An end to all things? - Plants and their names

Australian Systematic Botany

Volumn 19, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 115-133

  Stevens, Peter F ^a  

^a MISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANCESTRY; ANGIOSPERM; HIERARCHICAL SYSTEM; PHYLOGENETICS; PLANT; TAXONOMY;

LINNAEA; MAGNOLIOPHYTA;

EID: 33646526898     PISSN: 10301887     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1071/SB05011     Document Type: Review

References (189)

1. Aarsleff H (1976) Wilkins, John. In 'Dictionary of scientific biography, vol. XIV, Verrill-Zwelfer'. (Ed. CC Gillispie) pp. 361-381. (Charles Scribner's Sons: New York)
2. Anderberg AA, Rydin C, Kallersjö M (2002) Phylogenetic relationships in the order Ericales s.l.: analyses of molecular data from five genes from the plastid and mitochondrial genomes. American Journal of Botany 89, 677-687.
3. Angiosperm Phylogeny Group Bremer K, Chase MW, Stevens PF (1998) An ordinal classification for the families of flowering plants. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 85, 531-553.
4. Angiosperm Phylogeny Group Bremer B, Bremer K, Chase MW, Reveal JL, Soltis DE, Soltis PS, Stevens PF (2003) An update of the Angiosperm Phylogeny Group classification for the orders and families of flowering plants: APG II. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 141, 399-436. doi: 10.1046/j.1095-8339. 2003.t01-1-00158.x
5. Ashlock PD (1971) Monophyly and associated terms. Systematic Zoology 20, 63-69.
6. Backlund A, Bremer K (1998) To be or not to be - principles of classification and monotypic plant families. Taxon 47, 391-401.
7. Barkley TM, DePriest P, Funk V, Kiger RW, Kress WJ, Moore G (2004a) Linnaean nomenclature in the 21st century: a report from a workshop on integrating traditional nomenclature and phylogenetic classification. Taxon 53, 153-158.
8. Barkley TM, DePriest P, Funk V, Kiger RW, Kress WJ, McNeill J, Moore G, Nicolson DH, Stevenson DW, Wheeler QD (2004b) A review of the International Code of Botanical Nomenclature with respect to its compatibility with phylogenetic classification. Taxon 53, 159-161.
9. Baum DA (2004) Reticulate genealogy and its bearing on the PhyloCode. In 'First international phylogenetic nomenclature meeting'. p. 1. [Abstracts]
10. Baum DA, Alverson WS, Nyffeler R (1998) A durian by any other name: taxonomy and nomenclature of core Malvales. Harvard Papers in Botany 3, 315-330.
11. Baum DA, Smith SW, Yen A, Alverson WS, Nyffeler R, Whitlock BA, Oldham RA (2004) Phylogenetic relationships of Malvatheca (Bombacoideae and Malvoideae; Malvaceae sensu lato) as inferred from plastid DNA sequences. American Journal of Botany 91, 1863-1871.
12. Bentham G (1875) On the recent progress and present state of systematic botany. Report of the British Association for the Advancement of Science, 1874, 27-54.
13. Benton MJ (2000) Stems, nodes, crown clades, and rank-free lists: is Linnaeus dead? Biological Review 75, 633-648.
14. Bergthorsson U, Richardson AO, Young GJ, Goertzen LR, Palmer JD (2004) Massive horizontal transfer of mitochondrial genes from diverse land plant donors to the basal angiosperm Amborella. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 101, 17747-17752. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0408336102
15. Berlin B (1992) 'Ethnobiological classification: principles of categorization of plants and animals in traditional societies.' (Princeton University Press: Princeton)
16. Bonde N, Westergaard B (2004) New non-Linnaean, neo-cladistic nomenclature and classification conventions exemplified by recent and fossil hominids. In 'First international phylogenetic nomenclature meeting'. p. 34. [Abstracts]
17. Boyd R (1999) Homeostasis, species and higher taxa. In 'Species: new interdisciplinary essays'. (Ed. RA Wilson) pp. 141-185. (MIT Press: Cambridge, MA)
18. Briggs BG (1996) L.A.S. Johnson - a botanical career. Telopea 6, 511-520.
19. Brown R (1818) Observations, systematical and geographical, on Professor Christian Smith's collection of plants from the vicinity of the River Congo. In 'Narrative of an expedition to explore the River Zaire, . . .'. (Ed. JK Tuckey) pp. 420-488. (John Murray: London)
20. Brummitt RK (1997) Taxonomy versus cladonomy, a fundamental controversy in biological systematics. Taxon 46, 723-734.
21. Brummitt RK (2002) How to chop up a tree. Taxon 51, 31-41.
22. Brummitt RK (2003) Further dogged defense of paraphyletic taxa. Taxon 52, 803-804.
23. Brummitt RK, Sosef MSM (1998) Paraphyletic taxa are inherent in Linnaean classification - a reply to Freudenstein. Taxon 47, 411-412.
24. Bryant HN (1994) Comments on the phylogenetic definition of taxon names and conventions regarding the naming of crown clades. Systematic Biology 43, 124-130.
25. Bryant HN (1996) Explicitness, stability, and universality in the phylogenetic definition and usage of taxon names: a case study of the phylogenetic taxonomy of the Carnivora (Mammalia). Systematic Biology 45, 174-189.
26. Bryant HN, Cantino PD (2002) A review of criticisms of phylogenetic nomenclature: is taxonomic freedom the fundamental issue? Biological Reviews 77, 39-55.
27. Buck RC, Hull DL (1969) Reply to Gregg. Systematic Zoology 18, 354-357.
28. Cain AJ (1958) Logic and memory in Linnaeus's system of taxonomy. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of London 169, 144-163.
29. Cain AJ (1959a) Deductive and inductive methods in post-Linnaean taxonomy. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of London 170, 185-217.
30. Cain AJ (1959b) The post-Linnaean development of taxonomy. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of London 170, 233-244.
31. de Candolle A-P (1813) 'Théorie élémentaire de la botanique.' (Déterville: Paris)
32. de Candolle A-P (1844) 'Théorie élémentaire de la botanique'. 3rd edn. (Roret: Paris)
33. Cantino PD (1998) Binomials, hyphenated uninomials, and phylogenetic nomenclature. Taxon 47, 425-429.
34. Cantino PD (2000) Phylogenetic nomenclature: addressing some concerns. Taxon 49, 85-93.
35. Cantino PD (2004) Classifying species versus naming clades. Taxon 53, 795-798.
36. Cantino PD, de Queiroz K (2005) 'PhyloCode: a phylogenetic code of biological nomenclature.' [http://www.ohio.edu.phylocode: consulted 6 Jan 2005]
37. Cantino PD, Olmstead RG, Wagstaff SJ (1997) A comparison of phylogenetic nomenclature with the current system: a botanical case study. Systematic Biology 46, 313-331.
38. Cantino PD, Bryant HN, De Queiroz K, Donoghue MJ, Eriksson T, Hillis DM, Lee MSY (1999) Species names in phylogenetic nomenclature. Systematic Biology 48, 790-807. doi: 10.1080/106351599260012
39. Carpenter JM (2003) Critique of pure folly. Botanical Review 69, 79-92.
40. Cellinese N, Donoghue MJ (2004) The demise of the ranked system in the arrangement of herbaria: utopia or reality? In 'First international phylogenetic nomenclature meeting'. p. 2. [Abstracts]
41. Chung C (2003) On the origin of the typological/population distinction in Ernst Mayr's changing views of species, 1942-1959. Studies in History and Philosophy of Biology and Biomedical Sciences 34C, 277-296. doi: 10.1016/S1369-8486(03)00026-8
42. Coyne JA, Orr HA (2004) 'Speciation.' (Sinauer: Sunderland, MA)
43. Crisp MJ, Chandler GT (1996) Paraphyletic species. Telopea 6, 813-844.
44. Cronquist A (1981) 'An integrated system of classification of flowering plants.' (Columbia University Press: New York)
45. Cronquist A (1987) A botanical critique of cladism. Botanical Review 53, 1-52.
46. Davis CC, Chase MW (2004) Elatinaceae are sister to Malpighiaceae: Peridiscaceae belong to Saxifragales. American Journal of Botany 91, 262-273.
47. Davis CC, Wurdack KJ (2004) Host-to-parasite gene transfer: evidence from Malpighiales. Science 305, 676-678. doi: 10.1126/science.1100671
48. Davis PD, Heywood VH (1963) 'Principles of angiosperm taxonomy.' (Oliver & Boyd: Edinburgh)
49. Darwin CD (1859) 'On the origin of species. . .' (John Murray: London)
50. Dayrat B (2004) Selecting a form of species name in the PhyloCode. In 'First international phylogenetic nomenclature meeting'. p. 3. [Abstracts]
51. Dayrat B, Schander C, Angielczyk KD (2004) Suggestions for a new species nomenclature. Taxon 53, 485-491.
52. Dobzhansky T (1951) 'Genetics and the origin of species.' 3rd edn. (Columbia University Press: New York)
53. Dominguez E, Wheeler QD (1997) Taxonomic stability is ignorance. Cladistics 13, 367-372.
54. Donoghue MJ, Cantino PD (1988) Paraphyly, ancestors and the goals of taxonomy: a botanical defence of cladism. Botanical Review 54, 107-128.
55. Donoghue MJ, Doyle JA (1989) Phylogenetic analysis of angiosperms and relationships of Hamamelidae. In 'Evolution, systematics and fossil history of the Hamamelidae, vol. 1. Introduction and 'lower' Hamamelidae'. (Eds PR Crane, S Blackmore) pp. 17-45. (Clarendon Press: Oxford)
56. Eigen E (1997) Overcoming first impressions: Georges Cuvier's types. Journal of the History of Biology 30, 179-209. doi: 10.1023/A:1004227517928
57. Ereshefsky M (2000) 'The poverty of the Linnaean hierarchy: a philosophical study of biological taxonomy.' (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge)
58. Evans RC, Campbell CS (2002) The origin of the apple subfamily (Maloideae; Rosaceae) is clarified by DNA sequence data from duplicated GBSSI genes. American Journal of Botany 89, 1478-1484.
59. Farber PL (1976) The type concept in zoology in the first half of the nineteenth century. Journal of the History of Biology 9, 93-119. doi: 10.1007/BF00129174
60. Fisher KM, Mishler BD (2004) Monography and the PhyloCode: a practical example from the moss clade Leucophanella. In 'First international phylogenetic nomenclature meeting'. p. 12. [Abstracts]
61. Forey PL (2002) Phylocode - no pain, no gain. Taxon 51, 43-54.
62. Forey PL (2005) Naming the world: is there anything left of Linnaeus? Proceedings of the California Academy of Sciences 56, suppl. 1, 182-195.
63. Freudenstein JV (1998) Paraphyly, ancestors and classification - a response to Sosef and Brummitt. Taxon 47, 95-104.
64. Futuyuma D (1998) 'Evolutionary biology.' 3rd edn. (Sinauer: Sunderland, MA)
65. Gauthier JA, de Queiroz K, Joyce WG, Parham JF, Rowe T, Calrake J (2004) A phylogenetic nomenclature for the major clades of Amniota Haeckel 1866, with emphasis on non-avian Reptilia Laurentus 1768. In 'First international phylogenetic nomenclature meeting'. p. 14. [Abstracts]
66. Gelman SA (2003) 'The essential child.' (Oxford University Press: Oxford)
67. Ghiselin MT (1974) A radical solution to the species problem. Systematic Zoology 23, 536-544.
68. Ghiselin MT (2005) Taxonomy as the organization of knowledge. Proceedings of the California Academy of Sciences 56, suppl. 1, 161-169.
69. Gilmour JSL (1940) Taxonomy and philosophy. In 'The new systematics'. (Ed. JS Huxley) pp. 461-474. (Clarendon Press: Oxford)
70. Govaerts R (2003) How many species of seed plants are there? - a response. Taxon 52, 583-584.
71. Grant V (2003) Incongruence between cladistic and taxonomic systems. American Journal of Botany 90, 1263-1270.
72. Grass Phylogeny Working Group (2001) Phylogeny and subfamilial classification of the grasses (Poaceae). Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 88, 373-457.
73. Gregg JR (1950) Taxonomy, language and reality. American Zoologist 84, 419-435.
74. Gregg JR (1968) Buck and Hull: a critical rejoinder. Systematic Zoology 17, 342-345.
75. Greuter W (2005) Linnean nomenclature and our nomenclatural codes: how many do we need? Symbolae Botanicae Upsalienses 33(3), 119-125.
76. Greuter W, McNeill J, Barrie FR, Burdet HM, Demoulin V, Filguieras TS, Nicholson DH, Sliva PC, Skog JE, Trehane P, Turland NJ, Hawksworth DL (eds) (2000) 'The international code of botanical nomenclature.' (Koeltz: Königstein)
77. Griffiths GCD (1973) Some fundamental problems in biological classification. Systematic Zoology 22, 338-343.
78. Griffiths CGD (1974) On the foundations of biological systematics. Acta Biotheoretica 23, 85-131. doi: 10.1007/BF01556343
79. Griffiths GCD (1976) The future of Linnaean nomenclature. Systematic Zoology 25, 168-173.
80. Hennig W (1966) 'Phylogenetic systematics'. (Transl. DD Davis, R Zangerl) (University of Illinois Press: Urbana)
81. Heywood V (2001) Floristics and monography - an uncertain future? Taxon 50, 361-380.
82. Hibbett DS, Donoghue MJ (1998) Intergrating phylogenetic analysis and classification in fungi. Mycologia 90, 347-356.
83. Hibbett DS, Nilsson RH, Snyder M, Fonseca M, Costanzo J, Shonfeld M (2005) Automated phylogenetic taxonomy: an example in the homobasidiomycetes (mushroom-forming fungi). Systematic Biology 54, 660-668. doi: 10.1080/10635150590947104
84. Holman EW (2002) The relation between folk and scientific classifications of plants and animals. Journal of Classification 19, 131-159. doi: 10.1007/s00357-001-0036-8
85. Holman EW (2005) Domain-specific and general properties of folk classifications. Journal of Ethnobiology 25, 71-91.
86. Hull DL (1965) The effect of essentialism in taxonomy - two thousand years of stasis. The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science 15, 314-326.
87. Hull DL (1976) Are species really individuals? Systematic Zoology 25, 174-191.
88. Hull DL, Snyder DP (1969) Contemporary logic and evolutionary taxonomy: a reply to Gregg. Systematic Zoology 18, 347-354.
89. Humphries CJ, Chappill JA (1988) Systematics as science: a response to Cronquist. Botanical Review 54, 129-144.
90. Jain R, Rivera MC, Lake JA (1999) Horizontal gene transfer among genomes: the complexity hypothesis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 96, 3801-3806. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.7.3801
91. Janovec JP, Clark LG, Mori SA (2003) Is the neotropical flora ready for the Phylocode? Botanical Review 69, 22-43.
92. Johnson LAS (1968) Rainbow's end: the quest for an optimal taxonomy. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of New South Wales 93, 8-45.
93. Jorgensen PM (2002) Two nomenclatural systems? Taxon 51, 737.
94. Jorgensen PM (2004) Rankless names in the Code? Taxon 53, 162.
95. Judd WS, Campell CA, Kellogg EA, Donoghue MJ, Stevens PF (2003) 'Plant systematics, a phylogenetic approach.' 2nd edn. (Sinauer: Sunderland, Mass.)
96. Keller RA, Boyd RN, Wheeler QD (2003) The illogical basis of phylogenetic nomenclature. Botanical Review 69, 93-110.
97. Knowlson J (1975) 'Universal language schemes in England and France, 1600-1800.' (University of Toronto Press: Toronto)
98. Knox EB (1998) The use of hierarchies as organisational models in systematics. Biological Journal of the Linnaean Society 63, 1-49. doi: 10.1006/bijl.1997.0181
99. Kojima J (2003) Apomorphy-based definition also pinpoints a node, and phylocode names prevent effective communication. Botanical Review 69, 44-58.
100. Kress WJ, Prince LM, Williams KJ (2002) The phylogeny and a new classification of gingers: evidence from molecular data. American Journal of Botany 89, 1682-1696.
101. Kron KA (1997) Exploring alternative systems of classification. Aliso 15, 105-112.
102. Kron KA, Judd WS, Stevens PF, Crayn DM, Anderberg AA, Gadek PA, Quinn CJ, Luteyn JL (2002) Phylogenetic classification of Ericaceae: molecular and morphological evidence. Botanical Review 68, 335-423.
103. Lamarck JBPA de M de (1778) 'Flore Françoise.' 3 vols. (Imprimerie Royale: Paris)
104. Laurin M, Anderson JS (2004) Meaning of the name Tetrapoda in the scientific literature: an exchange. Systematic Biology 53, 68-80. doi: 10.1080/10635150490264716
105. Lee MSY (1999) Stability of higher taxa in phylogenetic nomenclature - some comments on Moore. Zoologica Scripta 28, 361-366. doi: 10.1046/j.1463-6409. 1999.00017.x
106. Lee MSY (2001) On recent arguments for phylogenetic nomenclature. Taxon 50, 175-180.
107. Lee MSY (2002) Species and phylogenetic nomenclature. Taxon 51, 507-510.
108. Lidén M, Oxelman B (1996) Do we need "phylogenetic taxonomy"? Zoologica Scripta 25, 183-185. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-6409.1996. tb00158.x
109. Lidén M, Oxelman B, Backlund A, Andersson L, Bremer B, et al. (1997) Charlie is our darling. Taxon 46, 735-738.
110. Mahner M, Bunge M (1997) 'Foundations of biophilosophy.' (Springer: Berlin)
111. Malt BC (1995) Category coherence in cross-cultural perspective. Cognitive Psychology 29, 85-148. doi: 10.1006/cogp.1995.1013
112. Mason-Gamer RJ (2004) Reticulate evolution, introgression, and intertribal gene capture in an allohexaploid grass. Systematic Biology 53, 25-37. doi: 10.1080/10635150490424402
113. Mayr E (1942) 'Systematics and the origin of species: from the viewpoint of a zoologist.' (Columbia University Press: New York)
114. Mayr E (1957) Species concepts and definitions. In 'The species problem'. (Ed. E Mayr) pp 1-22. (American Association for the Advancement of Science: New York)
115. Mayr E (1969) 'Principles of systematic zoology.' (McGraw-Hill: New York)
116. Mayr E (1982) 'The growth of biological thought.' (Harvard University Press: Cambridge, Mass)
117. Mayr E (1995) Systems of ordering data. Biology and Philosophy 10, 419-434. doi: 10.1007/BF00857592
118. Mayr E, Ashlock PD (1991) 'Principles of systematic zoology.' 2nd edn. (McGraw Hill: New York)
119. Mayr E, Bock WJ (2002) Classifications and other ordering systems. Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research 40, 169-194. doi: 10.1046/j.1439-0469.2002.00211.x
120. McNeill J (1979) Structural value: a concept used in the construction of taxonomic classifications. Taxon 28, 481-504.
121. Mishler BD (1999) Getting rid of species. In 'Species: new interdisciplinary essays'. (Ed. RA Wilson) pp. 307-315. (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)
122. Mishler BD, Fisher KM (2004) Terminating species: a rank-free approach to terminal taxa. In 'First international phylogenetic nomenclature meeting'. p. 6. [Abstracts]
123. Monsch KA (2003) The use of apomorphies in taxonomic defining. Taxon 52, 105-107.
124. Moore G (1998) A comparison of traditional and phylogenetic nomenclature. Taxon 47, 561-579.
125. Moore G (2003) Should taxon names be explicitly defined? Botanical Review 69, 2-21.
126. Moore G (2005) A review of past and current debates in nomenclature: 250 years of progress or going around in a circle? Symbolae Botanicae Upsalienses 33(3), 109-117.
127. Moore G, Barkley TM, DePriest P, Funk V, Kiger RW, Kress WJ, Nicolson DH, Stevenson DW, Wheeler QD (2004) (065-067) Proposals to amend Article 3.1, Article 22.3, and Article 26.3. Taxon 53, 214.
128. Murphy GL (2002) 'The big book of concepts.' (MIT Press: Cambridge, MA)
129. Nelson G, Murphy DJ, Ladiges PY (2003) Brummitt on paraphyly: a response. Taxon 52, 295-298.
130. Nixon KC, Wheeler QD (1990) An amplification of the phylogenetic species concept. Cladistics 6, 211-223.
131. Nixon KC, Carpenter JM (2000) On the other "phylogenetic systematics". Cladistics 16, 298-318.
132. Nixon KC, Carpenter JM, Stevenson DW (2003) The phylocode is fatally flawed, and the Linnaean system can easily be fixed. Botanical Review 69, 111-120.
133. Nordal I, Stedje B (2005) Paraphyletic taxa should be accepted! Taxon 54, 5-8.
134. Olmstead RG, Cantino PD (2004) Phylogenetic nomenclature of Lamiales. In 'First international phylogenetic nomenclature meeting'. p. 14. [Abstracts]
135. Padian K (1999) Charles Darwin's view of classification in theory and practice. Systematic Biology 48, 352-364. doi: 10.1080/106351599260337
136. Panchen AL (1992) 'Classification, evolution and the nature of biology.' (Cambridge University Press: Cambridge)
137. Pennisi E (1996) Evolutionary and systematic biologists converge. Science 273, 181.
138. Philipson WR (1987) The treatment of isolated genera. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 95, 19-25.
139. Pleijel F, Rouse GW (2000) Least-inclusive taxonomic unit: a new concept for biology. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B. Biological Sciences 267, 627-630. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1048
140. Pleijel F, Rouse GW (2002) Ceci n'est pas une pipe: names, clades and phylogenetic nomenclature. Journal of Zoological Systematics and Evolutionary Research 4, 162-175.
141. Pryor LD, Johnson LAS (1971) 'A classification of the eucalypts.' (Australian National University: Canberra)
142. de Queiroz K (1988) Systematics and the Darwinian revolution. Philosophy of Science 55, 238-259. doi: 10.1086/289430
143. de Queiroz K (1992) Phylogenetic definitions and taxonomic philosophy. Biology and Philosophy 7, 295-313. doi: 10.1007/BF00129972
144. de Queiroz K (1997) The Linnaean hierarchy and the evolutionization of taxonomy, with emphasis on the problem of nomenclature. Aliso 15, 125-144.
145. de Queiroz K (2000) The definitions of taxon names: a reply to Stuessy. Taxon 49, 533-537.
146. de Queiroz K (2005) Linnaean, rank-based, and phylogenetic nomenclature: restoring primacy to the link between names and taxa. Symbolae Botanicae Upsalienses 33, 127-140.
147. de Queiroz K, Gauthier J (1990) Phylogeny as a central principle in taxonomy: phylogenetic definitions of taxon names. Systematic Zoology 39, 307-322.
148. de Queiroz K, Gauthier J (1992) Phylogenetic taxonomy. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 23, 449-480. doi: 10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.23.1.449
149. de Queiroz K, Gauthier J (1994) Towards a phylogenetic system of biological nomenclature. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 9, 27-31. doi: 10.1016/0169-5347(94)90231-3
150. de Queiroz K, Gauthier J (2004) Toward an integrated system of phylogenetically defined names. In 'First international phylogenetic nomenclature meeting'. p. 7. [Abstracts]
151. Rapini A (2004) Classes or individuals? The paradox of systematics revisited. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Biology and Biomedical Sciences 35, 675-695. doi: 10.1016/j.shpsc.2004.09.006
152. Raven PH, Axelrod DI (1974) Angiosperm biogeography and past continental movements. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 61, 593-673.
153. Rieseberg LH, Brouillet L (1994) Are many plant species paraphyletic? Taxon 43, 21-32.
154. Sauquet H, Doyle JA, Scharaschkin T, Borsch T, Hilu KW, Chatrou LW, Le Thomas A (2003) Phylogenetic analysis of Magnoliales and Myristicaceae based on multiple data sets: implications for character evolution. Botanical Journal of the Linnean Society 142, 125-186. doi: 10.1046/j.1095-8339.2003.00171.x
155. Schander C (1998a) Types, emendations and names - a reply to Lidén et al. Taxon 47, 401-406.
156. Schander C (1998b) Mandatory categories and impossible hierarchies - a reply to Sosef. Taxon 47, 407-410.
157. Schander C, Thollesson M (1995) Phylogenetic taxonomy - some comments. Zoologica Scripta 24, 263-268. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-6409.1995.tb00404.x
158. Schuh R (2003) The Linnaean system and its 250-year persistence. Botanical Review 69, 59-78.
159. Sereno PC (1999) Definitions in phylogenetic taxonomy: critique and rationale. Systematic Biology 48, 329-351. doi: 10.1080/106351599260328
160. Sereno PC (2004) Notation, definitional rationale, and recall in phylogenetic taxonomy. In 'First international phylogenetic nomenclature meeting'. p. 4. [Abstracts]
161. Sereno PC (2005) The logical basis of phylogenetic taxonomy. Systematic Biology 54, 595-619. doi: 10.1080/106351591007453
162. Simpson GG (1961) 'Principles of animal taxonomy.' (Columbia University Press: New York)
163. Sitte P, Weiler EW, Kadereit JW, Bresinsky A, Körner C (2002) 'Lehrbuch der Botanik für Hochschulen.' (Spektrum: Heidelberg)
164. Smedmark JEE, Eriksson T, Evans RC, Campbell CS (2003) Ancient allopolyploid speciation in Geinae (Rosaceae): evidence from nuclear granule-bound starch synthase (GBSSI) gene sequences. Systematic Biology 52, 374-385.
165. Soltis DE, Soltis PS (1990) Isozyme evidence for ancient polyploidy in primitive angiosperms. Systematic Botany 15, 328-337.
166. Sosef MSM (1997) Hierarchical models, reticulate evolution and the inevitability of paraphyletic supraspecific taxa. Taxon 46, 75-85.
167. Stace HM, Douglas AW, Sampson JF (1998) Did 'paleo-polyploidy' really occur in Proteaceae? Australian Systematic Botany 11, 613-629. doi: 10.1071/SB98013
168. van Steenis CGGJ (1978) On the doubtful virtue of splitting families. Bothalia 12, 425-427.
169. Stevens PF (1991) George Bentham and the Kew Rule. In 'Improving the stability of names: needs and options'. (Ed. DL Hawksworth) pp. 157-168. (Koeltz: Königstein)
170. Stevens PF (1994) 'The development of biological systematics.' (Columbia University Press: New York)
171. Stevens PF (1997) How to interpret botanical classifications: suggestions from history. Bioscience 47, 243-250.
172. Stevens PF (1998) What kind of classification should the practicing taxonomist use to be saved? In 'Plant diversity in Malesia III'. (Eds J Dransfield, MJE Coode, DA Simpson) pp. 295-319 (Royal Botanic Gardens: Kew)
173. Stevens PF (1999) Conventions, standards and consensus in systematic practice: How far can (or should we go? In 'Metadiversity'. (Eds RT Kaser, VC Kaser) pp. 43-50. (National Federation of Abstracting and Information Services)
174. Stevens PF (2001a) Mark Ereshefsky, 'The poverty of the Linnaean hierarchy:. . .' Journal of the History of Biology 34, 600-602.
175. Stevens PF (2001b) 'Angiosperm phylogeny website'. Available at http://www.mobot.org/MOBOT/research/APweb/ (verified 28 November 2005)
176. Stevens PF (2002) Why do we name organisms? Some reminders from the past. Taxon 51, 11-26.
177. Stuessy TF (1990) 'Plant taxonomy: the systematic evaluation of comparative data.' (Columbia University Press: New York)
178. Stuessy TF (2001) Taxon names are still not defined. Taxon 50, 185-186.
179. Takhtajan A (1997) 'The diversity and classification of flowering plants.' (Columbia University Press: New York)
180. Thorne R (2002) How many species of seed plants are there? Taxon 52, 511-512.
181. Wallace (1856) Attempts at a natural arrangement of birds. Annals and Magazine of Natural History ser. 2 16, 184-196.
182. van Welzen PC (1997) Paraphyletic groups or what should a classification entail. Taxon 46, 99-103.
183. van Welzen PC (1998) Phylogenetic versus Linnaean taxonomy, the continuing story. Taxon 47, 413-423.
184. Whewell W (1847) 'The philosophy of the inductive sciences, founded upon their history.' 2nd edn. (John W. Parker: London)
185. Wiley E (1979) An annotated Linnaean hierarchy, with comments on natural taxa and competing systems. Systematic Zoology 28, 308-337.
186. Wiley E (1981) 'Phylogenetics: the theory and practice of phylogenetic systematics.' (Wiley: New York)
187. Williams JH Jr, Friedman WE (2004) The four-celled female gametophyte of Illicium (Illiciaceae; Austrobaileyales): implications for understanding the origin and early evolution of monocots, eumagnoliids, and eudicots. American Journal of Botany 91, 332-351.
188. Winsor MP (2001) Cain on Linnaeus: the scientist-historian as unanalysed entity. Studies in the History and Philosophy of Biology and Biomedical Sciences 32, 239-254. doi: 10.1016/S1369-8486(01)00010-3
189. Winsor MP (2003) Non-essentialist methods in pre-Darwinian taxonomy. Biology and Philosophy 18, 387-400. doi: 10.1023/A:1024139523966