Sampling plans based on balanced incomplete block designs for evaluating the importance of computer model inputs

Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference

Volumn 136, Issue 9, 2006, Pages 3203-3220

  Morris, Max D ^a   Moore, Leslie M ^b   McKay, Michael D ^b  

^a E005A Lagomarcino Hall   (United States)

^b LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

Author keywords

Balanced incomplete block design; Computer experiment; Experimental design; Sensitivity analysis; Uncertainty analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 33646536785     PISSN: 03783758     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jspi.2005.01.001     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Box G.E.P., and Behnken D.W. Some new three-level designs for the study of quantitative variables. Technometrics 2 (1960) 455-475
2. Cukier R.L., Fortuin C.M., Shuler K.E., Petschek A.G., and Schaibly J.H. Study of the sensitivity of coupled reaction systems to uncertainties in rate coefficients, I Theory. J. Chem. Phys. 59 (1973) 3873-3878
3. Currin C., Mitchell T., Morris M., and Ylvisaker D. Bayesian prediction of deterministic functions, with applications to the design and analysis of computer experiments. J. Amer. Statist. Assoc. 86 (1991) 953-963
4. David F.N., and Barton D.E. Combinatorial Chance (1962), Charles Griffin and Company, London
5. Grewank A. On automatic differentiation. In: Ira M., and Tanabe K. (Eds). Mathematical Programming. Recent Developments and Applications (1989), Kluwer, Boston 83-108
6. John P.W.M. Statistical Design and Analysis of Experiments (1971), The Macmillan Company, New York
7. Johnson M.E., Moore L.M., and Ylvisaker D. Minimax and maximin distance designs. J. Statist. Plann. Inference 26 (1990) 131-148
8. Kostreva, M.M., 1996. Sensitivity analysis for mathematical modeling of fires in residential buildings. National Institute of Standards and Technology Report NIST-GCR-95-683.
9. McKay, M.D., 1995. Evaluating prediction uncertainty. Los Alamos National Laboratory Report NUREG/CR-6311, LA-12915-MS.
10. McKay M.D., Conover W.J., and Beckman R.J. A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code. Technometrics 21 (1979) 239-245
11. Oakley J.E., and O'Hagan A. Probabilistic sensitivity of complex models. a Bayesian approach. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. Ser. B 66 (2004) 751-769
12. Sacks J., Welch W.J., Mitchell T.J., and Wynn H.P. Design and analysis of computer experiments. Statist. Sci. 4 (1989) 409-435
13. Saltelli A. Making best use of model evaluations to compute sensitivity indices. Comput. Phys. Commun. 145 (2002) 280-297
14. Saltelli A., Andres T.H., and Homma T. Some new techniques in sensitivity analysis of computer model output. Computat. Statist. Data Anal. 15 (1993) 211-238
15. Saltelli, A., Chan, K., Scott, M. (Eds.), 2000a. Sensitivity Analysis. Wiley, New York.
16. Saltelli A., Tarantola S., and Campolongo F. Sensitivity analysis as an ingredient of modeling. Statist. Sci. 15 (2000) 377-395
17. Sobol' I.M. Sensitivity estimates for nonlinear mathematical models. Mat. Model. 2 (1990) 112-118 (in Russian) (transl.: Sobol', I.M., 1993, Sensitivity analysis for nonlinear mathematical models. Math. Modelling Comput. Exp. 1, 407-414)