Modeling methyl isothiocyanate soil flux and emission ratio from a field following a chemigation of metam-sodium

Journal of Environmental Quality

Volumn 35, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 707-713

  Li, Lin Ying ^a   Barry, Terrell ^a   Mongar, Kevin ^a   Wofford, Pamela ^a  

^a CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BROMINE; DISPERSIONS; FUMIGATION; INDUSTRIAL EMISSIONS; PESTICIDES; PLASTIC PRODUCTS; SODIUM; TOXICITY;

AIR MONITORING; METAM-SODIUM DECOMPOSITION; RECEPTOR LOCATIONS; SURFACE DRIP IRRIGATION SYSTEMS;

SOILS;

AGRICULTURAL CHEMICAL; ISOTHIOCYANIC ACID DERIVATIVE; METHAM SODIUM; METHYL BROMIDE; METHYLISOTHIOCYANATE; PESTICIDE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ARTICLE; CALCULATION; CHEMIGATION; DECOMPOSITION; DISPERSION; INDUSTRIAL SOURCE COMPLEX DISPERSION MODEL; IRRIGATION (AGRICULTURE); RISK ASSESSMENT; SOIL POLLUTION; SURFACE DRIP IRRIGATION SYSTEM;

ISOTHIOCYANATES; MODELS, THEORETICAL; SOIL POLLUTANTS; THIOCARBAMATES;

EID: 33646546730     PISSN: 00472425     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2134/jeq2005.0216     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Agresti, A., and B. Finlay. 1986. Statistical methods for the social sciences. 2nd ed. Dellen Publ. Co., San Francisco, CA.
2. Ajwa, H.A., T. Trout, J. Mueller, S. Wilhelm, S.D. Nelson, R. Soppe, and D. Shatley. 2002. Application of alternative fumigants through drip irrigation systems. Phytopathology 92:1349-1355.
3. Basile, M., N. Senesi, and F. Lamberti. 1986. A study of some factors affecting volatilization losses of 1,3-dichloropropene (1,3-D) from soil. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 17:269-279.
4. Budney, L.J., 1977. Guidelines for air quality maintenance planning and analysis. Vol. 10. Procedures for evaluating air quality impact of new stationary sources. USEPA Rep. 450/4-77-001. USEPA, Office of Air Quality and Standards, Research Triangle Park, NC.
5. CARB. 2004. Report for air monitoring around a tarped, drip irrigation application of metam sodium in Ventura County, Spring 2002. California Environ. Protection Agency, Air Resources Board, Sacramento, CA.
6. CDPR. 2002. Evaluation of methyl isothiocyanate as a toxic air contaminant (TAC-2002-01). California Environ. Protection Agency, D. of Pesticide Regulation, Sacramento, CA.
7. CDPR. 2005. Summary of pesticide use report data in 2003: Indexed by chemical. California Environ. Protection Agency, Dep. of Pesticide Regulation, Sacramento, CA.
8. Johnson, B., T. Barry, and P. Wofford. 1999. Workbook for Gaussian modeling analysis of air concentration measurements. California Environ. Protection Agency, Dep. of Pesticide Regulation, Sacramento, CA.
9. Lee, S., R. McLaughlin, M. Harnly, R. Gunier, and R. Kreutzer. 2002. Community exposures to airborne agricultural pesticides in California: Ranking of inhalation risks. Environ. Health Perspect. 110:1175-1184.
10. Noling, J.W., and J.O. Becker. 1994. The challenge of research and extension to define and implement alternatives to methyl bromide. J. Nematol. Suppl. 26(4s):573-586.
11. Papiernik, S.K., R.S. Dungan, W. Zheng, et al. 2004a. Effect of application variables on emissions and distribution of fumigants applied via subsurface drip irrigation. Environ. Sci. Technol. 38:5489-5496.
12. Papiernik, S.K., et al. 2004b. Effect of surface tarp on emissions and distribution of drip-applied fumigants. Environ. Sci. Technol. 38:4254-4262.
13. Pruett, S.B., L.P. Myers, and D.E. Keil. 2001. Toxicology of metam sodium. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health 4:207-222.
14. Ross, L.J., B. Johnson, K.D. Kim, and J. Hsu. 1996. Prediction of methyl bromide flux from area sources using the ISCST model. J Environ. Qual. 25:885-891.
15. Saeed, I.A.M., D.I. Rouse, and J.M. Harkin. 2000. Methyl isothiocyanate volatilization from fields treated with metam-sodium. Pestic. Manage. Sci. 56:813-817.
16. Sullivan, D.A., M.T Holdsworth, and D.J. Hlinka. 2004a. Control of off-gassing rates of methyl isothiocyanate from the application of metam-sodium by chemigation and shank injection. Atmos. Environ. 38:2457-2470.
17. Sullivan, D.A., M.T. Holdsworth, and D.J. Hlinka. 2004b. Monte Carlo-based dispersion modeling of off-gassing releases from the fumigant metam-sodium for determining distances to exposure endpoints. Atmos. Environ. 38:2471-2481.
18. USEPA. 1995. User's guide for the Industrial Source Complex (ISC3) dispersion models. Vol. 1. User instructions and Vol. 2. Description of model algorithms. USEPA Rep. 4545/B-95-003a&b. USEPA, Office of Air Quality and Standards, Research Triangle Park, NC.
19. USEPA. 1997. Metam sodium as an alternative to methyl bromide for fruit and vegetable production and orchard replanting. Methyl bromide alternatives case studies. Vol. 3. USEPA Rep. 430-R-97-030. USEPA, Washington, DC.
20. USEPA. 2002. Addendum: User's guide for the Industrial Source Complex (ISC3) dispersion models. Vol. 1. User instructions. USEPA, Office of Air Quality and Standards, Research Triangle Park, NC.
21. Wang, D., S.R. Yates, F.F. Ernst, J.A. Knuteson, and G.E. Brown, Jr. 2001. Volatilization of 1,3-dichloropropene under different application methods. Water Air Soil Pollut. 127:109-123.
22. Yates, S.R., F.F. Ernst, J.Y. Gan, F. Gao, and M.V. Yates. 1996. Methyl bromide emissions from a covered field: II. Volatilization. J. Environ. Qual. 25:192-202.