 864
- Hohenberg, P.¹ Kohn, W.²

21
- 0042113153
- (b)
- (1965) Phys. Rev. A , vol.140 , pp. 1133
- Kohn, W.¹ Sham, L.²

23
- 0021386506
- (a)
- (1984) Ber. Bunsenges. Phys. Chem. , vol.88 , pp. 289
- Ekardt, W.¹

31
- 85034872027
- Reference 6(a), Sec. B. The final size dependent result, Eq. (9) of this reference, is a positive correction to the bulk ionization potential. However, in the discussion following, the sign convention for ionization potential is used incorrectly. Thus, the result, Eq. (9), is an increase and not a decrease in the bulk ionization potential. In the case of electron capture yielding a negatively charged sphere with an electron delocalized at the conduction band bottom, Eq. (9) is a decrease in the electron affinity, as stated in the discussion.

* 이 정보는 Elsevier사의 SCOPUS DB에서 KISTI가 분석하여 추출한 것입니다.