Phenological responses to Leymus chinesis to climate factors

Chinese Journal of Ecology

Volumn 25, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 277-280

  Li, Rongping ^a,b   Zhou, Guangsheng ^a,b   Wang, Yuhui ^a,b   Han, Xi ^a,b  

^a NATIONAL CLIMATE CENTER   (China)

^b Institute of Pastoral Meteorological of Inner Mongolia   (China)

Author keywords

Average temperature; Climate factors; Global change; Phenology; Sunlight hours

Indexed keywords

CLIMATE EFFECT; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTOR; GLOBAL CHANGE; GROWTH RESPONSE; LEAF; PHENOLOGY; PLANT;

LEYMUS; LEYMUS CHINENSIS;

EID: 33646454128     PISSN: 10004890     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Chinese source. 1995. 37:66-73.
2. Chinese source. 2002. 17(5):714-719.
3. Chinese source. 2004. 15(9):1611-1615.
4. Chinese source. 2001. 12:75-79.
5. Chinese source. 2002. 47(20):1582-1587.
6. Ahas R. 1999. Long-term phyto-, omitho- and ichthyophenological time-series analyses in Estonia[J]. Int. J. Biometeorol., 42:119-123.
7. Beaubien EG, Freeland HJ. 2000. Spring phenology trends in Alberta, Canada: Links to ocean temperature[J]. Int. J. Biometeorol., 44:53-59.
8. Chmielewski FM, Rötzer T. 2001. Response of tree phenology to climate change across Europe[J]. Agric. Forest Meteorol., 108: 101-112.
9. Chuine I, Cour P, Rousseau DD. 1999. Selecting models to predict the timing of flowering of temperate trees: implication for tree phenology modeling[J]. Plant Cell Environ., 22:1-13.
10. Hänninen H. 1991. Does climatic warming increase the risk of frost damage in northern trees? [J]. Plant Cell Environ., 14: 449-454.
11. Huang JZ, Shresthaa A, Tollenaara M, et al. 2001. Effect of temperature and photoperiod on the phonological development of wild mustard (Sinapis arvensis L.) [J]. Field Crops Rese., 70: 75-86.
12. Kramer K, Leinonen I, Loustau D. 2000. The importance of phenology for the evaluation of impact of climate change on growth of boreal, temperature and Mediterranean forest ecosystems: An overview[J]. Int. J. Biometeorol., 44:76-81.
13. Menzel A. 2000. Trends in phonological phases in Europe between 1951 and 1996[J]. Int. J. Biometeorol., 44:67-75.
14. Myking T. 1997. Spring index models: Dormancy, budburst and impacts of climatic warming in coastal-inland and altitudinal Betula pendula and B. pubescens ecotypes [A]. In: Lieth H, Schwartz MD, eds. Phenology in Seasonal Climates I [C]. The Netherlands: Backhuys, 51-66.
15. Schwarz MD, Reiter BE. 2000. Changes in North American spring [J]. Int. J. Biometeorol., 20:929-932.
16. Spark TH, Jeffree EP. Jefree CE. 2000. An examination of relationships between flowering times and temperature at the national scale using long-term phonological record from the UK[J]. Int. J. Biometeorol., 44:82-87.
17. Spark TH, Carey PD, Combes J. 1997. First leafing dates of trees in Surrey between 1947 and 1996[J]. Lond. Nat., 76:15-20.
18. Stöckle CO, Nelson RL. 2000. Cropsyst User's manual (Version 3.0)[R]. Biological Systems Engineering Dept[C]. Washington: Washington State University, Pullman WA.
19. Vermaat JE, Verhagen FCA. 1996. Seasonal variation in the intertidal seagrass Zostera noltii Hornem: Coupling demographic and physiological patterns[J]. Aquat. Bot., 52:259-281.