Comparing academic hyperlink structures with journal publishing in Korea: A social network analysis

Science Communication

Volumn 27, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 540-564

  Kim, Hyo ^a   Park, Han Woo ^b   Thelwall, Mike ^c  

^a Ajou University   (South Korea)

^b Yeungnam University   (South Korea)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WOLVERHAMPTON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Cybermetrics; Korea; Social network analysis; Web indicators; Webometrics

Indexed keywords

EID: 33646531426     PISSN: 10755470     EISSN: 15528545     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1075547006288037     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Arunachalam, S., and M. J. Doss. 2000. Mapping international collaboration in science in Asia through coauthorship analysis. Current Science 79 (5). 621-628.
2. Bar-Ilan, J. 2004. A microscopic link analysis of academic institutions within a country: The case of Israel. Scientometrics 59 (3). 391-403.
3. Barnett, G. A., J. A. Danowski, and W. D. J. Richards. 1993. Communications networks and network analysis: A current assessment. Progress in Communication Sciences 12 (2). 1-21.
4. Bjorneborn, L., and P. Ingwersen. 2001. Perspectives of webometrics. Scientometrics 50 (1). 65-82.
5. Borgatti, S. P., M. G. Everett, and L. C. Freeman. 2002. UCINET for Windows. Cambridge, MA: Analytic Technologies.
6. Borgman, C. L., and J. Furner, eds. 2001. Academic communication and bibliometrics 36. Medford, NJ: Information Today.
7. Brin, S., and L. Page. 1998. The anatomy of a large scale hypertextual Web search engine. Computer Networks and ISDN Systems 30 (1-7). 107-117.
8. Cawkell, T. 2000. Visualizing citation connections. In The Web of knowledge: A festschrift in honor of Eugene Garfield, edited by B. Cronin, 177-194. Medford, NJ: Information Today.
9. Cronin, B. 2001. Bibliometrics and beyond: Some thoughts on Web-based citation analysis. Journal of Information Science 27 (1). 1-7.
10. Finholt, T. A. 2001. Collaboratories. In Annual review of information science and technology 36, edited by B. Cronin and D. Shaw, 73-107. Medford, NJ: Information Today.
11. Finholt, T. A., and L. Sproull. 1990. Electronic groups at work. Organizational Science 1: 41-64.
12. Freeman, L. C. 1979. Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification. Social Networks 1: 215-239.
13. Garfield, E. 1964. Science citation index: A new dimension in indexing. Science 144 (3619). 649-654.
14. Garfield, E. 1974. Historiographs, librarianship, and the history of science. Essays of an Information Scientist 2: 136-150. http://www.garfield. library.upenn.edu/essays/v2p134y1974-76.pdf.
15. Giddens, A. 1979. Central problems in social theory: Action, structure, and contradiction in social analysis. Berkeley: University of California Press.
16. Giddens, A. 1986. Constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
17. Glänzel, W. 1995. International scientific collaboration in a changing Europe: A bibliometric analysis of coauthorship links and profiles of 5 East-European countries in the sciences and social sciences, 1984-1993. Science and Science of Science 4: 24-31.
18. Glänzel, W., and A. Schubert. 2001. Double effort = double impact? A critical view at international co-authorship in chemistry. Scientometrics 50 (2). 199-214.
19. Harries, G., D. Wilkinson, L. Price, R. Fairclough, and M. Thelwall. 2004. Hyperlinks as a data source for science mapping. Journal of Information Science 30 (5). 436-447.
20. Haythornthwaite, C., and B. Wellman. 1998. Work, friendship and media use for information exchange in a networked organization. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 46 (12). 1101-1114.
21. Heimeriks, G., M. Hörlesberger, and P. van den Besselaar. 2003. Mapping communication and collaboration in heterogeneous research networks. Scientometrics 58 (2). 391-413.
22. Ingwersen, P. 1998. The calculation of Web impact factors. Journal of Documentation 54 (2). 236-243.
23. International Telecommunication Union. 2004. Digital Access Index. http://www.itu.int/ITUD/ict/dai/index.html.
24. Koku, E., N. Nazer, and B. Wellman. 2001. Netting scholars: Online and offline. American Behavioral Scientist 43: 1750-1772.
25. Korea Network Information Center. 2004. Survey on the computer and Internet usage. http://isis.nic.or.kr/eng_report_down/upload/summary200312_eng. pdf.
26. Kraut, R. E., C. Egido, and J. Galegher. 1990. Patterns of contact and communication in scientific research collaboration. In Intellectual teamwork, edited by J. Galegher, R. E. Kraut, and C. Egido, 149-171. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
27. Leydesdorff, L. 1989. Words and co-words as indicators of intellectual organization. Research Policy 18: 209-223.
28. Leydesdorff, L., and M. Curran. 2000. Mapping university-industry- government relations on the Internet: The construction of indicators for a knowledge-based economy. Cybermetrics4. http://www.cindoc.csic.es/cybermetrics/ articles/v4i1p2.html.
29. Leydesdorff, L., and I. Hellsten. 2005. Metaphors and diaphors in science communication: Mapping the case of stem-cell research. Science Communication 27: 64-99.
30. Marshakova, I. V. 1973. System of document connections based on references. Nauchno-Teknicheskaia Informatsiia 2: 3-8.
31. Merton, R. K. 1973. The sociology of science: Theoretical and empirical investigations. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
32. Nentwich, M. 2003. Cyberscience: Research in the age of the Internet. Vienna: Austrian Academy of Sciences Press.
33. Nerdi. 2002. Knowledge production in the new digital networks. http://www.niwi.knaw.nl/nerdi/.
34. Newman, M. E. J. 2000. The structure of scientific collaboration networks. http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/98/2/404.
35. Park, H. W. 2002. Examining the determinants of who is hyperlinked to whom: A survey of Webmasters in Korea. First Monday 7 (11). http://www. firstmonday.org/issues/issue7_11/park/.
36. Park, H. W. 2005. A comparison of the knowledge-based innovation systems in the economies of South Korea and the Netherlands using triple helix indicators. Scientometrics 65 (1). 3-27.
37. Park, H. W., and M. Thelwall. 2003. Hyperlink analyses of the World Wide Web: A review. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication 8 (4). http://www.ascusc.org/jcmc/vol8/issue4/park.html.
38. Park, H. W., and M. Thelwall. 1998. Academic communication in developmental dyslexia: Influence of network structure on change in a hybrid problem area. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 49 (2). 151-168.
39. Scott, J. 1991a. Networks of corporate power: A comparative assessment. Annual Review of Sociology 17: 181-203.
40. Scott, J. 1991b. Social network analysis: A handbook. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
41. Small, H. 1973. Co-citation in the scientific literature: A new measure of the relationship between two documents. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 24 (4). 265-269.
42. Small, H. 1999. Visualizing science through citation mapping. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 50 (9). 799-813.
43. Smith, A., and M. Thelwall. 2002. Web impact factors for Australasian universities. Scientometrics 54 (1-2). 363-380.
44. Thelwall, M. 2002a. Research dissemination and invocation on the Web. Online Information Review 26 (6). 413-420.
45. Thelwall, M. 2002b. The top 100 linked pages on UK university Web sites: High counts are not usually directly associated with quality scholarly content. Journal of Information Science 28 (6). 485-493.
46. Thelwall, M. 2003. What is this link doing here? Beginning a fine-grained process of identifying reasons for academic hyperlink creation. Information Research 8 (3). http://informationr.net/ir/8-3/paper151.html.
47. Thelwall, M. 2004. Link analysis: An information science approach. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
48. Thelwall, M., and G. Harries. 2004. Do better scholars' Web publications have significantly higher online impact? Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology 55 (2). 149-159.
49. Thelwall, M., and R. Tang. 2003. Disciplinary and linguistic considerations for academic Web linking: An exploratory hyperlink mediated study with Mainland China and Taiwan. Scientometrics 58 (1). 153-179.
50. Thelwall, M., R. Tang, and E. Price. 2003. Linguistic patterns of academic Web use in Western Europe. Scientometrics 56 (3). 417-432.
51. Vaughan, L., and M. Thelwall. 2005. A modeling approach to uncover hyperlink patterns: The case of Canadian universities. Information Processing & Management 41 (2). 347-359.
52. Walsh, J. P., and N. G. Maloney. 2002. Computer network use, collaboration structures and productivity. In Distributed work, edited by P. Hinds and S. Kiesler, 433-458. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
53. Walsh, J. P., and N. G. Maloney. 2003. Problems in scientific collaboration: Does email hinder or help? http://tigger.uic.edu/%7Ejwalsh/ WalshMaloneyAAAS.pdf.
54. Wasserman, S., and K. Faust. 1994. Social network analysis: Methods and applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
55. White, H. C., S. A. Boorman, and R. L. Breiger. 1976. Social structure from multiple networks I: Block models of roles and positions. American Journal of Sociology 81 (4). 730-780.
56. White, H. D., and B. C. Griffith. 1982. Author co-citation: A literature measure of intellectual structure. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 32 (3). 163-172.
57. Wilkinson, D., G. Harries, M. Thelwall, and E. Price. 2003. Motivations for academic Web site interlinking: Evidence for the Web as a novel source of information on informal scholarly communication. Journal of Information Science 29 (1). 59-66.