Strength of British English accents in altered listening conditions

Perception and Psychophysics

Volumn 68, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 139-153

  Howell, Peter ^a   Barry, William ^b   Vinson, David ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b SAARLAND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHONETICS; SPEECH ANALYSIS; SPEECH PERCEPTION; UNITED KINGDOM; VERBAL BEHAVIOR;

ADULT; FEEDBACK; FEMALE; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PHONETICS; SPEECH PERCEPTION; SPEECH PRODUCTION MEASUREMENT; VERBAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 33646462919     PISSN: 00315117     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03193664     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. BEEBE, L. M., & GILES, H. (1984). Speech-accommodation theories: A discussion in terms of second-language acquisition. International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 46, 5-32.
2. BONGAERTS, T., MENNEN, S., & SLIK, F. V. D. (2000). Authenticity of pronunciation in naturalistic second language acquisition: The case of very advanced late learners of Dutch as a second language. Studia Linguistica, 54, 298-308.
3. BONGAERTS, T., PLANKEN, B., & SCHILS, E. (1997). Age and ultimate attainment in the pronunciation of a foreign language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 19, 447-465.
4. BORDEN, G. (1979). An interpretation of research on feedback interruption in speech. Brain & Language, 7, 307-319.
5. BORDEN, G. (1980). Use of feedback in establishing and developing speech. Speech & Language, 3, 223-242.
6. BRENNAN, E. M., & BRENNAN, J. S. (1981a). Accent scaling and language attitudes: Reactions to Mexican-American English speech. Language & Speech, 24, 207-221.
7. BRENNAN, E. M., & BRENNAN, J. S. (1981b). Measurements of accent and attitude toward Mexican-American speech. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 10, 487-501.
8. COWIE, R. L., & DOUGLAS-COWIE, E. (1992). Postlingually acquired deafness: Speech deterioration and the wider consequences. New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
9. FLEGE, J. E. (1999). Age of learning and second-language speech. In D. P. Birdsong (Ed.), Second language acquisition and the critical period hypothesis (pp. 101-132). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
10. FOULKES, P., & DOCHERTY, G. (1999). Urban voices: Accent studies in the British Isles. London: Arnold.
11. GILES, H., & SMITH, P. M. (1979). Accommodation theory: Optimal levels of convergence. In H. Giles & R. St. Clair (Eds.), Language and social psychology (pp. 45-65). Baltimore: University Park.
12. GRABE, E. (2002). Variation adds to prosodic typology. In B. Bel & I. Marlien (Eds.), Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Speech Prosody (pp. 127-132). Tokyo: Keikichi Hirose Laboratory.
13. GRABE, E., POST, B., NOLAN, F., & FARRAR, K. (2000). Pitch accent realisation in four varieties of British English. Journal of Phonetics, 28, 161-185.
14. GUENTHER, F. H. (1995). A modeling framework for speech motor development and kinematic articulator control. In Proceedings of the XIIIth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (Vol. 2, pp. 92-99). Stockholm: KTH and Stockholm University.
15. HAMLET, S. L., STONE, M. L., & MCCARTHY, T. (1976). Persistence of learned motor patterns in speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 60, S66.
16. HOWELL, P. (2002). The EXPLAN theory of fluency control applied to the treatment of stuttering by altered feedback and operant procedures. In E. Fava (Ed.), Pathology and therapy of speech disorders (Current Issues in Linguistic Theory series, pp. 95-118). Amsterdam: Benjamins.
17. HOWELL, P., & DWORZYNSKI, K. (2001). Strength of German accent under altered auditory feedback. Perception & Psychophysics, 63, 501-513.
18. HUGHES, A., & TRUDGILL, P. (1996). English accents and dialects: An introduction to social and regional varieties of English in the British Isles (3rd ed.). London: Arnold.
19. LABOV, W. (1986). Sources of inherent variation in the speech process. In J. S. Perkell & D. H. Klatt (Eds.), Invariance and variability in speech processes (pp. 402-423). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
20. LANE, H., & WEBSTER, J. (1991). Speech deterioration in postlingually deafened adults. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 89, 859-866.
21. LANE, H., WOZNIAK, J., MATTHIES, M. L., SVIRSKY, M. A., & PERKELL, J. (1995). Phonemic resetting versus postural adjustments in the speech of cochlear implant users: An exploration of voice-onset time. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 98, 3096-3106.
22. LING, L. E., GRABE, E., & NOLAN, F. (2000). Quantitative characterizations of speech rhythm: Syllable-timing in Singapore English. Language & Speech, 43, 377-401.
23. OLSON, L., & SAMUELS, S. J. (1973). The relationship between age and accuracy of foreign language pronunciation. Journal of Educational Research, 66, 263-267.
24. PERKELL, J., GUENTHER, F. H., LANE, H., MATTHIES, M. L., PERRIER, P., VICK, J., ET AL. (2000). A theory of speech motor control and supporting data from speakers with normal hearing and with profound hearing loss. Journal of Phonetics, 28, 233-272.
25. PERKELL, J., LANE, H., SVIRSKY, M. A., & WEBSTER, J. (1992). Speech of cochlear implant patients: A longitudinal study of vowel production. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 91, 2961-2979.
26. PERKELL, J., MATTHIES, M. L., LANE, H., GUENTHER, F. H., WILHELMS-TRICARICO, R., WOZNIAK, J., & GUIOD, P. (1997). Speech motor control: Acoustic goals, saturation effects, auditory feedback and internal models. Speech Communication, 22, 227-250.
27. PERKELL, J., MATTHIES, M. L., SVIRSKY, M. A., & JORDAN, M. I. (1995). Goal-based speech motor control: A theoretical framework and some preliminary data. Journal of Phonetics, 23, 23-35.
28. POSTMA, A. (2000). Detection of errors during speech production: A review of speech monitoring models. Cognition, 77, 97-131.
29. WELLS, J. C. (1982). Accents of English 2: The British Isles. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.