A study of the suitability of videophones for psychometric assessment

Behaviour and Information Technology

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 233-237

  Demiris, George ^a   Oliver, Debra Parker ^a   Courtney, Karen ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MISSOURI   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

IMAGE QUALITY; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; INFORMATION MANAGEMENT; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; TELECOMMUNICATION EQUIPMENT; TELECOMMUNICATION SYSTEMS;

COMMUNICATION TOOLS; DISEASE MANAGEMENT; PSYCHOMETRIC ASSESSMENT; SUBJECTIVE QUALITY;

VIDEO TELEPHONE EQUIPMENT;

EID: 33646455181     PISSN: 0144929X     EISSN: 13623001     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01449290500195585     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. APTEKER, R.T., FISCHER, J.A., KISIMOV, V.S. and NEISHOLS, H., 1995, Video acceptability and frame rate. IEEE Multimedia, 2, pp. 32-40.
2. ARGYLE, M., LALLJEE, M. and COOK, M., 1968, The effects of visibility on interaction in the dyad. Human Relations, 28, pp. 289-304.
3. BRUCE, V., 1996, The role of the face in communication: implications for videophone design. Interacting with Computers, 8, pp. 166-176.
4. CLARK, H. and BRENNAN, S., 1991, Grounding in communication. In Perspectives on Socially Shared Cognition, L.B. Resnick, J. Levine and S. Teasley, (Eds), (Washington, DC: APA Press).
5. CLARK, H. and SCHAEFER, E., 1989, Contributing to discourse. Cognitive Science, 12, pp. 259-292.
6. COHEN, S. and WILLIAMSON, G., 1998, Perceived stress in a probability sample of the United States. In The Social Psychology of Health, S. Spacapan and S. Oskamp, S. (Eds) The Social Psychology of Health (Newbury Park, CA: Sage).
7. COHEN, S., KAMARCK, T. and MERMELSTEIN, R., 1983, A global measure of perceived stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 24, pp. 385-396.
8. DANSKY, K.H. and BOWLES, K.H., 2002, Lessons learned from a telehomecare project. Caring, 21, pp. 18-22.
9. DEMIRIS, G., OLIVER, D.R., POROCK, D. and COURTNEY, K., 2004, The Missouri Telehospice Project: Background and next steps. Home Health Care Technology Report, 1, pp. 49-55.
10. DEMIRIS, G. SPEEDIE, S., FINKELSTEIN, S. and HARRIS, I., 2003, Communication patterns and technical quality of virtual visits in home care. Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, 9, pp. 210-215.
11. DOHERTY-SNEDDON, G., ANDERSON, A., O'MALLEY, C., LANGTON, S., GARROD, S. and BRUCE, V., 1997, Face to face and video mediated conversation: a comparison of dialogue structure and task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 3, pp. 105-25.
12. DUNCAN, S., 1972, Some signals and rules for taking speaker turns in conversation. Journal of Personal and Social Psychology, 23, pp. 283-292.
13. EKMAN, P. and FRIESEN, W., 1975, Unmasking the Face (New Jersey: Prentice Hall).
14. ITU-T RECOMMENDATION P.920, Interactive test method for audiovisual communications. Available online at: http://www.itu.int/ (accessed 28 October 2004).
15. MEHRABIAN, A., 1971, Silent Messages (Belmont, NJ: Wadsworth Press).
16. MEHRABIAN, A., 1972, Nonverbal Communication, pp. 12-29 (Chicago: Aldine-Atherton).
17. NEGROPONTE, N., 1995, Being Digital (London: Hodder & Stoughton).
18. OSTBERG, O., LINDSTROM, B. and RENHALL, P.O., 1989, Contribution of display size to speech intelligibility in videophone systems. International Journal of Human Computer Interaction, 1, pp. 149-159.
19. REID, A., 1977, Comparing the telephone with face-to-face interaction. In The Social Impact of the Telephone Pool, I. Pool (Ed.) (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press).
20. RUDMAN, C., HERTZ, R., MARSCHALL, C. and DYKSTRA-ERICKSON, E., 1997, Channel overload as a driver for adoption of desktop video for distributed group work. In Video-Mediated Communication, K.E. Finn, A.J. Sellen and S.B. Wilbur (Eds), pp. 199-223 (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates).
21. TANG, J.C. and ISAACS, E.A., 1993, Why do users like video: study of multimedia supported collaboration. Computer Supported Cooperative Work, pp. 163-196.
22. WHITTAKER, S., 1995, Rethinking video as a technology for interpersonal communications: theory and design implications. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 42, pp. 501-529.
23. YOUNG, N.L., BARDEN, W., LEFORT, S., NIJSSEN-JORDAN, C., DANIELS, C., BOOTH, M. and DICK, P.T., 2004, Telehomecare: a comparison of three Canadian models. Telemedicine Journal and e-Heallh, 10, pp. 45-52.
24. ZUIDERENT, T., WINTHEREIK, B.R., and BERG, M., 2003, Talking about distributed communication and medicine: on bringing together remote and local actors. Human-Computer Interaction, 18, pp. 171-180.