Contested knowledge: Introducing Fillmore, Kerr, Stockwell, Chikritzhs, and Bostrom (2006)

Addiction Research and Theory

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 97-99

  Heim, Derek ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL LANCASHIRE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33646514920     PISSN: 16066359     EISSN: 14767392     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/16066350500537622     Document Type: Editorial

References (7)

1. Cameron, D. (2001). The End of the peer show? Addiction Research and Theory, 9, 187-192.
2. Davies, J. B. (1998). Pharmacology versus social process: Competing or complementary views on the nature of addiction? Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 80, 265-275.
3. Davies, J. B., Drucker, E., & Cameron, D. (2002). The Farmington consensus: Guilt by association. Addiction Research and Theory, 10, 329-334.
4. Fillmore, K. M., Kerr, W. C., Stockwell, T., Chikritzhs, T., & Bostrom, A. (2006). Moderate alcohol use and reduced mortality risk: Systematic error in prospective studies. Addiction Research and Theory, 14, 101-131.
5. Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
6. Lakatos, I. (1977). Philosophical papers (Vol. 1). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press (Source: www.lse.ac.uk/collections/lakatos/ scienceAndPseudoscienceTranscript.htm).
7. West, R. (2005). Time for a change: Putting the transtheoretical (stages of change) model to rest. Addiction, 100, 1036-1039.