Offshore decommissioning issues: Deductibility and transferability

Energy Policy

Volumn 34, Issue 15, 2006, Pages 1992-2001

  Parente, Virginia ^a   Ferreira, Doneivan ^b   Moutinho dos Santos, Edmilson ^a   Luczynski, Estanislau ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMPINAS   (Brazil)

^c Grupo de Estudos e Pesquisas Econômico Energéticas GEPEE   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Decommissioning; Petroleum installations; Regulation

Indexed keywords

ENERGY POLICY; FINANCE; INSTALLATION; REGULATORY COMPLIANCE;

DECOMMISSIONING; PETROLEUM INSTALLATIONS; PROJECT FINANCING;

DRILLING PLATFORMS;

INSTALLATION; OFFSHORE ENGINEERING; PETROLEUM;

EID: 33646569961     PISSN: 03014215     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2005.02.008     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. ANP-Brazilian Petroleum Agency, 2003. Anuário Estatístico da Indústria Brasileira do Petróleo, Rio de Janeiro.
2. Athanassopoulos, J.D.E., Dalton, J.S., Fisher, A.P., 1999. Offshore oil platform decommissioning: a comparative study of strategies and the ecological, regulatory, political and economic issues involved in the decommissioning planning. Masters Project, University of California Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara.
3. Coleman, H., 1998. Decommissioning of offshore installations: a global problem-a costly solution? Management report-executive summary (Online). Available in: http://www.ftenergy.com/oil/oilrs28.htm (February 27, 1999).
4. Ferreira, D.F., 2003. Fiscal treatment: decommissioning and bonds. Chapter 5. Anticipating Impacts of Financial Assurance Requirements for Offshore Decommissioning: a Decision Model for the Oil Industry. Doctoral Dissertation, State University, Campinas, Brazil, pp. 164-168.
5. Ferreira D.F., Suslick S.B., and Moura P.C.S. Analysis of environmental bonding system for oil and gas projects. Natural Resources Research-NNR 12 4 (2003) 273-290
6. Ferreira D.F., Suslick S.B., Farley J., Constanza R., and Krivov S. A decision model for financial assurance instruments in the upstream petroleum sector. Energy Policy 32 (2004) 1173-1184
7. IRS-US International Revenue Service, 1999. Electronic Publication.
8. Kapoen, W., 2001. The reuse of offshore production facilities - tax wise? Proceedings of the International conference on the reuse of offshore production facilities: making it happen. Den Helder, The Netherlands. [CD ROM presentation].
9. NPD-Norwegian Petroleum Directorate, 2000. Interview with NPD officials. Stavanger.
10. Osmundsen P., and Tveterås R. Decommissioning of petroleum installations-major policy issues. Energy Policy 31 (2003) 1579-1588
11. Phillips Petroleum Company Norway, 1999a. Ekofisk oil and gas field decommissioning. Public Announcement: Decommissioning Plan for the North Sea Oil and Gas Project, Oslo.
12. Phillips Petroleum Company Norway, 1999b. Phillips Maureen platform decommissioning and reuse. Online since: 1999. Available in: http://www.philips66.com/maureen (June 07, 2000).
13. Prognos, 1997. Social-economic impact of varying decommissioning options: the international offshore oil and gas industry. The Offshore Decommissioning Communication Project. Prognos Internal Report. Prognos AG, Basel.
14. Schiozer, R.F., 2002. A royalty relief model for mature oil fields. Masters Thesis, State University Campinas, Brazil.
15. Viscusi W.K., Vernon J.M., and Harrington J.E. Economics of Regulation and Antitrust. third ed (2000), MIT Press, Cambridge, MA, London
16. Young, E., McMichael, C., 1998. Impacts of production sharing terms on investment-community performance statistics. In: SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition. Proceedings, New Orleans, LA, SPE 52017.