Education and social integration: On basic consensus and the cohesion of society

Educational Theory

Volumn 52, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 381-396

  Heyting, Frieda ^a   Kruithof, Bernard ^a   Mulder, Ernst ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33646523525     PISSN: 00132004     EISSN: 17415446     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1741-5446.2002.00381.x     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Bernard Mandeville, The Fable of the Bees or Private Vices, Public Benefits, 2 vols., in F.B. Kaye, ed., Bernard Mandeville: The Fable of the Bees or Private Vices, Public Benefits [Indianapolis: Liberty Press, 1988).
2. Hans Boutellier, Solidariteit en slachtofferschap. De morele betekenis van criminaliteit in een postmoderne cultuur [Solidarity and Victimship: The Moral Meaning of Criminality in a Postmodern Culture] (Nijmegen: Sun, 1993).
3. Leendert Groenendijk, De nadere reformatie van het gezin. De visie van Petrus Wittewrongel op de christelijke huishouding [The Further Reformation of the Family: Petrus Wittewrongel's View of the Christian Household] (Dordrecht: Van den Tol, 1984), 24.
4. Bernard Kruithof, Zonde en deugd in domineesland. Nederlandse protestanten en problemen van opvoeding zeventiende tot twintigste eeuw [Sin and Virtue in Protestant Netherlands: Dutch Protestants and Educational Problems, Seventeenth through Twentieth Century] [Groningen: Wolters-Noordhoff, 1990), 59.
5. Thomas A. Home, The Social Thought of Bernard Mandeville: Virtue and Commerce in Early Eighteenth-Century England (New York: Columbia University Press, 1978, 1-19.
6. M.M. Goldsmith, Private Vices, Public Benefits: Bernard Mandeville's Social and Political Thought (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 19851, 23.
7. Home, The Social Thought of Bernard Mandeville: Virtue and Commerce in Early Eighteenth-Century England, 6.
8. J.R. Gillis, Youth and History: Tradition and Change in European Age Relations 1770-Present (New York: Academic Press, 19811, 137.
9. J.F. Kett, Rites of Passage: Adolescence in America, 1790 to the Present (New York Basic Books, 1977), 254ff.
10. P.S. Fass, The Damned and the Beautiful: American Youth in the 1920s (New York: Oxford University Press, 19771, 22.
11. M. J. Langeveld, Beknopte theoretischepedagogiek [Concise Theory ofEducation] (Groningen/Djakarta: J.B. Wolters, 1957).
12. S. Frith, Sound Effects: Youth, Leisure, and the Politics of Kock'n Roll (New York: Pantheon Books, 1981), 181ff.
13. S. Chapple and R. Garofalo, Rock'n Roll Is Here to Pay: The History and Politics of the Music Industry (Chicago: Nelson-Hall, 1977), 46.
14. Marian De Graaf, Vrouweliikheid bii de pedagoog lean-facques Rousseau [Feminineness in lean-Tacques Rousseau's Educational Philosophy] (Amsterdam: Ph.D. diss., 19961, 152ff.
15. Niklas Luhmann, Die GeseUschaft der GeseUschaft [The Society of Society] (Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp, 19971, 24ff.
16. Talcott Parsons, The Social System (London: Routledge, 1970), 251.
17. Talcott Parsons, Social Structure and Personality (New York The Free Press, 1970), 195.
18. Jurgen Habermas, Thesen zur Theorie der Sozialisation. Stichworte und Literatur ZUI Vorlesung im Sommer-Semester 1968 [Theses on the Theory of Socialization: Keywords and Literature to the Lectures in Summer Term 19681 [Frankfurt a.M.: no publisher, 1968.
19. Harry Kunneman, De Waarheidstrechter. Een communicatietheoretisch perspectief op wetenschap en samenleving [The Funnel of Truth: A Communication-Theoretical Perspective on Science and Society] (Meppel: Boom, 1986).
20. John Rawls, A Theory of lustice (Cambridge, Mass.: Belknap Press, 1971, 12 and 136-142.
21. Jurgen Habermas, Theorie des kommunikativen Handelns [Theoq of Communicative Action] (Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp, 1981), 40 and elsewhere.
22. Wolfgang Lempert, "Zum Begriff der Emanzipation," ["On the Concept of Emancipation"] Neue Sammlung 13, no. 1 1973).
23. Richard Rorty, Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989).
24. Richard Rorty, Truth, Politics and "Post-Modernism" (Assen: Van Gorcum, 1997).
25. The paraphrasing in this paragraph is mainly based on Rorty, Contingency, Irony, and Solidarity. For "irony" see especially 73ff; for "solidarity" see especially 189ff. The willingness to acknowledge a plurality of persuasions was labeled tolerance in Richard Rorty, Objectivity, Relativism, and Truth (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991, 14.
26. Adalbert Rang, "PadagogikundPluralismus" ["Education andPluralism"], in Piidagogik und Pluralismus. Deutsche und niederlandische Erfahrungen im Umgang mit Pluralitiit in Erziehung und Erziehungswissenschaft [Education and Pluralism: German and Dutch Experiences in Dealing with Plurality in Educational Theory and Practice], ed. G. Frieda Heyting and H.-Elmar Tenorth [Weinheim: Deutscher Studien Verlag, 1994).
27. Gert Biesta, "Postmodeme Erziehung: Zwischen Kontingenz und Engagement" ["Postmodem Education: Between Contingence and Engagement"], in Padagogik und Pluralismus [Education and Pluralism], ed. Heyting and Tenorth.
28. Kaye, Bernard Mandeville.
29. F.A. Hayek, Bernard Mandeville," NEW Studies in Philosophy, Politics, Economics and the History of Ideas, ed. F.A. Hayek (London: Routledge, 1985,251-252.
30. Mandeville, Fable of the Bees or Private Vices, in Kaye, Bernard Mandeville, 27.
31. Mandeville, The Fable of the Bees or Private Vices,.
32. E.J. Hundert, The Enlightenment's Fable: Bernard Mandeville, Virtue and Commerce in Early Eighteenth-Century England (New York: Columbia University Press, 1994, 113.
33. W. Euchner, "Versuch ueber Mandevilles Bienenfabel" ["Essay on ihlandeville's Fable of the Bees"], in Bernard Mandeville, Die Bienenfabel oderprivate Laster, oeffentliche Vorteile [Bernurd Mandeville: The Fable of the Bees or Private Vices, Public Benefits], ed. W. Euchner (Frankfurt a.M.: Suhrkamp, 1980), 54-55.
34. S. Seidman, Liberalism and the Origins of European Social Theory (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1983).
35. G.D.H. Cole, "Introduction," in Jean-Jacques Rousseau, The Social Contract and Discourses, trans. G.D.H. Cole, rev. andaug. J.H. Brumfitt and J.C. Hall, ed. G.D.H. Cole(London:Dent andsons, 1986), xix.
36. Jay Weinstein, "Editorial Foreword," in Paradox and Society: The Work of Bernard Mandeviile, ed. Louis Schneider (New Brunswick: Transaction Books, 1987).
37. A.J. Kerkhof, Demens is een angstig dier. Adam Smith's theorie vanmorelegevoelens [Man Is a Fearful Animal: Adam Smith's Theory of Moral Feelings] (Meppel: Boom, 1992) 164-7.
38. Hundert, The Enlightenment's Fable: Bernard Mandeville, Virtue and Commerce in Early Eighteenth Century England.
39. Cole "Introduction," xiv.
40. Kerkhof, De mens is een angstig dier. Adam Smith's theorie van mvrele gevoelens [Man Is a Fearful Animal: Adam Smith's Theory of Moral Feelings], 166-7.
41. Hayek, "Dr Bernard Mandeville," 12.
42. Weinstein, "Editorial Foreword.".
43. Hayek, "Dr Bernard Mandeville.".
44. Norbert Elias, The Civilizing Process: State Formation and Civilization, trans. Edmund Jephcott, notes and rev. Norbert Elias [Oxford Basil Blackwell, 1982) 232.
45. Elias, The Civilizing Process: The History of Manners, trans. Edmund Jephcott (Oxford BasilBlackwell, 1978, 260ff.
46. E.C. Mossner, The Life of David Hurne [Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1970), 223.
47. Jiirgen Habermas, "Theorie der Gesellschaft oder Sozialtechnologie! Eine Auseinandersetzung mit Niklas Luhmann" ["Theory of Society or Social Technology? A Discussion with Niklas Luhmann"], in Theorie der Gesellschaft oder Sozialtechnologie [Theory of Society or Social Technology!], ed. Jiirgen Habermas and Niklas Luhmann (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1971).
48. Niklas Luhmann, Paradigm Lost: Uber die ethxche Reflexion der Moral (Paradigm Lost: On the Ethical Reflection of Morals] (Frankfurt am Main: Suhrkamp, 1990).
49. Zygmunt Bauman, Postmodem Ethics (Oxford: Blackwell, 1993).
50. Nicholas Rescher, Pluralism: Against the Demand for Consensus (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995).
51. Jerome Bruner, The Culture of Education (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1996). This book will be cited as CE in the text for all subsequent references.