Non-rigid shape comparison of implicitly-defined curves

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 3752 LNCS, Issue , 2005, Pages 222-234

  Thiruvenkadam, Sheshadri R ^a   Graisser, David ^b   Chen, Yunmei ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

LEVEL CONTROL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; TOPOLOGY; VECTOR QUANTIZATION;

ARBITRARY TOPOLOGY; CARDIAC DATA; IMPLICITLY-DEFINED CURVES; NON-RIGID SHAPE COMPARISON;

VARIATIONAL TECHNIQUES;

EID: 33646559578     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/11567646_19     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (27)

1. Bakircioglu, M., Joshi, S. and Miller, M. Landmark matching on brain surfaces via large deformation diffeomorphisms on the sphere, Proc. of SPIE Med. Imag. Proc., no. 3661,pp.710-715, July 1999.
2. Bookstein, F. L. Morphometric Tools for Landmark data, Cambridge Univ.Press, New York, 1991
3. Camion, V. and Younes, L. Geodesic interpolating splines, In Proc. of EMM-CVPR01, vol 2134 of Lecture Notes in Comp.Sc., pp.513-527. Springer, 2001.
4. Chen, Y., Thiruvenkadam, S., Gopinath, K., Briggs, R. FMR Image registration Using the Mumford-Shah Functional and Shape Information, World Multiconference on Systems, Cybernetics and Informatics, pp.580-583, 2002.
5. Clarysee, P. and Friboulet, D. Tracking geometrical descriptors on 3-D deformable surfaces:Application to the left-ventricular surface of the heart,IEEE Trans. Med.Imag., vol. 16, pp. 392-404, Aug. 1997.
6. Daatzikos, C. and Bryan, N. R. 1996. Using a deformable surface model to obtain a shape representation of the cortex, IEEETrans.Med.Imag.vol.15, pp.785-795.
7. Dupuis, P., Grenander, U. and Miller, M. 1998. A variational formulation of a problem in image matching, Quarterly of Applied Mathematics,no. 56, pp. 587-600.
8. Glaunes, J., Trouve, A. and Joshi, S. 2004. Diffeomorphic matching of distributions:A new approach for unlabelled point-sets and sub-manifolds matching, Proc.IEEE CVPR 2004, vol. 2, pp.712-718.
9. Glaunes, J., Vaillant, M. and Osher, S. 2004. Landmark Matching via Large Deformation Diffeomorphisms on the Sphere, J.Math.Img and Vision, vol. 20, pp.179-200.
10. Guo, H., Rangarajan, A. and Twining, J. C. 2004. Non-rigid registration of shapes via diffeomorphic point matching, IEEE International Symposium on Biomedical Imaging: Macro to Nano, pp.924 - 927.
11. Gwydir, S. H. and Buettner, M. H. 1994. Non-Rigid motion analysis and feature labelling of the growth cone, Proc.IEEE workshop Biomed. Img. Anal., pp. 80 - 87.
12. Huang, X., Paragios, N. and Younes, L. 2003. Registration of Structures in Arbitrary Dimension: Implicit Representations, Mutual Information & Free Form Deformations, Technical Report DCS-TR-520, Division of Computer and Information Sciences, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, April. 2003.
13. Joshi, S. C., Miller, I. M. and Miller, I. M. 2000. Landmark matching via large deformation diffeomorphisms, IEEE Trans. on Img.Proc., vol. 9, no.8.,pp. 1357-1370.
14. Kambhamettu, C. and Goldgof, B. D. 2003. 3D Nonrigid Motion Analysis under Small Deformations, Image and Vision Computing J, vol. 21, no. 3, pp. 229-245.
15. Laskov, P. and Kambhamettu, C. 2003. Curvature-Based Algorithms for Non-rigid Motion and Correspondence Estimation, IEEE Trans. PAMI, vol. 25, no.10, pp.1349-1354.
16. Loncaric, S. 1998. A survey of shape analysis techniques, Pattern Recognit., vol.31, no.8, pp.983-1001.
17. Maintz, J. and Viergever, M. 1998. A survey for Medical Image Registration. Medical Image Analysis, vol. 2, pp. 1-36.
18. Marsl, S. and Twining, C.J. 2004. Constructing diffeomorphic representations for the groupwise analysis of nonrigid registrations of medical images, IEEE Trans. on Med.Imag., vol 23, no. 8, pp.1006 - 1020
19. Matheny, A. and Goldgof, B. D. 1995. Use of three and four dimensional surface harmonics for rigid and non-rigid shape recovery and representation,IEEE. Trans. PAMI, vol.17, pp.967-981.
20. Meier, D. and Fisher, E. 2002. Parameter Space Warping: Shape-Based Correspondence Between Morphologically Different Objects IEEE. Trans. on Med.Imag, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 31-47.
21. Memoli, F., Sapiro, G. and Osher, S.J., D. 2004. Solving Variational problems and Partial differential equations mapping into general target manifolds, J.Comp.Phys, 195, pp.263-292.
22. Osher, J.S. and Fedkiw, R. 2003. Level Set Methods and Dynamic Implicit Surfaces. Springer-Verlag, New York.
23. Paragios, N., Rousson, M. and Ramesh, V. 2003. Non-rigid registration using distance functions. Computer Vision and Understanding, vol.89, pp. 142-165.
24. Rousson, M. and Paragios, N. 2002. Shape priors for level set representations, Proceedings of Computer Vision-ECCV2002, pp. 7892.
25. Tagare, H.D., O'Shea, D. and Dunn, M.S. 2002. Non-Rigid Shape Comparison of Plane curves in Images, J.Math.Img and Vision., vol. 16, pp. 57-68.
26. Thompson, P. and Toga, A. 1996. Surface-Based technique for warping three-dimensional images of the brain,IEEE Trans.Med.Imag, vol.15, pp.402-417.
27. Veltkamp, R. and Hagedoorn, M. 1999. State-of-the-art in Shape Matching, Tech. rep. UU-CS-1999-27, Utrecht University.