Cyclic spin exchange in cuprate spin ladders

Physical Review B - Condensed Matter and Materials Physics

Volumn 66, Issue 18, 2002, Pages 1804041-1804044

  Nunner, Tamara S ^a   Brune, Philipp ^a   Kopp, Thilo ^a   Windt, Marco ^b   Grüninger, Markus ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AUGSBURG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COLOGNE   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONDUCTANCE; DENSITY; DISPERSION; EXCITATION; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; MOLECULAR MECHANICS; TRANSPORT KINETICS;

EID: 33646624016     PISSN: 01631829     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. R. Coldea et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 5377 (2001).
2. A.A. Katanin and A.P. Kampf, Phys. Rev. B 66, 100403 (2002).
3. A.H. MacDonald, S.M. Girvin, and D. Yoshioka, Phys. Rev. B 37, 9753 (1988); 41, 2565 (1990).
4. A.H. MacDonald, S.M. Girvin, and D. Yoshioka, Phys. Rev. B 37, 9753 (1988); 41, 2565 (1990).
5. E. Müller-Hartmann and A. Reischl, Eur. Phys. J. B 28, 173 (2002).
6. H.J. Schmidt and Y. Kuramoto, Physica C 167, 263 (1990).
7. V. Kataev et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 2882 (2001).
8. S. Brehmer et al., Phys. Rev. B 60, 329 (1999).
9. M. Matsuda et al., Phys. Rev. B 62, 8903 (2000); J. Appl. Phys. 87, 6271 (2000).
10. M. Matsuda et al., Phys. Rev. B 62, 8903 (2000); J. Appl. Phys. 87, 6271 (2000).
11. D.C. Johnston et al., cond-mat/0001147 (unpublished).
12. M. Windt et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 127002 (2001).
13. M. Grüninger et al., J. Phys. Chem. Solids 63, 2335 (2002).
14. A.A. Nersesyan and A.M. Tsvelik, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78, 3939 (1997).
15. J. Lorenzana, J. Eroles, and S. Sorella, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83, 5122 (1999).
16. J. Lorenzana and G.A. Sawatzky, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 1867 (1995); Phys. Rev. B 52, 9576 (1995).
17. J. Lorenzana and G.A. Sawatzky, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 1867 (1995); Phys. Rev. B 52, 9576 (1995).
18. C. Jurecka and W. Brenig, Phys. Rev. B 61, 14 307 (2000).
19. T.D. Kühner and S.R. White, Phys. Rev. B 60, 335 (1999).
20. M. Uehara et al., J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 65, 2764 (1996).
21. E. Dagotto and T.M. Rice, Science 271, 618 (1996).
22. S. Sachdev and R.N. Bhatt, Phys. Rev. B 41, 9323 (1990); S. Gopalan, T.M. Rice, and M. Sigrist, ibid. 49, 8901 (1994).
23. S. Sachdev and R.N. Bhatt, Phys. Rev. B 41, 9323 (1990); S. Gopalan, T.M. Rice, and M. Sigrist, ibid. 49, 8901 (1994).
24. α = 1.
25. K.A. Hallberg, Phys. Rev. B 52, R9827 (1995).
26. All Lanczos-vector calculations were performed with three to five iterations of the finite-lattice algorithm and a maximum of 200-300 states. Four Lanczos vectors were used as target states. All calculations were performed with open boundary conditions. A Parzen filter was used to minimize edge effects for the calculation of correlation functions.
27. For all finite-size extrapolations a polynomial in 1/N was used, where the 1/N term was excluded. This is the correct finite-size scaling for the S=1 chain (Ref. 24).
28. E.S. Sørensen and I. Affleck, Phys. Rev. Lett. 71, 1633 (1993).
29. Y. Honda and T. Horiguchi, cond-mat/0106426 (unpublished).
30. leg measurements on a thin sample (d≈μm) allowed for a considerable improvement of the background determination with respect to Refs. 10 and 11. Details will be published elsewhere.
31. T.S. Nunner et al., in Proceedings of SCES 2002 [Acta Phys. Pol. B (to be published)].
32. Here Ramasesha's algorithm (Ref. 29) has been used instead of the conjugate gradient method.
33. S. Ramasesha, J. Comput. Chem. 11, 545 (1990).
34. leg(ω), thus two different phonon frequencies are used in Fig. 3.
35. T. S. Nunner, P. Brune, and T. Kopp (unpublished).