Adenomyosis: Not such an elusive diagnosis any longer

Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 225-228

  Lone, F W ^a,c   Balogun, M ^b   Khan, K S ^b  

^a TAWAM HOSPITAL   (United Arab Emirates)

^b BIRMINGHAM WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^c Clanny House   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADENOMYOSIS; ARTICLE; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS; EMBASE; FEMALE; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; HYSTERECTOMY; IMAGE ANALYSIS; MEDLINE; NON INVASIVE MEASUREMENT; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TRANSVAGINAL ECHOGRAPHY;

ENDOMETRIOSIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; ULTRASONOGRAPHY;

EID: 33646507935     PISSN: 01443615     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01443610500537856     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Arnold LL, Ascher SM, Schruefer JJ, Simon JA. 1995. The non-surgical diagnosis of adenomyosis. Obstetrics and Gynecology 86:461-465.
2. Ascher SM, Arnold LL, Patt RH, Schruefer JJ, Bagley AS, Semelka RC et al. 1994. Adenomyosis: Prospective comparison of MR imaging and transvaginal sonography. Radiology 190:803-806.
3. Azziz R. 1989. Adenomyosis: Current perspectives. Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America 16:221-235.
4. Benson RC, Sneeden VD. 1958. Adenomyosis: A reappraisal of symptomatology. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 76:1044-1057.
5. Bohlman ME, Ensor RE, Sanders RC. 1987. Sonographic findings in adenomyosis of the uterus. American Journal of Roentgenology 148:765-766.
6. Chiang CH, Chang MY, Hsu JJ, Chiu TH, Lee KF, Hsieh TT et al. 1999. Tumor vascular pattern and blood flow impedance in the differential diagnosis of leiomyoma and adenomyosis by color Doppler sonography. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 16:268-272.
7. Fedele L, Bianchi S, Dorta M, Zanotti F, Arcaini L, Carinelli S. 1992. Transvaginal ultrasonography in the diagnosis of diffuse adenomyosis. Fertility and Sterility 58:94-97.
8. Bazot M, Cortez A, Darai E, Rouger J, Chopier J, Antoine JM et al. 2001. Ultrasonography compared with magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of adenomyosis: correlation with histopathology. Human Reproduction 16:2427-2433.
9. Dueholm M, Lundorf E, Hansen ES, Sorensen JS, Ledertoug S, Olesen F. 2001. Magnetic resonance imaging and transvaginal ultrasonography for the diagnosis of adenomyosis. Fertility and Sterility 76:588-594.
10. Mark AS, Hricak H, Heinrichs LW, Hendrickson MR, Winkler ML, Bachica JA et al. 1987. Adenomyosis and leiomyoma: differential diagnosis with MR imaging. Radiology 163:527-529.
11. Muse KN. 1990. Cyclic pelvic pain. Obstetrics and Gynecology Clinics of North America 17:427-440.
12. Outwater EK, Siegelman ES, Van Deerlin V. 1998. Adenomyosis current concepts and imaging considerations. American Journal of Roentgenology 170:437-441.
13. Owolabi TO, Strickler RC. 1977. Adenomyosis: a neglected diagnosis. Obstetrics and Gynecology 50:424-427.
14. Reinhold C, McCarthy S, Bret PM, Mehio A, Atri M, Zakarian R et al. 1996. Diffuse adenomyosis: comparison of endovaginal US and MR imaging with histopathology correlation. Radiology 199:151-158.
15. Seidman JD, Kjerrulff KH. 1996. Pathologic findings from the Maryland Women's Health Study: practice patterns in the diagnosis of adenomyosis. International Journal of Gynecological Pathology 15:217-221.
16. Stovall TG, Ling FW, Crawford DA. 1990. Hysterectomy for chronic pelvic pain of presumed uterine etiology. Obstetrics and Gynecology 75:676-679.
17. Togashi K, Nishimura K, Itohoh K. 1988. Adenomyosis: diagnosis with MR imaging. Radiology 166:111-114.
18. Togashi K, Ozasa H, Konishi I, Itoh H, Nishimura K, Fujisawa I et al. 1989. Enlarged uterus: differentiation between adenomyosis and leiomyoma with MR imaging. Radiology 171:531-534.