Perceived value: A low-cost approach to evaluate meetingware

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 2806, Issue , 2003, Pages 109-125

  Antunes, Pedro ^a   Costa, Carlos J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LISBON   (Portugal)

^b INSTITUTO UNIVERSITÁRIO DE LISBOA ISCTE IUL   (Portugal)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GROUPWARE;

HIGH COSTS; LOW COST APPROACH; PERCEIVED VALUE; PRODUCT ATTRIBUTES;

COSTS;

EID: 33646535580     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-39850-9_10     Document Type: Review

References (39)

1. Aiken M, Vanjani M (1998) An automated GDSS facilitator. 28th Annual Conference of the Southwest Decision Sciences Institute. Dallas, Texas.
2. Araujo R, Santoro F, Borges M (2002) The CSCW lab for groupware evaluation. In: Groupware: Design, Implementation and Use. 8th International Workshop on Groupware. LNCS, Springer-Verlag, La Serena, Chile.
3. Baeza-Yates R, Pino J (1997) A first step to formally evaluate collaborative work. In: Proceedings of the International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work. Phoenix, Arizona.
4. Baker K, Greenberg S, Gutwin C (2002) Empirical development of a heuristic evaluation methodology for shared workspace groupware. In: Proceedings of the 2002 ACM conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work. New Orleans.
5. Beyer H, Holtzblatt K (1998) Contextual Design: Defining Customer-Centered Systems. Morgan Kaufmann.
6. Bostrom R, Aiken M, Motiwalla L, Sheng O, Nunamaker J (1990) ESP: An expert system for pre-session group decision support systems planning. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Third Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. Kailua-Kona, Hawaii, pp 279-286.
7. Briggs B, Nunamaker J, Tobey D (2001) The technology transition model: A key to self-sustaining and growing communities of GSS users. In: Proceedings of the 34th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Hawaii.
8. Briggs R, Adkins M, Mittleman D, Kruse J, Miller S, Nunamaker J (1999) A technology transition model derived from field investigation of GSS use aboard the USS Coronado. Journal of Management Information Systems 15 (3).
9. Briggs R, Vreede G (2001) ThinkLets: Achieving predictable, repeatable, patterns of group interaction with group support systems (GSS). Proceedings of the 34th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.
10. Chiasson M, Lovato C (2001) Factors influencing the formation of a user's perceptions and use of a DSS software innovation. The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems 32 (3), Summer: 16-35.
11. Collazos C, Guerrero L, Pino J, Ochoa S (2002) Evaluating collaborative learning processes. In: Groupware: Design, Implementation and Use. 8th International Workshop on Groupware. LNCS, Springer-Verlag, La Serena, Chile.
12. Conklin E (1992) Capturing organizational memory. In: Proceedings of GroupWare '92. California, pp 133-137.
13. Costa C, Antunes P (2002) Handheld CSCW in the Meeting Environment. In: J Haake, J Pino (eds.) Groupware: Design, Implementation, and Use. 8th International Workshop on Groupware, CRIWG 2002, vol. 2440. LNCS, Springer-Verlag, La Serena, Chile, pp 47-60. ISBN: 3-540-44112-3.
14. DeBaud J, Schmid K (1999) A systematic approach to derive the scope of software product lines. In: Proceedings of the 21st international conference on Software engineering. Los Angeles.
15. Dennis A, Nunamaker J, Vogel D (1991) A comparison of laboratory and field research in the study of electronic meeting systems. Journal of Management Information Systems 7 (3): 107-135.
16. DeSanctis G, Snyder J, Poole M (1994) The meaning of the interface: A functional and holistic evaluation of a meeting software system. Decision Support Systems 11: 319-335.
17. Fjermestad J, Hiltz S (1999) An assessment of group support systems experimental research: Methodology and results. Journal of Management Information Systems 15 (3): 7-149.
18. Grudin J (1994) Groupware and social dynamics: Eight challenges for developers. Communications of the ACM 37 (1), January: 92-105.
19. Hollingshead A, McGrath J (1995) Computer-assisted groups: A critical review of the empirical research. In: R Guzzo, E Salas (eds.) Team Effectiveness and Decision Making in Organizations. Jossey-Bass Publishers.
20. Hughes J, King V, Rodden T, Andersen H (1994) Moving out from the control room: ethnography in system design. In: Proceedings of CSCW '94, pp 429-439.
21. McGrath J (1984) Groups: Interaction and performance. Prentice-Hall.
22. Millen D, Fontaine M, Muller M (2002) Understanding the benefits and costs of communities of practice. Communications of the ACM 45 (4), April: 69-73.
23. Munkvold B, Anson R (2001) Organizational Adoption and Diffusion of Electronic Meeting Systems: A Case Study. Proceedings of the 2001 International ACM SIGGROUP Conference on Supporting Group Work. Boulder, Colorado, pp 279-287.
24. Nunamaker J, Dennis A, Valacich J, Vogel D, George J (1991) Electronic meeting systems to support group work: Theory and practice at Arizona. Communications of the ACM 34 (7): 40-61.
25. Nunamaker J, Vogel D, Heminger A, Martz B (1989) Experiences at IBM with group support systems: A field study. Decision Support Systems 5: 183-196.
26. Orlikowski W, Gash D (1994) Technological frames: making sense of information technology in organizations. ACM Transactions on Information Systems 12 (2): 174-207.
27. Ovaska S (1999) Lots of data, lots of evaluation - lots of findings? SIGGROUP Bulletin 20 (2), August: 33-35.
28. Pervan G (1994) The measurement of GSS effectiveness: A meta-analysis of the literature and recommendations for future GSS research. In: Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh Hawaii International Conference on Systems Sciences. Hawaii.
29. Pidd M (1996) Tools for Thinking. Wiley.
30. Pinelle D, Gutwin C (2000) A review of groupware evaluations. In: Proceedings of 9th IEEE WETICE Infrastructure for Collaborative Enterprises.
31. Pinsonneault A, Kraemer K (1989) The impact of technological support on groups: An assessment of the empirical research. Decision Support Systems 5 (3): 197-216.
32. Pressman R (2000) Software Engineering a Practitioner's Approach, 5th Edition. Trans. European Adaptation. McGraw-Hill, Inc.
33. Romano N, Nunamaker J (2001) Meeting analysis: Findings from research and practice. Proceeding of the 34th Hawaii International Conference on Systems Science. Hawaii.
34. Stylianou A, Kumar R, Khouja M (1997) A total quality management-based systems development process. The DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems 28 (3), Summer 59-71.
35. The 3M Meeting Management Team (1994) Mastering Meetings. McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York.
36. Tung L, Turban E (1998) A proposed framework for distributed group support systems. Decision Support Systems 23: 175-188.
37. Vicente K (2002) HCI in the global knowledge-based economy: Designing to support worker adaptation. In: J Carrol (ed.) Human Computer Interaction in the New Millennium. Addison-Wesley.
38. Yin R (1994) Case Study Research: Design and Methods. SAGE.
39. Zigurs I (1993) Methodological and measurement issues in group support systems research. In: L Jessup, J Valacich (eds.) Group Support Systems: New Perspectives. Macmillan, pp 112-122.