Coarse woody type: A new method for analyzing coarse woody debris and forest change

Forest Ecology and Management

Volumn 227, Issue 1-2, 2006, Pages 115-121

  Woodall, C W ^a   Nagel, L M ^b  

^a USDA FOREST SERVICE   (United States)

^b MICHIGAN TECHNOLOGICAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Coarse woody debris; Coarse woody type; Forest type; Inventory; Stand reconstruction

Indexed keywords

BIODIVERSITY; DEBRIS; FORESTRY;

COARSE WOODY DEBRIS; COARSE WOODY TYPE; FOREST TYPE; STAND RECONSTRUCTION;

WOOD;

FOREST ECOSYSTEM; HABITAT; SPECIES DIVERSITY; SUCCESSION;

BIODIVERSITY; FORESTS; WILD LIFE; WOOD;

EID: 33646495524     PISSN: 03781127     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2006.02.032     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Abrahamson W.G., and Gohn A.G. Classification and successional changes of mixed-oak forests at the Mohn Mill Area, Pennsylvania. Castanea 69 (2004) 194-206
2. Abrams M.D., Sprugel D.G., and Dickmann D.I. Multiple successional pathways on recently disturbed jack pine sites in Michigan. For. Ecol. Manage. 10 (1985) 31-48
3. Abrams M.D., and Scott M.L. Disturbance-mediated accelerated succession in two Michigan forest types. For. Sci. 35 (1989) 42-49
4. Abrams M.D., and Downs J.A. Successional replacement of old-growth white oak by mixed mesophytic hardwoods in southwestern Pennsylvania. Can. J. For. Res. 20 (1990) 1864-1870
5. Bechtold, W.A., Patterson, P.L. (Eds.), 2005. The enhanced Forest Inventory and Analysis program-national sampling design and estimation procedures. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report SRS-80. Asheville, NC.
6. Bull, E.L., Parks, C.G., Torgersen, T.R., 1997. Trees and logs important to wildlife in the Interior Columbia River Basin. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report PNW-391, Portland, OR.
7. Daniel T.W., Helms J.A., and Baker F.S. Principles of Silviculture. second ed. (1979), McGraw-Hill, New York
8. Daubenmire R.F. Plant Communities, a Textbook of Plant Synecology (1968), Harper and Row, New York
9. DeVries P.G. Sampling Theory for Forest Inventory: A Teach-Yourself Course. Line-Intersect Sampling (1986), Springer-Verlag, Berlin (Chapter 13)
10. In: Eyre F.H. (Ed). Forest Cover Types of the United States and Canada (1980), Society of American Foresters, Washington, DC
11. Frelich L.E. Forest Dynamics and Disturbance Regimes: Studies from Temperate Evergreen-deciduous Forests (2002), Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK
12. Frelich L.E., and Reich P.B. A spatial patterns and succession in a Minnesota southern-boreal forest. Ecol. Monogr. 65 (1995) 325-346
13. Frelich L.E., and Reich P.B. Neighborhood effects, disturbance, and succession in forests of the western Great Lakes Region. Ecoscience 2 (1995) 148-158
14. Fule P.Z., Covington W.W., and Moore M.M. Determining reference conditions for ecosystem management in southwestern ponderosa pine forests. Ecol. Appl. 7 (1997) 895-908
15. Goodburn J.M., and Lorimer C.G. Cavity trees and coarse woody debris in old growth and managed northern hardwood forests in Wisconsin and Michigan. Can. J. For. Res. 28 (1998) 427-438
16. Harmon M.E., Franklin J.F., Swanson F.J., et al. Ecology of coarse woody debris in temperate ecosystems. Adv. Ecol. Res. 15 (1986) 133-302
17. Heinz III H.J., and Center for Science. The State of the Nation's ecosystems: Measuring the Lands, Waters, and Living Resources of the United States (2002), New York, NY, Cambridge University Press
18. In: Helms J.A. (Ed). The Dictionary of Forestry (1998), Society of American Foresters, Bethesda, MD
19. Hibbs D.E. Gap dynamics in a hemlock-hardwood forest. Can. J. For. Res. 12 (1982) 522-527
20. Huffman, D.W., Moore, M.M., Covington, W.W., Crouse, J.E., Fule, P.Z., 2001. Ponderosa pine forest reconstruction: comparisons with historical data. In: USDA Forest Service Proceedings P-22, Fort Collins, CO, pp. 3-7.
21. Johnston K., Ver Hoef J.M., Krivoruchko K., and Lucas N. Using ArcGIS Geostatistical Analyst (2001), ESRI, Redlands, CA
22. Iverson L.R., and Prasad A.M. Predicting abundance of 80 tree species following climate change in the eastern United States. Ecol. Monogr. 68 (1998) 465-485
23. Lorimer C.G. Methodological considerations in the analysis of forest disturbance history. Can. J. For. Res. 15 (1985) 200-213
24. Maser, C., Anderson, R.G., Cromack, K., Jr., et al., 1979. Dead and down woody material. In: Thomas, J.W. (Tech. Ed.), Wildlife Habitats in Managed Forests: The Blue Mountains of Oregon and Washington. USDA Forest Service Agricultural Handbook 553, Washington, DC, pp. 78-95.
25. McCune B., and Cottam G. The successional status of a southern Wisconsin oak woods. Ecology 66 (1985) 1270-1278
26. Miles, P.D., Brand, G.J., Mielke, M.E., 2003. Minnesota's forest resources in 2002. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report NC-218, St. Paul, MN.
27. Miles, P.D., Brand, G. J., Alerich, C.L., Bednar, L.F.; Woudenberg, S.W., Glover, J.F., Ezell, E.N., 2001. The forest inventory and analysis database description and users manual version 1.0. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report NC-218, St. Paul, MN.
28. Oliver C.D., and Larson B.C. Forest Stand Dynamics (1996), John Wiley and Sons, New York
29. Pallardy S.G., Nigh T.A., and Garrett H.E. Changes in forest composition in central Missouri: 1968-1982. Am. Midl. Nat. 120 (1988) 380-390
30. Pedlar J.H., Pearce J.L., Venier L.A., and McKenney D.W. Coarse woody debris in relation to disturbance and forest type in boreal Canada. For. Ecol. Manage. 158 (2002) 189-194
31. Shotola S.J., Weaver G.T., Robertson P.A., and Ashby W.C. Sugar maple invasion of an old-growth oak-hickory forest in southwestern Illinois. Am. Midl. Nat. 127 (1992) 125-138
32. Smith, B.W., Vissage, J.S., Dar, D.R., Sheffield, R.M., 2001. Forest resources of the United States, 1997. USDA Forest Service General Technical Report NC-219, St. Paul, MN.
33. Taylor S.O., and Lorimer C.G. Loss of oak dominance in dry-mesic deciduous forests predicted by gap capture methods. Plant Ecol. 167 (2003) 71-88
34. USDA Forest Service, 1965. Timber trends in the United States. USDA Forest Service Research Report 17.
35. USDA Forest Service, 2001. Final environmental impact statement for the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness fuel treatments, vol. 1. USDA Forest Service, Superior National Forest Eastern Region. Milwaukee, WI.
36. USDA Forest Service North Central Research Station, 2002. Forest inventory and analysis national core field guide, vol. II: Field data collection procedures for phase 3 plots. Version 1.6. Section 14. St. Paul, MN, pp. 265-298.
37. Vogelmann J.E., Howard S.M., Yang L., Larson C.R., Wylie B.K., and van Driel N. Completion of the 1990s National land cover data set for the conterminous United States from Landsat Thematic Mapper data and ancillary data sources. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 67 (2001) 650-662
38. Waddell K.L. Sampling coarse woody debris for multiple attributes in extensive resource inventories. Ecol. Ind. 1 (2002) 139-153
39. Woodall, C.W., Williams, M.S., 2005. Sampling, estimation, and analysis procedures for the Down Woody Materials indicator. USDA Forest Service, General Technical Report NC-256, St. Paul, MN.
40. Zhang Q., Pregitzer K.S., and Reed D.D. Historical changes in the forests of the Luc District of the Upper Peninsula of Michigan. Am. Midl. Nat. 143 (2000) 94-110