When is a description not an explanation: A response to Armstrong et al. (2006)

Developmental Psychobiology

Volumn 48, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 332-334

  Tyler, Amber N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GREENSBORO   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AGE DETERMINATION; HUMAN; HUMAN DEVELOPMENT; LEARNING; MEDICAL RESEARCH; NERVE CELL PLASTICITY; NOTE; PREPUBERTY; VISUAL DEPRIVATION;

EID: 33646555153     PISSN: 00121630     EISSN: 10982302     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/dev.20136     Document Type: Note

References (5)

1. Armstrong, V. L., Brunet, P. M., He, C., Nishimura, M., Poole, H. L., & Spector, F. J. (2006). What is so critical?: A commentary on the reexamination of critical periods. Developmental Psychobiology, 48, 326-331.
2. Levi, D. (2005). Perceptual learning in adults with amblyopia: A re-evaluation of critical periods in human vision. Developmental Psychobiology, 46, 222-232.
3. Lewis, T. L., & Maurer, D. (2005). Multiple sensitive periods in human visual development: Evidence from visually deprived children. Developmental Psychobiology, 46, 163-183.
4. Michel, G. F., & Tyler, A. N. (2005). Critical period: A history of the transition from questions of when, to what, to how. Developmental Psychobiology, 46, 156-162.
5. Sathian, K. (2005). Visual cortical activity during tactile perception in the sighted and the visually deprived. Developmental Psychobiology, 46, 279-286.