The Minimal Clinically Important Difference of the Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Symptom Severity Scale

Journal of Hand Surgery

Volumn 31, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 739-740

  Chung, Kevin C ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN HEALTH SYSTEM   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

STEROID;

ARTICLE; CARPAL TUNNEL SYNDROME; DRUG RESPONSE; HAND SURGERY; HUMAN; INJECTION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MEDICAL RESEARCH; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT ASSESSMENT; PHYSICIAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RATING SCALE; RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC; RISK ASSESSMENT; SCORING SYSTEM; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; SYMPTOM SEVERITY SCALE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TREATMENT RESPONSE;

EID: 33646535132     PISSN: 03635023     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2006.03.011     Document Type: Note

References (5)

1. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. (1988), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ 8-14
2. Beaton D.E., Bombardier C., Katz J.N., and Wright J.G. A taxonomy for responsiveness. J Clin Epidemiol 54 (2001) 1204-1217
3. Özyürekoǧlu T., McCabe S.J., Goldsmith L.J., and LaJoie A.S. The minimal clinically important difference of the carpal tunnel syndrome Symptom Severity Scale. J Hand Surg 31A (2006) 733-738
4. Jaeschke R., Singer J., and Guyatt G.H. Measurement of health status. ascertaining the minimal clinically important difference. Control Clin Trials 10 (1989) 407-415
5. Wright J.G. The minimal important difference. who's to say what is important?. J Clin Epidemiol 49 (1996) 1221-1222