Clinical e-mail in an academic dermatology setting

Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology

Volumn 54, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 1019-1024

  Kia, Kevin F ^a   Tavakkoli, Anna ^a   Ellis, Charles N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONSULTATION; DERMATOLOGY; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; E-MAIL; PATIENT REFERRAL; PRESCRIPTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE;

DERMATOLOGY; ELECTRONIC MAIL; HUMANS; SKIN DISEASES;

EID: 33646501024     PISSN: 01909622     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jaad.2006.02.046     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Harris Interactive. Internet penetration at 66% of adults (137 million) nationwide. The Harris Poll 18 (2002) 1-4. Available at: http://www.harrisinteractive.com/harris_poll/index.asp?PID=295 Accessed September 9, 2005
2. Harris Interactive. Patient/physician online communication: Many patients want it, would pay for it, and it would influence their choice of doctors and health plans. Health Care News 2 (2002) 1-3. http://www.harrisinteractive.com/news/newsletters/healthnews/HI_HealthCareNews2002Vol2_Iss08.pdf Accessed September 9, 2005
3. Committee on Quality Health Care in America, Institute of Medicine. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century (2001), National Academy Press, Washington (DC)
4. Katz S.J., and Moyer C.A. The emerging role of online communication between patients and their providers. J Gen Intern Med 19 (2004) 978-983
5. White B.C., Moyer C.A., Stern D.T., and Katz S.J. A content analysis of e-mail communication between patients and their providers: patients get the message. J Am Med Inform Assoc 11 (2004) 260-267
6. Katz S.J., Moyer C.A., Cox D.T., and Stern D.T. Effect of a triage-based e-mail system on clinical resource use and patient and physician satisfaction in primary care. J Gen Intern Med 18 (2003) 736-744
7. Qureshi A.A., and Kvedar J.C. Patient knowledge and attitude toward information technology and teledermatology: some tentative findings. Telemed J E Health 9 (2003) 259-264
8. Mallett R.B. Teledermatology in practice. Clin Exp Dermatol 28 (2003) 356-359
9. Pak H.S. Implementing a teledermatology programme. J Telemed Telecare 11 (2005) 285-293
10. Whited J.D., Datta S., Hall R.P., Foy M.E., Marbrey L.E., Grambow S.C., et al. An economic analysis of a store and forward teledermatology consult system. Telemed J E Health 9 (2003) 351-360
11. Patt M.R., Houston T.K., Jenckes M.W., Sands D.Z., and Ford D.E. Doctors who are using e-mail with their patients: a qualitative exploration. J Med Intern Res 5 (2003) e9
12. Carol R. Barriers to physician-patient e-mailing decreasing. Dermatology World 15 (2005) 1ff
13. Recupero P.R. E-mail and the psychiatrist-patient relationship. J Am Acad Psychiatry Law 33 (2005) 465-475
14. Spielberg A.R. On call and online: sociohistorical, legal, and ethical implications of e-mail for the patient-physician relationship. JAMA 280 (1998) 1353-1359
15. Board of Trustees. Guidelines for physician-patient electronic communication. American Medical Association (2002). http://www.ama-assn.org/ama/pub/category/2386.html Accessed September 10, 2005
16. Eysenbach G., and Diepgen T.L. Responses to unsolicited patient e-mail requests for medical advice on the World Wide Web. JAMA 280 (1998) 1333-1335
17. Eysenbach G., and Diepgen T.L. Patients looking for information on the Internet and seeking teleadvice: motivation, expectations, and misconceptions as expressed in e-mails sent to physicians. Arch Dermatol 135 (1999) 151-156
18. Huntley A.C. The need to know: patients, e-mail, and the Internet. Arch Dermatol 135 (1999) 198-199
19. Lewis A.D. Patients, physicians, and e-mail. Arch Dermatol 136 (2000) 121-122