Exception handling through a workflow

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 3290, Issue , 2004, Pages 37-54

  Mourão, Hernâni ^a,b   Antunes, Pedro ^b,c  

^a INSTITUTO POLITÉCNICO DE SETÚBAL   (Portugal)

^b LASIGE (Laboratory of Large Scale Information Systems)   (Portugal)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LISBON   (Portugal)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ENGINES; MULTI AGENT SYSTEMS; SEMANTIC WEB; SEMANTICS; WORK SIMPLIFICATION;

CONTROL FLOWS; DATA INTEGRITY; EXCEPTION HANDLING; PROPAGATION MECHANISM; SYSTEM INTEGRITY; USER INTERVENTION; USER INVOLVEMENT; WORKFLOW MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS;

DISTRIBUTED DATABASE SYSTEMS;

EID: 33646501386     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-30468-5_5     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Agostini, A., and De Michelis, G., 2000. Improving Flexibility of Workflow Management Systems. In: W.D. van der Aalst, J. Oberweis (Editor), BPM: Models, Techniques, and Empirical Studies. Springer-Verlag, pp. 218-234.
2. Agostini, A., and De Michelis, G., 2000. A light workflow management system using simple process models. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 9(3): 335-363.
3. Casati, F., Ceri, S., Paraboschi, S., and Pozzi, G., 1999. Specification and Implementation of Exceptions in Workflow Management Systems. ACM Transactions on Database Systems, 24(3): 405-451. ACM Press.
4. Casati, F., Ceri, S., Pernici, B., and Pozzi, G., 1996. Workflow Evolution. Data and Knowledge Engineering, 24(3): 211-238.
5. Casati, F., and Pozzi, G., 1999. Modelling exceptional behaviors in commercial workflow management systems. Proc. IFCIS, CoopIS '99. UK, pp. 127-138.
6. Chiu, D.K., Li, Q., and Karlapalem, K., 2001. WEB Interface-Driven Cooperative Exception Handling in ADOME Workflow Management System. Information Systems, 26(2): 93-120. Elsevier Publishers.
7. Dayal, U., Hsu, M., and Ladin, R., 1991. A Transactional Model for Long-Running Activities. 17th VLDB'91. Barcelona, Spain.
8. Eder, J., and Liebhart, W., 1995. The Workflow Activity Model WAMO. Int. Conf. on Cooperative Information Systems. Vienna, Austria.
9. Eder, J., and Liebhart, W., 1996. Workflow Recovery. 1st CoopIS'96. IEEE International, Brussels, Belgium, pp. 124-134.
10. Ellis, C., and Keddara, K., 2000. A Workflow Change is a Workflow. In: W.D. van der Aalst, J. Oberweis (Editor), BPM: Models, Techniques, and Empirical Studies. Springer-Verlag, pp. 201-217.
11. Ellis, C., Keddara, K., and Rozenberg, G., 1995. Dynamic change within workflow systems. Proc. of Conf. on Organizational Computing Systems. ACM Press, Milpitas, CA, USA, pp. 10-21.
12. Ellis, C., and Nutt, G.J., 1993. Modeling and enactement of workflow systems. Application and Theory of Petri Nets. Springer-Verlag, USA, pp. 1-16.
13. Heinl, P., 1998. Exceptions During Workflow Execution. EDBT'98. Spain.
14. Jorgensen, H.D., 2001. Interaction as Framework for Flexible Workflow Modelling. Group '01. ACM Press, Boulder, Colorado, USA.
15. Kammer, P.J., Bolcer, G.A., Taylor, R.N., and Bergman, M., 2000. Techniques for Supporting Dynamic and Adaptive Workflow. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 9(3): 269-292.
16. Klein, M., and Dellarocas, C., 2000. A Knowledge-Based Approach to Handling Exceptions in Workflow Systems. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 9(3): 399-412. Kluwer Academic Publishers.
17. Leymann, F., 1997. Workflow-based applications. IBM Systems Journal, 36(1): 102-123.
18. Luo, Z., 2001. Knowledge sharing, Coordinated Exception Handling, and Intelligent Problem Solving for Cross-Organizational Business Processes. PhD Thesis, University of Georgia.
19. a CAPSI. Porto, Portugal, pp. 29-42.
20. th CRIWG 2003. Springer-Verlag, France, pp. 159-167.
21. The OpenSymphony project. Http://www.opensymphony.com2001, 20-04-2001.
22. Reichert, M., Dadam, P., and Bauer, T., 2003. Dealing with Forward and Backward Jumps in Workflow Management Systems. Software and Systems Modeling, 2(1): 37-58. Springer-Verlag.
23. Rinderle, S., Reichert, M., and Dadam, P., 2003. Evaluation of Correctness Criteria for Dynamic Workflow Changes. BPM '03. Springer-Verlag, Netherlands, pp. 41-57.
24. Saastamoinen, H., 1995. On the Handling of Exceptions in Information Systems. PhD Thesis, University of Jyväskylä.
25. Sadiq, S.W., 2000. Handling Dynamic Schema Change in Process Models. ADC 2000. 11th Australasian. IEEE International, pp. 120-126.
26. Sadiq, S.W., 2000. On Capturing Exceptions in Workflow Process Models. 4th International Conference on Business Information Systems. Poznan, Poland.
27. van der Aalst, W., 2000. Workflow Verification: Finding Control-Flow Errors using Petrinet-based Techniques. In: BPM: Models, Techniques, and Empirical Studies. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 161-183.
28. van der Aalst, W., 2002. Workflow Management. MIT Press, London, England.
29. van der Aalst, W., and Basten, T., 2002. Inheritance of workflows: an approach to tackling problems related to change. Theoretical Computer Science, 270(1): 125-203.
30. van der Aalst, W., Hofstede, A.H.T., Kiepuszewski, B., and Barros, A., 2002. Workflow Patterns, QUT Technical report, FIT-TR-2002-02.
31. Voorhoeve, M., and van der Aalst, W., 1997. Ad-hoc workflow: problems and solutions. Database and Expert Systems Applications, 1997, pp. 36-40.
32. Worah, D., and Sheth, A.P., 1997. Transactions in Transactional Workflows. In: S.K. Jajodia, Larry (Editor), Advanced Transaction Models and Architectures. Kluwer.
33. Workflow Management Coalition - Terminology & Glossary TC00-1011, 1999, Document Number WFMC-TC-1011, Issue 3.0. WFMC.