Vertical integration in the community forestry enterprises of Oaxaca

The Community Forests of Mexico: Managing for Sustainable Landscapes

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 241-272

  Antinori, Camille ^a  

^a LAWRENCE BERKELEY NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33646597629     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (59)

1. Adelman, I., and C. T. Morris. 1967. Society, Politics and Economic Development: A Quantitative Approach. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.
2. Agarwal, B. 2001. Participatory exclusions, community forestry, and gender: An analysis for south Asia and a conceptual framework. World Development 29(10): 1623-1648.
3. Agrawal, A. 2002. Common resources and institutional sustainability. In Drama of the Commons, ed. E. Ostrom et al., 41-85. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
4. Antinori, C. 2000. Vertical integration in Mexican common property forests. PhD diss., University of California, Berkeley.
5. Bray, D., and M. Wexler. 1996. Forest policies in Mexico. In Changing Structure in Mexico: Political, Social and Economic Prospects, ed. L. Randall. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharpe.
6. Bromley, D., et al 1992. Making the Commons Work: Theory, Practice and Policy. San Francisco: Institute for Contemporary Studies Press.
7. Cancian, F 1992. Decline of Community in Zinacantan: Economy, Public Life, and Social Stratification, 1960-1987. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
8. Carlsen, L. 1999. Autonomíaindígenayusosycostumbres. In Chiapas no. 7, 45-70. Mexico City: Editorial Era.
9. Chapela, G. 1996. La organización de los campesinos forestales en México. In Antropología política: Enfoques contemporáneos, ed. H. Tejera Gaona, 545-559. Mexico City: Plaza y Valdés.
10. Coase, D. 1937. The nature of the firm. Económica 4:386-405.
11. Cohen, J. H. 1999. Cooperation and Community: Economy and Society in Oaxaca. Austin: University of Texas Press.
12. de la Peña, M. 1950. Problemas sociales y económicos de las mixtecas. Memorias delInstituto NacionalIndigenista 2(1).
13. Demsetz, H. 1967. Toward a theory of property rights. American Economic Review 57:347-358.
14. Diario Oficial de la Federación de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos. 23 October 1956.
15. Duane, T 1997. Community participation in ecosystem management. Ecology Law Quarterly 24(4): 771-798.
16. Globerman, S., and R. Schwindt. 1986. The organization of vertically related transactions in the Canadian forest products industries. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 7:199-212.
17. Goldberg, V. 1979. The law and economics of vertical restrictions: A relational perspective. Texas Law Review 58:91-129.
18. Grossman, S., and O. Hart. 1986. The costs and benefits of ownership: A theory of vertical and lateral integration. Journal of Political Economy 94(4):691-719.
19. Hardin, G. 1968. The tragedy of the commons. Science 162:1243-1248.
20. Hart, O. 1995. Firms, Contracts and Financial Structure. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
21. Hoddinott, J., M. Adato, T Besley, and L. Haddad, 2001. Participation and poverty reduction: Issues, theory and new evidence from South Africa. Discussion paper no. 98. Washington, DC: Food Consumption and Nutrition Division, International Food Policy Research Institute.
22. IBRD. 1995. Mexico-resource conservation and forest sector review. Report no. 13114-ME, March 31. Washington, DC: IBRD.
23. Jodha, N. 1992. Common property resources: A missing dimension of development strategies. World Bank Discussion paper no. 168. Washington, DC: IBRD.
24. Joskow, P. A. 1985. Vertical integration and long-term contracts: The case of coal-burning electric generating plants. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization 1(1): 33-80.
25. Kearney, M. 1972. The Winds of Ixtepeji: World View and Society in a Zapotec Town. New York: Holt, Reinhart and Winston.
26. Klein, P., and H. Shelanski. 1994. Empirical research in transaction cost economics: A survey and assessment. Working paper BPP-60. Berkeley: Center for Research in Management Business and Public Policy.
27. Klooster, D. 2000. Institutional choice, community, and struggle: A case study of forest co-management in Mexico. World Development 28(1): 1-20.
28. -. 2002. Towards adaptive community forestry management: Integrating local forest knowledge with scientific forestry. Economic Geography 78(1):43-70.
29. Kusel, J., and L. Fortmann. 1991. Well-Being and Forest Dependent Communities. Sacramento: California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, Forest and Rangelands Resource Assessment Program.
30. Leffler, K. B., and R. Rucker. 1991. Transaction costs and the efficient organization of production: A study of timber-harvesting contracts. Journal of Political Economy 99(5):1060-1087.
31. Ley Forestal. 1960. Diario Oficial de la Federación de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos, 16 January.
32. -. 1986. Diario Oficial de la Federación de los Estados Unidos Mexicanos, 30 May.
33. López-Arzola, R., and P. F. Gerez. 1993. The permanent tension. Cultural Survival Quarterly 17(1):42-44.
34. Maddala, G. S. 1983. Limited-Dependent and Qualitative Variables in Econometrics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
35. Mayers, J., and S. Vermeulen. 2002. Company-Community Forestry Partnership: From Raw Deals to Mutual Gains. London: International Institute of Environment and Development.
36. Meinzen-Dick, R., A. Knox, and M. di Gregoria. 2001. Collective action, property rights and devolution of natural resource management: Exchange of knowledge and implications for policy. Proceedings of the ICLARM/CAPRi International Conference, Feldafing, Germany, 2001.
37. Merino-Pérez, L., and G. Alatorre. 1997. Los impactos del conflicto social en el manejo de los recursos naturales. In El manejo forestal comunitario en México y sus perspectivas de sustentabilidad, ed. L. Merino-Pérez, G. Alatorre, B. Cabarle, F. Chapela, and S. Madrid, 57-74. Cuernavaca: UNAM, SEMARNAP, CCMSS, WRI.
38. Montes, F. D. 2002. Las controversias electorales en usos y costumbres. In Memoria dejusticia electoral en usos y costumbres: Reflexiones sobre legislación electoral en municipios indígenas, ed. Comisión Diocesana de Pastoral Social de Oaxaca and Servicios para una Educación Alternativa, Oaxaca.
39. Moros, F. A., and C. S. Solano. 1995. Forestry communities in Oaxaca: The struggle for free market access. In Case Studies of Community-Based Forestry Enterprises in the Americas, ed. N. Forster, 99-119. Madison: University of Wisconsin.
40. Munn, I., and R. Rucker. 1995. An economic analysis of the difference between bid prices on forest service and private timber sales. Forest Science 41(4): 823-840.
41. Nader, L. 1990. Harmony Ideology: Justice and Control in a Zapotec Mountain Village. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
42. Olson, M. L. 1964. The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
43. Ostrom, E. 1990. Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
44. Pego, M. A. Sanchez. 1995. The forest enterprise of the indigenous community of Nuevo San Juan Parangaricutiro, Michoacan, Mexico. In Case Studies of Community-Based Forestry Enterprises in the Americas, ed. N. Forster, 137-160. Madison: University of Wisconsin.
45. Peluso, N. 1996. Fruit trees and family trees in an anthropogenic forest: Ethics of access, property zones and environmental change in Indonesia. Comparative Studies in Society and History 38:510-548.
46. Putnam, R. 1995. Bowling alone: America's declining social capital. Journal of Democracy 6(1): 65-78.
47. SARH. 1994. Inventario forestalperiódico as quoted in Los aprovechamientos forestales en Oaxaca, subdelegación de recursos naturales, ed. SEMARNAP. Mexico City: SEMARNAP.
48. Scherr, S., A. White, and D, Kaimowitz. 2002. Making Markets Work for Forest Communities. Washington, DC: Forest Trends.
49. SEMARNAP. 2000. Conservación y manejo comunitario de los recursos forestales en Oaxaca. Oaxaca: Delegación Oaxaca.
50. Servicios para una Educación Alternativa (Educa A.C.) and Comisión Diocesana de Pastoral Social de Oaxaca. 2001. La elección en municipios de usosy costumbres. Durham: University of New Hampshire.
51. Sikor, T. 2002. The commons in transition: Sustainable agriculture in central and eastern European countries. Discussion paper no. 10. Division of Resource Economics. Berlin: Humboldt University.
52. Snook, L. K. 1986. Community forestry in Mexico's natural forests: The case of San Pablo Macuiltianguis. In Current Topics in Forest Research: Emphasis on Contributions by Women Scientists. Symposium proceedings, 4-6 November, report no. SE-46. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southeastern Forest Experiment Station.
53. Spores, R. 1984. The Mixtecs in Ancient and Colonial Times. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press.
54. Stephen, L. 1997. Redefined nationalism in building a movement for indigenous autonomy in southern Mexico. Journal of Latin American Anthropology 3(1): 72-101.
55. UBC. 2002. Proceedings of the International Conference on Global Perspectives on Indigenous People's Forestry: Linking Communities, Commerce and Conservation. 4-6 June, Vancouver, Canada.
56. Velásquez, M. C. 2000. El nombramiento: Las elecciones por usos y costumbres en Oaxaca. Oaxaca: Instituto Estatal Electoral.
57. White, A., and A. Martin. 2002. Who Owns the World's Forests: Forest Tenure and Public Forests in Transition. Washington, DC: Forest Trends.
58. Williamson, O. 1985. The Economic Institutions of Capitalism. New York: Free Press.
59. -. 1991. Comparative economic organization: The analysis of discrete structural alternatives. Administrative Science Quarterly 36(2):269-296.