Stress changes along the Sunda trench following the 26 December 2004 Sumatra-Andaman and 28 March 2005 Nias earthquakes

Geophysical Research Letters

Volumn 33, Issue 6, 2006, Pages

  Pollitz, Fred F ^a   Banerjee, Paramesh ^b   Bürgmann, Roland ^c   Hashimoto, Manabu ^d   Choosakul, Nithiwatthn ^e  

^a U S GEOLOGICAL SURVEY   (United States)

^b WADIA INSTITUTE OF HIMALAYAN GEOLOGY   (India)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d KYOTO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^e CHULALONGKORN UNIVERSITY   (Thailand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANELASTIC RELAXATION; EARTHQUAKES; PERTURBATION TECHNIQUES; STRESS ANALYSIS; VISCOELASTICITY;

COSEISMIC DEFORMATION; COSEISMIC STRESS; COULOMB FAILURE STRESS THEORY; LOW-VISCOSITY ASTHENOSPHERE; POSTSEISMIC DEFORMATION; VISCOELASTIC RELAXATION;

SEISMOLOGY;

ASTHENOSPHERE; DEFORMATION MECHANISM; EARTHQUAKE EVENT; EARTHQUAKE RUPTURE; ENVIRONMENTAL EFFECT; SEISMICITY; STRESS CHANGE; SUMATRA EARTHQUAKE 2004; TRENCH;

ANDAMANS; ANDAMANS AND NICOBARS; ASIA; EURASIA; GREATER SUNDA ISLANDS; INDIA; INDIAN OCEAN; INDIAN OCEAN ISLANDS; MALAY ARCHIPELAGO; SOUTH ASIA; SOUTHEAST ASIA; SUMATRA; SUNDA ISLES;

EID: 33646462484     PISSN: 00948276     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1029/2005GL024558     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Ammon, C. J., et al. (2005), Rupture process of the 2004 Sumatra-Andaman earthquake, Science, 308, 1133-1139.
2. Banerjee, P., F. Pollitz, and R. Bürgmann (2005), Size and duration of the great 2004 Sumatra-Andaman earthquake from far-field static offsets, Science, 308, 1769-1772.
3. Bilham, R., E. R. Engdahl, N, Feldl, and S. P. Satyabala (2005), Partial and complete rupture of the Indo-Andaman plate boundary 1847-2004, Seismol. Res. Lett., 76, 299-311.
4. Cohen, S. C. (1996), Time-dependent uplift of the Kenai Peninsula and adjacent regions of south central Alaska since the 1964 Prince William Sound earthquake, J. Geophys. Res., 101, 8595-8604.
5. Dziewonski, A., and D. Anderson (1981), Preliminary reference Earth model, Phys. Earth Planet. Inter, 25, 297-356.
6. Freed, A. (2005), Earthquake triggering by static, dynamic, and postseismic stress transfer, Annu. Rev. Earth Planet. Sci., 33, 335-368.
7. Gudmundsson, O., and M. Sambridge (1998), A regionalized upper mantle (RUM) model, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 7121-7136.
8. Harris, R. (1998), Introduction to special section: Stress Triggers, Stress Shadows, and Implications for Seismic Hazard, J. Geophys. Res., 103, 24,347-24,358.
9. Hashimoto, M., N. Choosakul, M. Hashizume, S. Takemoto, H. Takiguchi, Y. Fukada, and K. Fujimori (2006), Crustal deformations associated with the great Sumatra-Andaman earthquake deduced from continuous GPS observation, Earth Planets Space, 58(2), 127-139.
10. Hu, Y., K. Wang, and J. He (2004), Three-dimensional viscoelastic finite element model for postseismic deformation of the great 1960 Chile earthquake, J. Geophys. Res., 109, B12403, doi:10.1029/2004JB003163.
11. Jade, S., M. B. Ananda, P. D. Kumar, and S. Banerjee (2005), Co-seismic and post-seismic displacements in Andaman and Nicobar Islands from GPS measurements, Curr. Sci., 88, 1980-1984.
12. Lay, T., et al. (2005), The great Sumatra-Andaman earthquake of 26 December 2004, Science, 308, 1127-1132.
13. McCloskey, J., S. S. Nalbant, and S. Steacy (2005), Indonesian earthquake: Earthquake risk from co-seismic stress, Nature, 434, 291.
14. Melbourne, T. I., F. H. Webb, J. M. Stock, and C. Reigber (2002), Rapid postseismic transients in subduction zones from continuous GPS, J. Geophys. Res., 107(B10), 2241, doi:10.1029/2001JB000555.
15. Miyazaki, S., P. Segall, J. Fukuda, and T. Kato (2004), Space time distribution of afterslip following the 2003 Tokachi-oki earthquake: Implications for variations in fault zone frictional properties, Geophys. Res. Lett., 31, L06623, doi:10.1029/2003GL019410.
16. Nalbant, S. S., S. Steacy, K. Sieh, D. Natawidjaja, and J. McCloskey (2005), Earthquake risk on the Sunda trench, Nature, 435, 756-757.
17. Parsons, T. (2005), A hypothesis for delayed dynamic earthquake triggering, Geophys. Res. Lett., 32, L04302, doi:10.1029/2004GL021811.
18. Pollitz, F. F. (1996), Coseismic deformation from earthquake faulting on a layered spherical Earth, Geophys. J. Int., 125, 1-14.
19. Pollitz, F. F., R. Bürgmann, and B. Romanowicz (1998), Viscosity of oceanic asthenosphere inferred from remote triggering of earthquakes, Science, 280, 26,975-26,992.
20. Sieh, K., D. H. Natawidjaja, M. Chlieh, G. Galetzka, J.-P. Avouac, B. Suwargadi, and R. L. Edwards (2004), The giant subduction earthquakes of 1797 and 1833, west Sumatra: Characteristic couplets, uncharacteristic slip, Eos Trans. AGU, 85(47), Fall Meet. Suppl., Abstract T12B-04.
21. Simoes, M., J.-P. Avouac, R. Cattin, and P. Henry (2004), The Sumatra subduction zone: A case for a locked fault zone extending into the mantle, J. Geophys. Res., 109, B10402, doi:10.1029/2003JB002958.
22. Stein, R. S. (1999). The role of stress transfer in earthquake occurrence, Nature, 402, 605-609.
23. Subarya, C., M. Chlieh, L. Prawirodirdjo, J.-P. Avouac, Y. Bock, K. Sieh, A. Meltzner, D. Natawidjaja, and R. McCaffrey (2006), Plate-boundary deformation of the great Aceh-Andaman earthquake, Nature, in press.
24. Yagi, Y., M. Kikuchi, and T. Nishimura (2003), Co-seismic slip, postseismic slip, and largest aftershock associated with the 1994 Sanrikuoki, Japan, earthquake, Geophys. Res. Lett., 30(22), 2177, doi:10.1029/2003GL018189.