A model for quantifying and predicting urban pressure on woodland

Landscape and Urban Planning

Volumn 77, Issue 1-2, 2006, Pages 17-27

  Ode, Åsa ^a   Fry, Gary ^b  

^a SWEDISH UNIVERSITY OF AGRICULTURAL SCIENCES   (Sweden)

^b NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES   (Norway)

Author keywords

Accessibility; Distance; GIS; Quality; Recreation; Urban forestry; Woodland

Indexed keywords

GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; IMAGE QUALITY; MANAGEMENT SCIENCE; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; URBAN PLANNING;

ACCESSIBILITY; DISTANCE; RECREATION; URBAN FORESTRY; WOODLANDS;

FORESTRY;

GIS; LANDSCAPE; POPULATION ECOLOGY; RECREATIONAL FACILITY; URBAN AREA; WOODLAND;

CITIES; FORESTRY; GIS; IMAGE QUALITY; MODELS;

EURASIA; EUROPE; NORTHERN EUROPE; SCANDINAVIA; SWEDEN;

EID: 33646595616     PISSN: 01692046     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2005.01.003     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Antrop M., and Van Eetvelde V. Holistic aspects of suburban landscapes: visual image interpretation and landscape metrics. Landscape Urban Plan. 50 (2000) 43-58
2. Brainard J., Bateman I., and Lovett A. Modelling demand for recreation in English woodlands. Forestry 74 (2001) 423-438
3. Bussey S.C., and Coles R.W. The structure and community use of an urban forest. Quart. J. For. 89 (1997) 182-191
4. Coles R.W., and Bussey S.C. Urban forest landscapes in the UK-progressing the social agenda. Landscape Urban Plan. 52 (2000) 181-188
5. DeMers M.N. GIS Modelling in Raster (2002), Wiley, New York
6. De Vries S., and Goossen M. Modelling recreational visits to forests and nature areas. Urban For. Urban Green. 1 (2002) 5-14
7. EEA, 1999. Environment in the European Union at the Turn of the Century-Summary. European Environment Agency, Copenhagen.
8. ESRI, 1996a. ArcView Spatial Analyst. Environmental Systems Research Institute Inc., Redland.
9. ESRI, 1996b. ArcView. Environmental Systems Research Institute Inc., Redland.
10. Fry G.L.A., Skar B., Jerpåsen G., Bakkestuen V., and Erikstad L. Locating archaeological sites in the landscape: a hierarchical approach based on landscape indicators. Landscape Urban Plan. 67 (2004) 97-107
11. In: Germundsson T., and Schlyter P. (Eds). Atlas över Skåne (1999), Sveriges Nationalatlas, Metria, Uppsala
12. Haider W., and Hunt L. Visual aesthetic quality of northern Ontario's forested shorelines. Environ. Manage. 29 (2002) 324-334
13. Harrison C., Burgess J., Millward A., and Dawe G. Accessible Natural Greenspace in Towns and Cities (1995), English Nature, Peterborough
14. Hörnsten L., and Fredman P. On the distance to recreational forests in Sweden. Landscape Urban Plan. 51 (2000) 1-10
15. Kaplan R., and Kaplan S. The Experience of Nature (1989), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
16. Kardell, L., 1982. Hur Linköpingsborna utnyttjar sina stadsnära skogar. Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet, Avd. för landskapsvård, Uppsala.
17. Kardell, L., Lindhagen, A., 1995. Förändringar i Växjöbornas friluftsliv mellan 1975 och 1992. Sveriges lantbruksuniversitet, Institutionen för skoglig landskapsvård, Uppsala.
18. Kliskey A.D. Recreation terrain suitability mapping: a spatially explicit methodology for determining recreation potential for resource use assessment. Landscape Urban Plan. 52 (2000) 33-43
19. Koch, N.E., 1978. Skovenes friluftsfunktion i Danmark. Del I. Befolkningens anvendelse af landets skove. Det forstlige Forsoegsvaesen, Copenhagen.
20. Koch, N.E., 1984. Skovenes friluftsfunktion i Danmark. Del III. Anvendelsen av skovene lokalt betragtet. Det forstlige Forsoegsvaesen, Copenhagen.
21. Koch, N.E., Jensen, F.S., 1988. Skovenes friluftsfunktion i Danmark. Del IV. Befolkningens oensker til skovenes og det åbne lands udformning. Det forstlige Forsoegsvaesen, Copenhagen.
22. Länsstyrelsen, 1995. Mark och natur. Underlagsrapport för Miljövårdsprogram för Skåne 1995. Länsstyrelsen Malmöhus län, Malmö.
23. Lantmäteriverket, 1998. GSD Terrängkartan, dnr 507-98-4720.
24. Lee T.R. Perceptions, Attitudes and Preferences in Forests and Woodlands (2001), Forestry Commission, Edinburgh
25. Lindhagen, A., 1996. Forest recreation in Sweden: four case studies using quantitative and qualitative methods. Sveriges Lantbruksuniversitet, Institutionen för skoglig landskapsvård, Uppsala.
26. Malmö stad, 2000. Översiktsplan för Malmö 2000. Malmö Stadsbyggnadskontor 2000.
27. Medley K.E., Pickett S.T.A., and McDonnell M.J. Forest-landscape structure along an urban-to-rural gradient. Prof. Geogr. 47 (1995) 159-168
28. Miller R.W. Urban Forestry-Planning and Managing Urban Greenspaces (1997), Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ
29. Millward H. Public recreational access in the countryside: concepts and measures of physical rigour. J. Rural Stud. 7 (1991) 241-251
30. Nilsson, N.-E. (Ed.), 1990. National Atlas of Sweden. The Forests. Skogsstyrelsen, Jönköping.
31. Ode A.K., and Fry G.L. Visual aspects in urban woodland management. Urban For. Urban Green. 1 (2002) 15-24
32. Parsons R., and Daniel T.C. Good looking: in defense of scenic landscape aesthetics. Landscape Urban Plan. 60 (2002) 43-56
33. Ribe R.G. The aesthetics of forestry: what has empirical preference research taught us?. Environ. Manage. 13 (1989) 55-74
34. Roovers P., Hermy M., and Gulinck H. Visitor profile, perceptions and expectations in forests from a gradient of increasing urbanisation in central Belgium. Landscape Urban Plan. 59 (2002) 129-145
35. SCB, 2001. Statistisk årsbok för Sverige 2001. Statistiska centralbyrån, Stockholm.
36. Schmithüsen F., and Wild-Eck S. The meaning of forests to people in the cities-analysis of selected studies on uses and perceptions of urban forests. In: Krott M., and Nilsson K. (Eds). Urban Forestry, Multiple-use of Town Forests in International Comparison (1998), Forestry Institutions and Administrations, Wuppertal 73-94
37. Silvennoinen H., Alho J., Kolehmainen O., and Pukkala T. Prediction models of landscape preferences at the forest stand level. Landscape Urban Plan. 56 (2001) 11-20
38. Skage, O., 1998. De allmänna vägarnas uppdelning av landskapet i västra Skåne. In Skärbäck, E. (Ed.), Hur en region nybildas, Öresundsymposium 98, Alnarp 13 maj 1998. Öresundsuniversitetet, Lund.
39. Skärbäck, E., 1975. Öresundsförbindelser, landskapsanalys, delutredning utförd för den svenska öresundsdelegationens expertgrupp för plan- och miljöfrågor. Statens Naturvårdsverk, Vällingby.
40. SSK, 1989. Det sydvästskånska landskapet inför 1990-talet. Sydvästra Skånes Kommunalförbund, Malmö.
41. Summit J., and Sommer R. Further studies of preferred tree shapes. Environ. Behav. 31 (1999) 550-576
42. Willis K.G., and Garrod G.D. An individual travel-cost method of evaluating forest recreation. J. Agric. Econ. 42 (1991) 33-42