Simultaneous object recognition and segmentation from single or multiple model views

International Journal of Computer Vision

Volumn 67, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 159-188

  Ferrari, Vittorio ^a   Tuytelaars, Tinne ^b   Van Gool, Luc ^a,b  

^a ETH ZURICH   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; APPROXIMATION THEORY; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE SEGMENTATION; LARGE SCALE SYSTEMS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS;

APPROXIMATIVE CONTOURS; FEATURE EXTRACTORS; NON-RIGID DEFORMATIONS;

OBJECT RECOGNITION;

EID: 33646513500     PISSN: 09205691     EISSN: 15731405     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11263-005-3964-7     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (36)

1. Baumberg, A. 2000. Reliable feature matching across widely separated views. In ICCV, pp. 774-781.
2. Bebis, G., Georgiopoulos, M., and Lobo, N.V. 1995. Learning geometric hashing functions for model-based object recognition. In ICCV, pp. 543-548.
3. Chum, O., Matas, J., and Obdrzalek, S. 2003. Epipolar geometry from three correspondences. In Computer Vision Winter Workshop.
4. Cyr, C. and Kimia, B. 2001. 3D object recognition using similarity-based aspect graph. ICCV, 254-261.
5. Ferrari, V. 2004. Affine Invariant Regions ++. PhD Thesis, Selected Readings in Vision and Graphics, Springer Verlag, Zuerich, CH. www.vision.ee.ethz.ch/~ferrari
6. Ferrari, V., Tuytelaars, T., and Van-Gool, L. 2003. Wide-baseline multiple-view correspondences. CVPR, 1:718-728.
7. Ferrari, V., Tuytelaars, T., and Van-Gool, L. 2004. Integrating multiple model views for object recognition. CVPR.
8. Ferrari, V., Tuytelaars, T., and Van-Gool, L. 2004. Simultaneous object recognition and segmentation by image exploration. ECCV, 1:40-54.
9. Kolmogorov, V. and Zabih, R, 2002. What energy functions can be minimized via graph cuts ? ECCV, 111:65-78.
10. Lazebnik, S., Schmid, C., and Ponce, J. 2004. Semi-local affine parts for object recognition. BMVC, 11:779-788.
11. Leibe, B. and Schiele, B. 2004. Scale-invariant object categorization using a scale-adaptive mean-shift search, DAGM, 145-153.
12. Lhuillier, M. and Quan, L. 2002. Match propagation for image-based modeling and rendering, PAMI, 24(8).
13. Lowe, D. 2001. Local feature view clustering for 3D object recognition. CVPR, 682-688.
14. Lowe, D. 2004. Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. IJCV, 60(2): 91-110.
15. Matas, J., Chum, O., Urban, M., and Pajdla, T. 2002. Robust wide baseline stereo from maximally stable extremal regions. BMVC, 384-393.
16. Mikolajczyk, K. and Schmid, C. 2001. Indexing based on scale-invariant interest points. ICCV, 1:525-531.
17. Mikolajczyk, K. and Schmid, C. 2002. An affine invariant interest point detector. ECCV, 128-142.
18. Mikolajczyk, K. and Schmid, C. 2003. A performance evaluation of local descriptors. CVPR, 11:257-263.
19. Murase, H. and Nayar, S. 1995. Visual learning and recognition of 3d objects from appearance. IJCV, 14(1).
20. Obrdzalek, S. and Matas, J. 2002. Object recognition using local affine frames on distinguished regions. BMVC, 414-431.
21. Osian, M. and Van-Gool, L. 2004. Video shot characterization. Machine Vision and Applications, 15(3): 172-177.
22. Pritchett, P. and Zisserman, A. 1998. Wide baseline stereo matching. ICCV, 754-760.
23. Rothganger, F., Lazebnik, S., Schmid, C., and Ponce, J. 2005. 3D object modeling and recognition using local affine-invariant image descriptors and multi-view spatial constraints. UCV, in press.
24. Schaffalitzky, F. and Zisserman, A. 2002. Automated scene matching in movies. In Workshop on Content-Based Image and Video Rerrieval, pp. 186-197.
25. Schaffalitzky, F. and Zisserman, A. 2002. Multi-view matching for unordered image sets. ECCV, I:414-427.
26. Schmid, C. 1996. Combining greyvalue invariants with local constraints for object recognition. CVPR, 872-877.
27. Schmid, C. 1999. A structured probabilistic model for recognition. CVPR, II:485-490.
28. Selinger, A. and Nelson, R.C. 1999. A perceptual grouping hierarchy for appearance-based 3d object recognition. Computer Vision and Image Understanding, 76(1): 83-92.
29. Sivic, J. and Zisserman, A. 2003. Video google: A text retrieval approach to object matching in videos. ICCV.
30. Swain, M.J., and Ballard, B.H. 1991. Color indexing. IJCV, 7(1):11-32.
31. Tell, D. and Carlsson, S. 2002. Combining appearance and topology for wide baseline matching. ECCV, 1:68-81.
32. Torr, P.H.S. and Murray, D.W. 1997. The development and comparison of robust methods for estimating the fundamental matrix. IJCV, 24(3): 271-300.
33. Tuytelaars, T. and Van-Gool, L. 2000. Wide baseline stereo based on local, affinely invariant regions. BMVC.
34. Tuytelaars, T., Van-Gool, L., Dhaene, L., and Koch, R. 1999. Matching affinely invariant regions for visual servoing. In Intl. Conference on Robotics and Automation, 1601-1606.
35. Yu, S.X., Gross, R., and Shi, J. 2002. Concurrent object recognition and segmentation by graph partitioning. NIPS.
36. Zhang, Z., Deriche, R., Faugeras, O., and Luong, Q. 1995. A robust technique for matching two uncalibrated images through the recovery of the unknown epipolar geometry. Artificial Intelligence, 78:87-119.