Pseudo multiple and enlarged mandibular canals: The evidence-based response of cone beam computed tomography

Dentomaxillofacial Radiology

Volumn 35, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 217-218

  Rouas, P ^a,b   Delbos, Y ^b   Nancy, J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ BORDEAUX 1   (France)

^b HÔPITAL SAINT ANDRÉ   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; HUMAN; IMAGING; JAW DISEASE; LETTER; MANDIBLE; PANORAMIC RADIOGRAPHY; TOOTH IMPLANTATION;

HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MALE; MANDIBLE; MANDIBULAR NERVE; MIDDLE AGED; RADIOGRAPHY, PANORAMIC; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 33646586341     PISSN: 0250832X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1259/dmfr/34883479     Document Type: Letter

References (5)

1. Auluck A, Pai KM, Shetty C. Pseudo bifid mandibular canal. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2005; 34: 387-388.
2. Sanchis JM, Penarrocha M, Soler F. Bifid mandibular canal. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2003; 61: 422-424.
3. Claeys V, Wackens G. Bifid mandibular canal: literature review and case report. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2005; 34: 55-58.
4. Ludlow JB, Davies-Ludlow LE, Brooks SL. Dosimetry of two extraoral direct digital imaging devices: NewTom cone beam CT and Orthophos Plus DS panoramic unit. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 2003; 32: 229-234.
5. Slovis TL. Children, computed tomography radiation dose, and the as low as reasonably achievable (ALARA) concept. Pediatrics 2003; 112: 971-972.