Niall Ferguson's imperial passion

History Workshop Journal

Volumn 56, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 175-183

  Wilson, Jon ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33646506243     PISSN: 13633554     EISSN: 14774569     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/hwj/56.1.175     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Edward Said, Orientalism, London, 1979.
2. The way colonialism rested on the prospect of the colonized becoming part of metropolitan culture whilst it constructed the colonial subject as irrevocably other (the colonial desire to produce subjects who are 'White, but not quite') is a theme in the work of Homi Bhabha, in particular the essays collected in The Location of Culture, London, 1994.
3. In his Law and Society in Modern India, Delhi, 1989, Marc Galanter offers an account (which is not without its own problems) of the process by which colonial law was 'Indianized' during the twentieth century.
4. Kevin Brownlow, David Lean. A Biography, London, 1996, pp. 654, 688.
5. Niall Ferguson, Empire. How Britain made the Modern World, London, 2003.
6. For the lineaments of the debate see Catherine Hall, Civilizing Subjects, Cambridge, 2002;
7. Propaganda and Empire, the Manipulation of British Public Opinion, 1880-1960, ed. John M. MacKenzie, Manchester, 1981;
8. Bernard Porter, Britannia's Burden: the Political Evolution of Modern Britain 1851-1990, London, 1994 and
9. P. J. Marshall, 'Imperial Britain', Journal of Imperial and Commonwealth History 23:3, 1995.
10. For a discussion of the ambiguities present within the Victorian relationship between race and empire, see Robert C. Young, Colonial Desire: Hybridity in Theory, Culture, and Race, London, 1995.
11. 'Divorce Iranian Style', produced and directed by Kim Longinotto and Ziba Mir-Hossein, 20th Century Vixen Productions, 1998.
12. Seid-Gholam Hussein-Khan, Seir Mutaqherrin, or Review of Modern Times, transl. Haji Mustapha, 1926, edition New Delhi, 1986, vol. 3, pp. 191-2.