Biodiversity and the local context: linking seminatural grasslands and their future use to social aspects

Environmental Science and Policy

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 350-359

  Stenseke, Marie ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GOTHENBURG   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Biodiversity; Landscape management; Local context; Resilience; Seminatural grasslands; Sweden

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOTOPE; CULTURAL VALUE; ECONOMIC ASPECT; ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT; GRASSLAND; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; LAND USE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RURAL AREA; SOCIAL ASPECT; SOCIAL STRUCTURE; SPECIES DIVERSITY; SPECIES RICHNESS; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; SWEDEN;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 33646535627     PISSN: 14629011     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2006.01.007     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Bergman K.-O., Askling J., Ekberg O., Ignell H., Wahlman H., and Milberg P. Landscape effects on butterfly assemblage in an agricultural region. Ecography 27 (2004) 619-628
2. In: Berkes F., Colding J., and Folke C. (Eds). Navigating Social and Ecological Systems. Building Resilience for Complexity and Change (2003), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
3. In: Brouwer F., and Louwe P. (Eds). CAP Regimes and the European Countryside (2000), CAB International, Wallingford
4. Brown G., Smith C., Alessa L., and Kliskey A. A comparison of perceptions of biological value with scientific assessment of biological importance. Appl. Geogr. 24 (2004) 161-180
5. Carpenter S., Walker B., Anderies J.M., and Abel N. From metaphor to measurement: resilience of what to what?. Ecosystems 4 (2001) 765-781
6. Cousins S.A.O., Lavorel S., and Davies I. Modelling the effects of landscape pattern and grazing regimes on the persistence of plant species with high conservation value in grasslands in south-eastern Sweden. Landscape Ecol. 18 (2003) 315-332
7. Deutsch L., Folke C., and Skånberg K. The critical natural capital of ecosystem performance as insurance for human well-being. Ecol. Econ. 44 (2003) 205-217
8. Emanuelsson, U., Berg, Å., Svensson, R., Pehrson, I., 2001. Management of seminatural grasslands-economy and biodiversity. Mistra Programme Plan January 2001, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala.
9. Evans N., Gaskell P., and Winter M. Re-assessing agrarian policy and practice in local environmental management: the case of beef cattle. Land Use Policy 20 (2003) 231-242
10. Forsberg, G., Carlbrand, E., 1993. Mälarbygden-en kreativ region? En studie av Mälardalens landsbygd i förändring. Research reports from the Department of Human Geography, Uppsala University, no. 107, Uppsala.
11. In: Gunderson L.H., Holling C.S., and Peterson G.D. (Eds). Barriers and Bridges to the Renewal of Ecosystems and Institutions (1995), Columbia University Press, New York
12. Gustavsson R., and Peterson A. Authenticity in landscape conservation and management-the importance of the local context. In: Palang H., and Fry G. (Eds). Landscape Interfaces: Cultural Heritage in Changing Landscapes. Landscape Series vol. 1 (2003), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht 319-356
13. Hägerstrand, T., 1993. Samhälle och natur. NordREFO 1993:1, Region och miljö, pp. 14-59.
14. Hägerstrand, T., 1995. A look at the political geography of environmental management. LLASS Working Paper No. 17, Department of Geography, University College Dublin.
15. Harrison C., and Burgess J. Valuing nature in context: the contribution of common-good approaches. Biodivers. Conserv. 9 (2000) 1115-1130
16. Holling C.S. Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 4 (1973) 1-23
17. Ingold T. The temporality of landscape. World Archaeol. 25 2 (1993) 2
18. Lindborg, R., 2004. Land use change in space and time-implications for plant species conservation in semi-natural grasslands. Department of Botany, Stockholm University, Doctoral dissertations.
19. Mazorra A.P. Agri-environmental policy in Spain. The agenda of socio-political developments at the national regional and local levels. J. Rural Stud. 17 (2001) 81-97
20. Norgaard R.B. Development Betrayed. The End of Progress and a Co-Evolutionary Revisioning of the Future (1994), Routledge, London
21. Olsson, P., 2003. Building capacity for resilience in social-ecological systems. Department of Systems Ecology, Stockholm University, Doctoral Dissertations.
22. Pinto-Correia, T., Gustavsson, R., Pirnat, J. (in press). Bridging the gap: towards more sensitive and creative landscape approaches across various levels of decisions. Landscape Ecol.
23. Pred A. Place, Practice and Structure: Social and Spatial Transformations in Southern Sweden 1750-1850 (1986), Polity Press, Cambridge
24. Pykälä J. Mitigating human effect on European biodiversity through traditional animal husbandry. Conserv. Biol. 14 (2000) 705-712
25. Robertson D.P., and Hull R.B. Public ecology: an environmental science and policy for global society. Environ. Sci. Policy 6 (2003) 399-410
26. Rskr 2001/02:36. 2001. Svenska miljömål-delmål och åtgärdsstrategier (Swedish Parliament Decision).
27. Selman P. Community participation in the planning and management of cultural landscapes. J. Environ. Plann. Manage. 47 (2004) 365-392
28. Statistics Sweden. Official statistical databases on agriculture, forestry and population.
29. Stenseke M. Landscape values. The prospects for communicative planning in landscape management in Sweden. In: Pierce J.T., Prager S.D., and Smith R.A. (Eds). Reshaping of Rural Ecologies, Economies and Communities. Conference Proceedings, Commission of the Sustainability of Rural Systems, International Geographical Union. Simon Fraser University, Vancouver (2000) 285-297
30. Stenseke M. Bönder och naturbetesmarker. Del 1: Bygdeperspektiv. Choros 2004 vol. 1 (2004), Department of Human and Economic Geography, Göteborg University
31. Stenseke M. The human factor in biodiversity. In: Palang H., Sooväili H., Antrop M., and Setten G. (Eds). European Rural Landscapes: Permanence, Persistence and Change in the Globalising Environment (2004), Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht 397-410
32. Swedish Board of Agriculture, 2000. SJVFS 2000:132. Statens jordbruksverks förekrifter om stöd för miljövänligt jordbruk.
33. Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, National Heritage Board & Swedish Board of Agriculture, 2005. Odlingslandskap i förändring. En uppföljning av LIM:s referensområden. Rapport 5420.
34. Terkenli T.S. Towards a theory of the landscape: the Aegean landscape as a cultural image. Landscape Urban Plann. 57 (2001) 197-208
35. Thackway R., and Olsson K. Public/private partnerships and protected areas: selected Australian case studies. Landscape Urban Plann. 44 (1999) 87-97
36. Tress B., Tress G., Décamps H., and d'Hauteserre A.-M. Bridging human and natural science in landscape research. Landscape Urban Plann. 57 (2001) 137-141
37. Volker K. Local commitment for sustainable rural landscape development. Agric. Ecosyst. Environ. 63 (1997) 107-120
38. Yarwood R., and Evans N. Livestock, locality and landscape: EU regulations and the new geography of Welsh farm animals. Appl. Geogr. 23 (2003) 137-157
39. Zachrisson, A., 2004. Co-management of Natural Resources. Paradigm Shifts, Key Concepts and Cases. Report no: 1. Mountain Mistra Programme report, Umeå.