Perceptions regarding Elk in Northern Arizona

Wildlife Society Bulletin

Volumn 34, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 27-35

  Heydlauff, Andrea L ^a,b   Krausman, Paul R ^a   Shaw, William W ^a   Marsh, Stuart E ^a,c,d,e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

^b WILDLIFE CONSERVATION SOCIETY   (United States)

^c Arid Lands Resource Sciences Graduate Interdisciplinary PhD Program

^d Geography and Regional Development   (United States)

^e Arizona Remote Sensing Center   (United States)

Author keywords

Attitudes; Cervus elaphus; Elk; Managers; Public opinion; Survey

Indexed keywords

ANTHROPOGENIC EFFECT; INFORMATION SYSTEM; PUBLIC ATTITUDE; WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT;

ARIZONA; NORTH AMERICA; ROCKY MOUNTAINS; UNITED STATES;

BOS TAURUS; CERVUS ELAPHUS;

EID: 33646562500     PISSN: 00917648     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2193/0091-7648(2006)34[27:PREINA]2.0.CO;2     Document Type: Review

References (43)

1. Adams, A. W. 1982. Migration. Pages 301-321 in J. W. Thomas, and D. E. Toweill, editors. Elk of North America: ecology and management. Stackpole Brooks, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, USA.
2. Alt, K. L., M. R. Frisina, and F. J. King. 1992. Coordinated management of elk and cattle: A perspective-Wall Creek Wildlife Management Area. Rangelands 14:12-15.
3. Arizona Game and Fish Department. 1972. Arizona big game bulletin: elk. Arizona Game and Fish Department, Form 4038.
4. Bose, J. 2001. Nonresponse bias analysis at the National Center for educational statistics. Proceedings of Statistics Canada Symposium. Achieving data quality in a statistical agency: a methodological perspective 1-9.
5. Bryant, L. D., and C. Maser. 1982. Classification and distribution. Pages 1-59 in J. W. Thomas, and D. E. Toweill, editors. Elk of North America: ecology and management. Stackpole Books, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, USA.
6. Chase, L. C., T. M. Schusler, and D. J. Decker. 2000. Innovations in stakeholder involvement: What's the next step? Wildlife Society Bulletin 28: 208-217.
7. Connelly, N. A., T. L. Brown, and B. A. Knuth. 2000. Assessing the relative importance of recall bias and nonresponse bias and adjusting for those biases in statewide angler surveys. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 5:19-29.
8. Conover, M. R. 1994. Perceptions of grass-roots leaders of the agricultural community about wildlife damage on their farms and ranches. Wildlife Society Bulletin 22:94-100.
9. Conover, M. R. 1997. Monetary and intangible valuation of deer in the United States. Wildlife Society Bulletin 25:298-305.
10. Conover, M. R. 1998. Perceptions of American agricultural producers about wildlife on their farms and ranches. Wildlife Society Bulletin 3:597-604.
11. Conover, M. R., and D. J. Decker. 1991. Wildlife damage to crops: perceptions of agricultural and wildlife professionals in 1957 and 1987. Wildlife Society Bulletin 19:46-52.
12. Culhane, P. J. 1981. Public lands politics: Interest group influence on the forest service and the Bureau of Land Management. John Hopkins, Baltimore, Maryland, USA.
13. Decker, D. J., T. L. Brown, and W. F. Siemer, editors. 2001. Human dimensions of wildlife management in North America. The Wildlife Society, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
14. Decker, D. J., C. C. Krueger, R. A. Baer, Jr., B. A. Knuth, and M. E. Richmond. 1996, From clients to stakeholders: a philosophical shift for fish and wildlife management. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 1:70-82.
15. Dillman, D. A. 1978. Mail and telephone surveys: the total design method. John Wiley and Sons, New York, New York, USA.
16. Freddy, D. J., G. C. White, M. C. Kneeland, R. H. Kahn, J. W. Unsworth, W. J. deVergie, V. K. Graham, and J. H. Ellenberger. 2004. How many mule deer are there? Challenges of credibility in Colorado. Wildlife Society Bulletin 32: 916-927.
17. Enck, J. W., and D. J. Decker. 1997. Examining assumptions in wildlife management: a contribution of Human Dimensions Inquiry. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 2:56-72.
18. Gerrans, J. 1982. The habitat partnership program in Colorado. Rangelands 14:84-87.
19. Harris, L. K., P. R. Krausman, and W. W. Shaw. 1995. Human attitudes and mountain sheep in a wilderness setting. Wildlife Society Bulletin 1:66-72.
20. Heydlauff, A. L. 2003. Perceptions regarding elk and elk management in northern Arizona. Thesis, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
21. Hoffmeister, D. F. 1986. Mammals of Arizona. University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA.
22. Kamman, J., and K. Ingley. 2000. "Surprise! Arizona's population beats expectations." The Arizona Republic. 29 December 2000, section C: 12.
23. Kellert, S. R. 1981. Wildlife and the private landowner. Pages 18-34 in R. T. Dumke, G. V. Berger, and J. R. March, editors. Proceedings of the Wildlife Management on Private Lands Symposium. LaCrosse, La Crosse, Wisconsin, USA.
24. Knight, B. R. 1970. The Sun River elk herd. Wildlife Monographs 23.
25. Lane, J., D. Bell, W. Brady, P. Cimmellaro, C. Dobson, S. Gilstrap, P. R. Krausman, N. Lewis, P. Ogden, B. Prosser, G. Ruyle, L. Smith, N. Waller, and S. Williams. 2001. Assessment of U.S. Forest Service methods for determining livestock grazing capacity on national forests in Arizona. Final report to Arizona's Governor, Jane D. Hull.
26. Langenau, E. E., Jr., and R. B. Peyton. 1983. Policy implications of human dimensions research for wildlife information and education programs. Transactions of the Northeastern Fish and Wildlife Conference 39:119-135.
27. Lee, M. E., and R. Miller. 2003. Managing elk in the wildland-urban interface: attitudes of Flagstaff, Arizona residents. Wildlife Society Bulletin 31:185-191.
28. Long, M. E. 1996. Colorado's Front Range. National Geographic 190(5):80-103.
29. Loomis, J. B., J. Cooper, and S. Allen. 1988. The Montana elk hunting experience: a contingent valuation assessment of economic benefits to hunters. Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks, Helena, Montana, USA.
30. Mankin, P. C., R. E. Warner, and W. L. Anderson. 1999. Wildlife and the Illinois public: a benchmark study of attitudes and perceptions. Wildlife Society Bulletin 2:465-472.
31. Petyton, R. B., and E. E. Langenau. 1985. A comparison of attitudes held by BLM biologists and the general public towards animals. Wildlife Society Bulletin 13:117-120.
32. Phillips, M. L., K. J. Boyle, and A. G. Clark. 1998. A comparison of opinions of wildlife managers and the public on endangered species management. Wildlife Society Bulletin 3:605-613.
33. Potter, D. R. 1982. Recreational use of elk. Pages 701-740 in D. E. Toweill, and J. W. Thomas, editors. North American elk: ecology and management. Wildlife Management Institute, Washington, D.C., USA.
34. Reading, R. P., B. J. Miller, and S. R. Kellert. 1999. Values and attitudes toward prairie dogs. Anthrozoos 12:43-51.
35. Skovlin, J. M. 1982. Habitat requirements and evaluations. Pages 368-413 in J. W. Thomas, and D. E. Toweill, editors. Elk of North America: ecology and management. Stackpole Books, Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, USA.
36. Sokal, R. R., and F. J. Rohlf. 1981. Biometry. Second edition. W. H. Freeman, New York, New York, USA.
37. Thompson, M. J., and R. E. Henderson. 1998. Elk habituation as a credibility challenge for wildlife professionals. Wildlife Society Bulletin 3:477-483.
38. Torstenson, W. L. F., M. W. Tess, and J. E. Knight. 2002. Elk management strategies and profitability of beef cattle ranches. Journal of Range Management 55:117-126.
39. United States Bureau of the Census. 1991. Statistical abstract of the United States: 1991. One-hundred eleventh edition. U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington D.C., USA.
40. Van Dyke, F. G., W. C. Klein, and S. T. Stewart. 1998. Long-term range fidelity in Rocky Mountain elk. Journal of Wildlife Management 62:1020-1035.
41. Vitousek, P. M., C. M. D'Antonio, L. L. Loope, and R. Westbrooks. 1996. Biological invasions as global environmental change. American Scientist 84: 468-478.
42. Wisdom, M. J., and J. G. Cook. 2000. North American elk. Pages 694-726 in S. Demarais, and P. R. Krausman, editors. Ecology and management of large mammals in North America. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey, USA.
43. Witmer, G. 1990. Re-introduction of elk in the United States. Journal of the Pennsylvania Academy of Sciences 3:131-135.