Fourier transform rheometry on carbon black filled polybutadiene compounds

Journal of Applied Polymer Science

Volumn 100, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 5102-5118

  Leblanc, Jean L ^a  

^a SORBONNE UNIVERSITÉ   (France)

Author keywords

Elastomers; Fillers; Polybutadiene; Rheology; Viscoelastic properties

Indexed keywords

CARBON BLACK; ELASTOMERS; FILLERS; FOURIER TRANSFORM INFRARED SPECTROSCOPY; POLYBUTADIENES; STRAIN; VISCOELASTICITY;

CIS-1,4 POLYBUTADIENE; FOURIER TRANSFORM RHEOMETRY; STRAIN SWEEP TEST; VISCOELASTIC PROPERTIES;

RHEOLOGY;

ELASTOMER; FOURIER TRANSFORM ANALYSIS; POLYBUTADIENE; RHEOLOGY; SOFTWARE; TECHNOLOGY; VISCOELASTICITY;

EID: 33646570246     PISSN: 00218995     EISSN: 10974628     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/app.21941     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Leblanc, J. L.; de la Chapelle, C. Rubb Chem Technol 2003, 76, 287.
2. Leblanc, J. L. J Appl Polym Sci 2003, 89, 1101.
3. Payne, A. R.; Whittaker, R. E. Rubb Chem Technol 1971, 44, 440.
4. Wang, M. J. Rubb Chem Technol 1998, 71, 520.
5. Maier, P. G.; Göritz, D. Kautsch Gummi Kunstst 1996, 49, 18.
6. Chazeau, L.; Brown, J. D.; Yanyo, L. C.; Sternstein, S. S. Polym Compos 2000, 21, 202.
7. Sternstein, S. S.; Zhu, A. Macromolecules 2002, 35, 7262.
8. Leblanc, J. L. Kautsch Gummi Kunstst 1996, 49, 258
9. Leblanc, J. L. Prog Polym Sci 2002, 27, 627.
10. Leblanc, J. L.; Mongruel, A. Prog Rubb Plast Technol 2001, 17, 162.
11. Wilhelm, M. Macromol Mater Eng 2002, 287, 83.
12. Wilhelm, M.; Reinheimer, P.; Ortseifer, M. Rheol Acta 1999, 38, 349.
13. Guth, E.; Simha, R. Kolloid Zeitschrift 1936, 74, 266
14. Guth, R.; Gold, O. Phys Rev 1938, 53, 322.
15. Leblanc, J. L. Investigating the non-linear viscoelastic behaviour of rubber materials through Fourier transform rheometry, 9th International Seminar on Elastomers, Kyoto, Japan, April 3-5, 2003.
16. 1) or T(n/1) is used for the torque signal.
17. By courtesy of H. Buhrin (Alpha Technologies); strain and torque signals were acquired (10,240 pt at 512 pt/s) on another RPA instrument, equipped with a similar data acquisition system; FT was performed with our calculation algorithm using 8192 data points.
18. In using Eq. (3) (and subsequent ones) to model T(3/1) variation with strain, one may express the deformation (or strain) γ either in degree angle or in percentages. Obviously, all parameters remain the same except C, whose value depends on the unit for γ. The following equality applies for the conversion, C(γ, deg) = 180 α/100 π × C(γ, %), where α = 0.125 rad.