High-speed digital imaging and electroglottography of tracheoesophageal phonation by Amatsu's method

Acta Oto-Laryngologica

Volumn 126, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 521-525

  Saito, Miki ^a   Imagawa, Hiroshi ^b   Sakakibara, Ken Ichi ^c   Tayama, Niro ^d   Nibu, Ken Ichi ^a   Amatsu, Mutsuo ^e  

^a KOBE UNIVERSITY GRADUATE SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

^c Nippon Telegraph and Telephone Corporation   (Japan)

^d NATIONAL CENTER FOR GLOBAL HEALTH AND MEDICINE   (Japan)

^e KOBE UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Acoustic signals; Electroglottography; High speed digital imaging; Neoglottis; Tracheoesophageal phonation

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTICS; ADULT; AGED; AMATSU METHOD; ARTICLE; CASE REPORT; DIGITAL IMAGING; ESOPHAGUS SPEECH; HUMAN; LARYNGOGRAPHY; MALE; PHONATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SIGNAL PROCESSING; TRACHEOESOPHAGEAL FISTULA; TRACHEOESOPHAGEAL PHONATION; VIBRATION; WAVEFORM;

AGED; ELECTRODIAGNOSIS; ELECTROKYMOGRAPHY; GLOTTIS; HUMANS; LARYNGEAL MUSCLES; LARYNGEAL NEOPLASMS; LARYNGECTOMY; MALE; MICROCOMPUTERS; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM STAGING; PHARYNGEAL MUSCLES; PHONATION; SIGNAL PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; SOUND SPECTROGRAPHY; SPEECH PRODUCTION MEASUREMENT; SPEECH, ESOPHAGEAL; VOICE QUALITY;

EID: 33646497672     PISSN: 00016489     EISSN: 16512553     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00016480500415613     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Amatsu M. A new one-stage surgical technique for postlaryngectomy speech. Arch Otorhinolaryngol 1978;220:149-52.
2. Amatsu M, Makino K, Kinishi K, Tani M, Kokubu M. Primary tracheoesophageal shunt operation for postlaryngectomy speech with sphincter mechanism. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 1986;95:373-6.
3. Mohri M, Yoshifuji M, Kinishi M, Amatsu M. Neoglottic activity in tracheoesophageal phonation. Auris Naus Larynx 1994;21:53-8.
4. Teraoka M, Kinishi M, Mohri M, Amatsu M. Neoglottic articulatory adjustment in tracheoesophageal speech. Larynx Jpn 1995;7:35-42.
5. Saito M, Kinishi M, Amatsu M. Acoustic analyses clarify voiced-voiceless distinction in tracheoesophageal speech. Acta Otolarygol (Stockh) 2000;120:771-7.
6. Bear T, Lofqvist A, McGarr NS. Laryngeal vibrations: a comparison between high-speed filming and glottographic technique. J Acoust Soc Am 1983;73:1304-8.
7. Childers DG, Hicks DM, Moore GP, Eskenazi L, Lalwani AL. Electroglottography and vocal fold physiology. J Speech Hear Res 1990;33:245-54.
8. Lecluse FL, Tiwari RM, Snow GB. Electroglottographic studies of Staffieri neoglottis. Laryngoscope 1981;91:971-5.
9. Brasnu D, Strome M, Buchman LC, Pfauwadel MC, Menard M, Martinez P, et al. Voice evaluation of myomucosal shunt after total laryngectomy: comparison with esophageal speech. Am J Otolaryngol 1989;10:267-72.
10. Miyaji M, Iwamoto Y, Oda M, Niimi S. Relation between voice quality and pathological vibratory patterns using high-speed digital imaging. Nippon Jibiinnkoka Gakkai Kaiho 1999;102:354-67.
11. van As CJ, Op de Coul BMR, Eysholdt U, Hilgers FJM. of digital high-speed endoscopy in addition to videofluoroscopic imaging of the neoglottis in tracheoesophageal speech. Acta Otolaryngol (Stockh) 2004;124:82-9.