Trade-offs in assessing different energy futures: a regional multi-criteria assessment of the role of carbon dioxide capture and storage

Environmental Science and Policy

Volumn 9, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 376-391

  Shackley, Simon ^a   McLachlan, Carly ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Carbon dioxide capture and storage; Energy scenarios; Multi criteria assessment; Stakeholder perceptions

Indexed keywords

CARBON DIOXIDE; FOSSIL FUEL;

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENERGY RESOURCE; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; NUCLEAR ENERGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS; SCORING SYSTEM; UNITED KINGDOM;

EID: 33646502823     PISSN: 14629011     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2006.01.006     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Anderson K., Shackley S., Mander S., and Bows A. Decarbonising the UK: Energy for a Climate Conscious Future (2005), Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
2. Anderson, K., Bows, A., Upham, P., 2006. Growth scenarios for EU and UK aviation: contradictions with climate policy. Tyndall Centre Working Paper 84. www.tyndall.ac.uk/publications/working_papers/wp48.pdf.
3. BSI, 1992. Code of Practice for Pipelines. Part 2: Pipelines on Land-Design, Construction and Installation. BS 8010-2.8:1992, British Standards Institute.
4. Brown K., Adger N., Tompkins E., Bacon P., Shin D., and Young K. Trade-off analysis for marine protected area management. Ecol. Econ. 37 (2001) 417-434
5. Carney, S., 2005. Personal communication, based upon: Greenhouse Gas Regional Inventory Project (GRIP), software tool available from sebastian.carney@grip.org.uk.
6. DEFRA, 2004. Scientific and Technical Aspects of Climate Change, Including Impacts and Adaptation and Associated Costs. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, London. www.defra.gov.uk/environment/climatechange/pdf/cc-science-0904-pdf.
7. Devine-Wright P. Local aspects of UK renewable energy development: exploring public beliefs and policy implications. Local Econ. 10 1 (2005) 57-69
8. DTI, 2003. The Energy White Paper. Department of Trade and Industry, The Stationery Office, London.
9. DTI, 2005. Carbon Abatement Technology Strategy. Department of Trade and Industry, The Stationery Office, London.
10. DTLR, no date. Multi-Criteria Analysis Manual. Department of Transport, Local Government and the Regions, London. www.odpm.gov.uk/embedded_object.asp?id=1142252.
11. Electricity Association, 2003. Electricity Handbook. Electricity Association, London.
12. In: Gale J., and Kaya Y. (Eds). Greenhouse Gas Control Technologies vols. I and II (2003), Pergamon, Oxford
13. Gough, C., Shackley, S. (Eds.). Capturing Carbon: The Potential Role of Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage in Decarbonising the UK's Energy System, Ashgate, Aldershot, in press.
14. Gough, C., Shackley, S., 2006. Towards a multi-criteria methodology for assessment of geological carbon storage options. Climatic Change, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10584-006-0425-4.
15. IPCC, 2006. Special Report on Carbon Dioxide Capture and Storage, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, in press.
16. Meinshausen M. What does a 20 °C target mean for greenhouse gas concentrations? A brief analysis based upon multi-gas emission pathways and several climate uncertainty estimates. In: Schellnhuber H.J., Cramer W., Nakicenovic N., Wigley T., and Yohe G. (Eds). Avoiding Dangerous Climate Change (2006), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 265-280
17. NWRA, 2004. North West Sustainable Energy Strategy, Consultative Draft Version. North West Regional Assembly, Wigan.
18. RCEP, 2000. Energy: The Changing Climate. Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution, London.
19. Read P., and Lermit J. Bio-energy with carbon storage (BECS): a sequential decision approach to the threat of abrupt climate change. Energy 30 (2005) 2654-2671
20. Rhodes J., and Keith D. Engineering-economic analysis of biomass IGCC with carbon capture and storage. Biomass Bioenergy 29 6 (2005) 440-450
21. Stewart T.J., and Scott L. A scenario based framework for multi-criteria analysis in water resources planning. Water Resour. Res. 31 (1995) 2835-2843
22. Stirling A., and Mayer S. A novel approach to the appraisal of technological risk: a multi-criteria mapping of a genetically modified crop. Environ. Plann. C Govt. Policy 19 (2001) 529-555
23. Stoker G. Transforming Local Governance: From Thatcherism to New Labour (2004), Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke
24. Upham, P., Shackley, S., 2006. The case of a proposed 21.5 MWe biomass gasifier in Winkleigh, Devon: implications for governance of renewable energy planning. Energy Policy, www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30414/description?navopenmenu=1.
25. Wilbanks T., and Kates R. Global change in local places: how scale matters. Climatic Change 43 3 (1999) 601-628